I am not involved in this, nor am I a lawyer, so take this for what its worth.
But, for one, I don't get the whole good sumaritan idea. There is obviously a lot of risk taking orders for hundreds or thousands of dollars. Was the beneift simply to get personal access to cheap carbon fiber trim pieces? The risk/reward is heavily to the risk side and looks fishy. Wouldn't it just be easier to buy from a local vendor?
Secondly, by acting in this way, you become an agent for the seller. The US legal system will expect you to be able to acquire refunds or to provide products, since you took the money.
A relationship more like what you wanted would have looked more like you were a courier or provided some sort of currency conversion service. It would have come with terms and conditions, plus a lot of limits of liability.
But, simply offering to "give the money" to someone else is that of an agent and comes with reasonable expectations and, therefore, liability. Not only is there liability for the product not showing up but also for the millions of other things people get sued for all the time - like injuries. Say someone cuts their finger installing one of these pieces. Who do you think they will blame?
To play devils advocate, how would it look if the other guy never existed? Or, what if the other guy was never the manufacturer of any parts and scammed you? Or, what if you two were in on a scam? Can anything today be shown that proves this wasn't a two-party international scam?
I hope you don't take me to be accusing you or anyone of anything like this. I'm just trying to point out how the US legal system deals with situations where people take money on behalf of others.
Let me note two other things. One of John@Microsoft's posts had an image where the text read that 100% of long-time NSX owners have been scammed or lost money (or simliar) from someone in the community. As far as I can remember, I have not. I even deal with that evil company from San Diego area that some people claim scam people all the time. I don't have anything to be bitter about, I just took business law in college.
Also, I do think most people are good by nature and aren't out here to scam us. On the other hand, if you want to help people out by being the "go between", do it with some simple terms and conditions and, only after doing research on who you are representing. Perhaps someone could put together some basic "I'm only helping out" terms and conditions for those trying to help others in a group-buy situation.
I'm all for helping the free-market bring items to us. But, based on our imperfect legal system, you have to realize that "just helping out" is not good enough if people (or the legal system) starts poking around for missing money or products.
I hope Stuntman's opinion is correct and that this works out for you all.
But, for one, I don't get the whole good sumaritan idea. There is obviously a lot of risk taking orders for hundreds or thousands of dollars. Was the beneift simply to get personal access to cheap carbon fiber trim pieces? The risk/reward is heavily to the risk side and looks fishy. Wouldn't it just be easier to buy from a local vendor?
Secondly, by acting in this way, you become an agent for the seller. The US legal system will expect you to be able to acquire refunds or to provide products, since you took the money.
A relationship more like what you wanted would have looked more like you were a courier or provided some sort of currency conversion service. It would have come with terms and conditions, plus a lot of limits of liability.
But, simply offering to "give the money" to someone else is that of an agent and comes with reasonable expectations and, therefore, liability. Not only is there liability for the product not showing up but also for the millions of other things people get sued for all the time - like injuries. Say someone cuts their finger installing one of these pieces. Who do you think they will blame?
To play devils advocate, how would it look if the other guy never existed? Or, what if the other guy was never the manufacturer of any parts and scammed you? Or, what if you two were in on a scam? Can anything today be shown that proves this wasn't a two-party international scam?
I hope you don't take me to be accusing you or anyone of anything like this. I'm just trying to point out how the US legal system deals with situations where people take money on behalf of others.
Let me note two other things. One of John@Microsoft's posts had an image where the text read that 100% of long-time NSX owners have been scammed or lost money (or simliar) from someone in the community. As far as I can remember, I have not. I even deal with that evil company from San Diego area that some people claim scam people all the time. I don't have anything to be bitter about, I just took business law in college.
Also, I do think most people are good by nature and aren't out here to scam us. On the other hand, if you want to help people out by being the "go between", do it with some simple terms and conditions and, only after doing research on who you are representing. Perhaps someone could put together some basic "I'm only helping out" terms and conditions for those trying to help others in a group-buy situation.
I'm all for helping the free-market bring items to us. But, based on our imperfect legal system, you have to realize that "just helping out" is not good enough if people (or the legal system) starts poking around for missing money or products.
I hope Stuntman's opinion is correct and that this works out for you all.