Ski_Banker
Suspended

And keep in mind that the ladies won't be impressed if you pick them up in an NSX and then can only afford to take them to Wendys.
FF2Skip said:Hopefully the red '93 NSX I drove yesterday and wife-approved today will be in my garage next week.
You never return my calls. :redface:dave22 said:
Sorry. Mom just had surgery and I was on the road to GA. By the time I got your message I figured you were already past whatever you needed directions to.FF2Skip said:You never return my calls. :redface:
jeff_L said:Just to beat this into the groud a bit more... Have a little patience. 40k a year is NOTHING. NOTHING.
</geezer>
Jeff
P.S. I'm 27 =S
All In said:I'm trying to decide between the S2000/MZ4/NSX. I used to own a 2003 S2000, I'm a big fan of driving the car year round as low as 40 degrees outside with the heater on and top down. I was curious about the driving experience on the highway between the roadster and targa tops. The S2000 is pretty comfortable and allows you to see all around with the top down and windows down. You can even talk on the cell phone when putting your windows up, plus for the MZ4 and the S2000 you can get aftermarket windscreens.
Maybe those of you who have owned both can comment. How does the NSX do with the top off and windows down? Wouldn't there be more turbulance inside the cabin? I really enjoy being with the elements and don't want to have to put the windows up at 50-70mph.
Thank you.
So does that mean more turbulance or less?WingZ said:The roof out in the NSX is no comparison to dropping the top on an S2000.
latzke said:So does that mean more turbulance or less?
MJK said:There is an excellent comparison in the January 2001 Road & Track, I recall it being posted around here somewhere.
tondeuse2 said:i have been driving '93 nsx for 8+ years now and just picked up a 06 s2000.
s2000 stock
nsx - short gears, light flywheel, comptech clutch, rm swaybar, rm exhaust and comptech header
i consider short gear and sway bar a MUST for pre 97 nsx.
nsx - much roomier. more poised
s2000 - shorter shifter throw, open top, short turning circle
power steering is personal perference, but i'd much prefer without, steering feels loose in s2000 a bit when you make wide 70mph turns.
s2000 feels tight. nsx feels more balanced. nsx corners flatter
the biggest issue i have with s2000 is gearing and lack of torque. sweet spot for nsx is between 4500-8000 whereas for s2000 it does kick in until around 6500. If you have a nice nsx set up, you don't miss much of s2000 unless you feel like open top. turning fast in tight corner on second gear in s2000 is an issue. you feel no torque around 4-6k rpm and if you keep doing 6-8k rpm it gets tiring.
caution though nsx tire pressure, tire selection and alignment is crucial to running the car properly. i must have tried 10sets of tires. name them all. and I found the newest Dunlop Sports Maxx handily beats OEM yoko/bridgestone, as well as SO2 and SO3's in the water!
John
john@maucapital.com
tondeuse2 said:i have been driving '93 nsx for 8+ years now and just picked up a 06 s2000.
tondeuse2 said:i won't mod s2000 since it's a lease.
one thing on the turns, if you drove nsx for a few years you will definitely miss mid engine config. s2000 has sharp turn in but you feel you rear end is missing.
john
goldNSX said:Did you buy a 2.2 liter model?
otto_joe said:I believe the 2004+ US and Canada models came with the 2.2.
Otto
WingZ said:Actually I miss the lightness of the S2000 in the turns. The NSX is heavier and you feel it. Also the S2000 is a front mid engine so it's not that bad. It was so light and flickable. Plus you could alway's kick the back end out so easily. The new one has gained a couple of pounds ( like 20lb ) ,but still just a little over 2800lbs unlike the over 3100 of my NSX. Of course that's still b etter than the 3400lbs of my fatboy M3![]()
BioBanker said:If you change the spring rates in your NSX, you can fix this. I had the same complaint moving from my S2000 to the NSX. TODA coilovers ridded me of this 100%.
Look at the NSXR rates.