IMO, all original no mod low mileage with documented service records should command premium dollars.
How about an all original oem stock 96' Blk with 50k miles? :biggrin:
IMO, all original no mod low mileage with documented service records should command premium dollars.
I just sold 96 (41k miles) with every possible paper work from day one. Out of all the cars offer for sale only 3-5% have "timeline" service history and this include NSX's. Why don't we start a thread with cars that have full documented records recommended by Acura maintenance book- pretty sure not many have full service records. How many NSX's owners on this board actually replace their timing belt every 6/7 yrs or 60k/105k miles? Or flush brake fluid every 3 years? or change oil ever 3/5k Miles? or flush clutch fluid? or replace tires every 5 years regardless if driven 50 miles or 50k miles? how abt recommended preventive maintenance 7500,15000,22500,30,000, 45000,60000, 75000 and 90000 etc. How many of these example have OEM paint ? I see cars everyday seller swears up and down paint is original and it is not. Normal "joe" cannot detect body work/paint work. Very small percentage of cars reveal paint work during PPI. You just can't tell if done right (no tape line no dust spot no fish eyes no orange peal etc...) Only way to tell is to use a paint meter and very few shop use paint gauge to detect paint work.
I do believe my car falls into this category. 2 Owner, Doctor owned, entirely Acura serviced the entire time of ownership including Tires, Brakes, even the battery replaced by the dealership with ppw. I'm not interested to sell, but was very glad to find it when I did in the fact that it is very original and never messed with.
IMO, all original no mod low mileage with documented service records should command premium dollars.
In my opinion it all depends on the buyer. I do not see why an all original 1991 NSX should command a higher premium then a modded NSX of the same mileage. I would never drive any car stock, especially an NSX. If I were to pay a premium on an all stock car; I would then have to sink thousands into customizing it, suspension, wheels, stereo, aero kit, i/h/e etc etc etc.
For a buyer like me, I would actually pay a premium for a modded car over an all original stock one. I can't see why people would pay more for a stock geared NSX vs one with NSX-r short gears installed, just because its unmolested? I think we have to all agree the OEM 91-93 wheels are butt ugly, the oem Bose stereo system sucks and the list goes on of must things I would need to change...
I guess different strokes for different folks though
In my opinion it all depends on the buyer. I do not see why an all original 1991 NSX should command a higher premium then a modded NSX of the same mileage. I would never drive any car stock, especially an NSX. If I were to pay a premium on an all stock car; I would then have to sink thousands into customizing it, suspension, wheels, stereo, aero kit, i/h/e etc etc etc.
For a buyer like me, I would actually pay a premium for a modded car over an all original stock one. I can't see why people would pay more for a stock geared NSX vs one with NSX-r short gears installed, just because its unmolested? I think we have to all agree the OEM 91-93 wheels are butt ugly, the oem Bose stereo system sucks and the list goes on of must things I would need to change...
I guess different strokes for different folks though
In my opinion it all depends on the buyer. I do not see why an all original 1991 NSX should command a higher premium then a modded NSX of the same mileage. I would never drive any car stock, especially an NSX. If I were to pay a premium on an all stock car; I would then have to sink thousands into customizing it, suspension, wheels, stereo, aero kit, i/h/e etc etc etc.
For a buyer like me, I would actually pay a premium for a modded car over an all original stock one. I can't see why people would pay more for a stock geared NSX vs one with NSX-r short gears installed, just because its unmolested? I think we have to all agree the OEM 91-93 wheels are butt ugly, the oem Bose stereo system sucks and the list goes on of must things I would need to change...
I guess different strokes for different folks though
That is if you like the mods being put on the car by the previous owner. What if you don't like what's being put on the car? Would you still willing to pay more?
MYW... 05 black for $90k . Buy to keep or buy to resell?
NSX pool of buyers are already small couple w/mod, you have now eliminated a few more buyers. More mod less buyers (IMO) cuz you have to find a buyer who wants what is already on her. Hey I prefer B. Spears as a brunette but other may disagree....
In my opinion it all depends on the buyer. I do not see why an all original 1991 NSX should command a higher premium then a modded NSX of the same mileage. I would never drive any car stock, especially an NSX. If I were to pay a premium on an all stock car; I would then have to sink thousands into customizing it, suspension, wheels, stereo, aero kit, i/h/e etc etc etc.
For a buyer like me, I would actually pay a premium for a modded car over an all original stock one. I can't see why people would pay more for a stock geared NSX vs one with NSX-r short gears installed, just because its unmolested? I think we have to all agree the OEM 91-93 wheels are butt ugly, the oem Bose stereo system sucks and the list goes on of must things I would need to change...
I guess different strokes for different folks though
Have to agree, an original car will always bring more . my 97 was an original owner car with every piece of documentation since car was new (even have black velvet box that key fob, flashlight ,air gauge came in) .All services as per Acura ,this guy even had dealer change wiper blades . In my 40+ yrs of playing this game with cars ,boats and motorcycles once something is modified , its value goes down in comparison to cost of modification . I 've seen more money spent trying to get back to original and throwing out the aftermarket modifications .Yea the aftermarket guys will disagree but facts are facts
I think the NSX is a collector car.
There are lots of features and history that would support my thought process.
And AAA has been offering collector car insurance for the NSX since last year.
A little over a month ago, I was looking seriously at a few very nice 02 conversions that were tastfully modded and well built. But, when I saw an original 02 in a rare color, I was willing to pay a few extra K for the original as it will always hold it's value over the modded car if it is maintained properly. That said there is nothing wrong in owning a modded car as there are advantages to buying a quality build. For example, more HP, updated electonics, higher performance parts and what I call bling... wheels and body mods. And they are a blast to drive. But in the back of my mind is the question, was it modded to correct some issue in their history? It is rare that you will see the documentation that can prove that it hasn't. If you are into tracking the car or showing the car as a custom or just like the look they are awesome and an affordable way to get a car that looks like the NA2 or enjoy the track experience. Just don't count on it holding its value the same as a well maintained originally equipped car.
How many times do we see a custom car on Barrett Jackson with 75+K in mods sell for significatly less than the investment in paint and parts. If you are the builder and you're not in it for the love of the build you will be disappointed with the sale results everytime. Unless of course you are George Barris or Chip Foose. IMO the average buyer will pay more for an original than a highly modded car. Even if the modded car is the better performer and has a great look. That's just my observation. My flame suit is on.
IMO, all original no mod low mileage with documented service records should command premium dollars.
Exactly, those could be considered "custodian cars"; folks that own them as a custodian for the sake of preserving the vehicle with some enjoyable drives along the way
Well documented, well-kept, well-sorted, no bs, just preservation and appropriate maintenance... certainly not museum quality pieces which should command top dollar at the white glove level
I had the opportunity to own a museum quality 1991 and opted for a custodian 2000 with 16500 and I'm happy that I went that route... the value of my car has appreciated in the past two years
No complaints, being an NSX owner is great fun and I consider myself lucky regardless of the market value, every drive reminds me of it
let the games begin... let's see what people are willing to pay for this baddie
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Acur...4410985?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item5aef73f669