F1 2009 megathread

Congrats to Brawn GP on their success in their first race...hopefully their success continues.

On another note, I was disappointed with Vettel's wreck with Kubica at the end of the race. Last year Vettel impressed me and made me a fan, so I was rooting for a strong finish from him. I stayed up till 4am to watch him wreck.

After the wreck, the stewards have decided to dock him 10 positions at the next race. Though it was mostly his fault, I don't really agree that it was 100% his fault or should result in such a penalty. Kubica could have easily avoided the wreck by realizing that Vettel's tires were down on grip. He was clearly much faster because of this, but he still pushed maybe too aggressively for position. But that's racing and it was a split second decision for both drivers. It just sucks that it resulted in a negative outcome for both drivers.

http://www.formula1.com/news/headlines/2009/3/9098.html
 
Last edited:
Congrats to Brawn GP on their success in their first race...hopefully their success continues.

On another note, I was disappointed with Vettel's wreck with Kubica at the end of the race. Last year Vettel impressed me and made me a fan, so I was rooting for a strong finish from him. I stayed up till 4am to watch him wreck.

After the wreck, the stewards have decided to dock him 10 positions at the next race. Though it was mostly his fault, I don't really agree that it was 100% his fault or should result in such a penalty. Kubica could have easily avoided the wreck by realizing that Vettel's tires were down on grip. He was clearly much faster because of this, but he still pushed maybe too aggressively for position. But that's racing and it was a split second decision for both drivers. It just sucks that it resulted in a negative outcome for both drivers.

http://www.formula1.com/news/headlines/2009/3/9098.html


Vettel wasn't penalized 10 grid positions for the crash. He was penalized for driving a damaged/broken car after the crash. If he had only sustained some wing damage, or maybe a flat tire, he would have been ok, but a broken suspension like he had, it was bound to happen.
 
Vettel wasn't penalized 10 grid positions for the crash. He was penalized for driving a damaged/broken car after the crash. If he had only sustained some wing damage, or maybe a flat tire, he would have been ok, but a broken suspension like he had, it was bound to happen.

The link I posted says...

www.formula1.com said:
Red Bull’s Sebastian Vettel has been handed a 10-place grid penalty for next weekend’s Malaysian Grand Prix following an incident in Sunday’s Australian race. Vettel collided with BMW Sauber’s Robert Kubica during the latter stages in Melbourne as the Polish driver attempted to overtake him.

Following a post-race investigation, stewards decided to penalise the young German for 'causing a collision and forcing a driver off the track’.

and then a $50,000 fine for driving with the broken suspension

www.formula1.com said:
Both Vettel's and Kubica's cars sustained substantial front-end damage in the collision. But while the BMW Sauber driver spun off and hit a wall soon after, Vettel continued to drive his stricken RB5 with its left front wheel hanging off as the safety car emerged following the incident.

As a result the stewards have additionally fined him - and Red Bull Racing - US$50,000 for continuing to drive a damaged car.
 
Last edited:
That was an exciting race. Crazy ending, but fantastic results. I'd love to see what happens in Malaysia.

I hope Brawn gets better livery with the Virgin deal. Their cars, though simple, looked like test cars. Neat to see the drivers helmets painted to match the white and fluorescent yellow of the cars. :wink: The Red Bulls looked hot.

Did Ferrari even show up for the race? :rolleyes:
 
We don't know how much more effective those different diffusers actually are. Barichello's car had front wing AND rear diffuser damage, and he still performed awesome, even with a bad race start.

Now wouldn't it be something if they are deemed illegal and they are forced to change the design OR they are declared legal, all other teams copy and use similar diffusers, and they still get outperformed by Killer Bees and the two other "diffuser teams".

I agree. I think the Brawn car is the most developed on the field and the diffuser is just one more part of the developed package.

I loved how close the top 10 drivers were. The pack was fairly close together, and except for an incident with the #2 & #3 would have been a very tight points race with 4 teams in it. I hope the season continues that way. I know Ferrari & M.M. will improve but am very excited to see the other teams clearly in the mix for the championship.

The highlight for me was seeing Jenson & Ruebens celebrate. Those two had pure joy, Jenson - who's never had a legitimate shot and Ruebens who has, but had to play #2 to MS. Just great to see.:smile:
 
Re: Brawn; developed and stout

I agree. I think the Brawn car is the most developed on the field and the diffuser is just one more part of the developed package.
+1.

Was it just last year when Red Bulls were so fragile they couldn't bounce over the kerbs without breaking? Ruby's car took some licks and didn't seem to have any alignment issues. And the front wing survived in pretty good shape when it looked like it could've been crumpled up pretty good. Matchett commented on Ross putting a priority on reliability which includes a stout chassis.

Hey Swbatte, is that how you spell committee up north? :biggrin:
 
Re: Brawn; developed and stout

+1.

Hey Swbatte, is that how you spell committee up north? :biggrin:

Not anymore - we took a vote! :)
Love it when Americans give us lessons on spelling, after changing the spelling of 1/2 the words in the English language.

Thank god the French were allies of yours fighting the English at the same time as your war of Independence or you may have wound up speaking English like the rest of us! :)
 
How does the kers system actualy turn the stored electrical or kinetic energy into usable horsepower:confused:

Almost all of the KERS systems are "secret" systems and some of the teams haven't opened up publically on how their systems work outside of generalities. Here's some links on KERS:

http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/09/26/kers-technology-revealed/

http://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/f1/182014/f1-kers-flybrid.html

http://www.racecar-engineering.com/allarticles/274929/kers-in-f1-the-basics.html

http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/01/28/how-kers-works/

I thought this one was the best:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6bsxSw_kxW0&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6bsxSw_kxW0&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
 
Almost all of the KERS systems are "secret" systems and some of the teams haven't opened up publically on how their systems work outside of generalities. Here's some links on KERS:

http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/09/26/kers-technology-revealed/

http://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/f1/182014/f1-kers-flybrid.html

http://www.racecar-engineering.com/allarticles/274929/kers-in-f1-the-basics.html

http://www.bmwblog.com/2009/01/28/how-kers-works/

I thought this one was the best:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6bsxSw_kxW0&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6bsxSw_kxW0&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Thankyou for helping me!!!!
 
I don't see Vettel as the reason for the crash... in my view it was clearly Kubica's fault. Not to mention wholly unneccessary since Kubica was clearly faster.

Given the performance of Ruby's car after getting banged up and the fact that the Red Bull cars are very strong without the diffuser leads me to believe there is a lot more to the cars being quick or not than just the diffuser. Seems to me like that is an easy scapegoat and oversimplification of a very complex aerodynamic problem.

Also, I thought Hamilton did a hell of a job but I'm sure there will be plenty that can't or won't bring themselves to admit that. Either way, congrats to Brawn GP and hope they keep the momentum going.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for helping me!!!!

No problem at all - glad to help. ;)

Here's some good stuff from Autosport about the BGP win:

Dodgy Business: A fabulous story

As human stories go, it doesn't get much better the Brawn Grand Prix team's journey from near extinction to the top step of the Melbourne podium... By Tony Dodgins

What a fabulous story. Doom and gloom, people worrying about their mortgages, children and futures one minute, and finishing 1-2 in the Australian Grand Prix the next. As human stories go, it doesn't get much better than Brawn Grand Prix. Okay, it might have been accomplished over 15 months with a lot of Honda money but it was worth the air fare to Melbourne just to see John Button's face.

Throughout the weekend the excitement, enthusiasm and pure enjoyment writ large over the faces of Button and Barrichello, was infectious. And not once did they miss the opportunity to explain that it was not about them, but everyone in the team in such trying times. It was genuine and unprompted. For Jenson and Rubens, in varying measure, it was relief and gratitude speaking.

Even Ross Brawn himself looked shell-shocked. "You don't often find Ross lost for words but I think even the Big Bear was struggling a bit!" Jenson grinned post-race. "He didn't speak for 15 minutes."

Ross admitted it was so. "I've had some great experiences but that was quite moving, I must say. The emotions of the last three or four months… To be here was great, to be quick was great and to win the race was just sensational! I feel so pleased and proud for the team. I've had some of those experiences. They haven't. It's a great group of people. I've worked for some wonderful teams and this is as good as any. They've proved that with the car they've produced.

"I was quiet at the end. You just sit there and think - this can't be true, it can't be happening…"

But it was, and earlier in the weekend, after Massa and Alonso had both said that the Brawn car was a league apart and the title would be settled by mid-season, Ross likened it to Benetton in 1994.

"I'd like to think so," he smiled, "but you can never assume that. The rate of progress will be very rapid with the new regulations. Some people have forgotten what happens when new rules are introduced. At Benetton we sacrificed 1993 and in '94 we won the title. It was an anomaly in a way because we were a small T-shirt manufacturer that won the world championship. People didn't like it. They couldn't adjust to that concept. We've got a long way to go and people will progress very rapidly this year but, a bit like then, we started this car 15 months ago and we're the only team that did."

The team that Benetton unexpectedly beat in '94 was Williams, where Ross started his F1 employment in the mid seventies. Although he admitted it was never his ambition to have an F1 car with his name on – and it still isn't! – he looks to Williams as the model.

"I was lucky enough to start my career with Frank and Patrick, they are two very level-headed people and if there is any way we can emulate what they have achieved, it would be fantastic. I see them as our reference. They have had a couple of tough years but they seem to have a better car now and hopefully are going in an upward direction. The sort of team that Frank and Patrick have would be my ambition."

As things stand though, Brawn GP doesn't need to emulate anyone. They are the target and everyone else has to do the chasing. The pressing questions are: Why is the BGP001 so quick?; Is there more to it than the trick diffuser?; Will the rest catch up?; And if so, how long will it take?

As Martin Whitmarsh at McLaren says, there is no question that the type of diffuser used by Brawn, Toyota and Williams is an advantage and unless it is outlawed by the FIA Court of Appeal in Paris on April 14, everyone else is going to have to follow suit.

"Let's be clear," Whitmarsh says, "the concept circumvents the intentions of the OWG (Overtaking Working Group) regulations and generates more downforce. None of us doubts that. It's not one of these items that you put on and ask if it's going to be any good or not. It is undoubtedly a way of extending the diffuser and heightening it beyond the intention of the regulations.

"Everyone has to do it now. The problem is that because you have to introduce it quickly you will not redesign your gearbox or suspension before Spain and therefore we will be obliged to take the earliest iterations and implement them. And probably then have a second and third iteration, and by the time you get there fully you potentially have a new gearbox and suspension. Look at the cost of all that and you are into £5-£10 million of development."

What's a trick diffuser is worth?

"In first iterations people are seeing 10-15 points of downforce and you can probably think of 20 points being around one second," whitmarsh says. "But it's not just that. You create a virtuous circle. People struggled to switch the tyres on in Melbourne – Ferrari, ourselves, and others – and if the diffuser helps get the tyre in the right temperature zone, you've got performance beyond what would be mathematically available with the additional downforce."

Logically though, there's more to the Brawn pace than simply a trick diffuser. Toyota and Williams, the other members of The Diffuser Gang, were quick in Australia but they weren't Brawn quick. And Heikki Kovalainen savaged a goodly portion of Barichello's underbody on the first lap but Rubens still finished second.

"Err, yes," smiled Ross on Sunday night, "there wasn't too much of Rubens's diffuser remaining. We left most of it on the track. Hope nobody went and picked it up!"

So what else is it about the BGP001?

"Since we introduced the car," Ross says, "I don't think either Jenson or Rubens has had a spin or major excursion. That tells you the car is predictable and responds well.

"People talk about downforce and that's important but it's also important that you have a very stable aerodynamic platform. With these new regulations and a very low, wide front wing there are difficulties there because the wing can be pitch or ride height sensitive.

"On top of that, the vehicle dynamics group headed by Craig Wilson, who has been with the team a very long time, have done a superb job of analysing what should happen with the tyres, how they should work and what geometry changes we should make. If you actually look at where the car is very quick, it's in the slow and medium speed stuff. I went and watched on the circuit in Barcelona and there's some low and medium speed corners before the final turns and the car was exceptional through there. So it's a combination."

Brawn had a bit of a tight-rope to tread in Melbourne. He was blowing off The Establishment, having got to the grid courtesy of the goodwill of one of its major players, namely McLaren-Mercedes. And arguably he was taking the Mickey a little bit by being FOTA's technical representative at the same time as going very quickly with a floor that deliberately circumvented the intentions of the OWG's new rules, a point Flavio Briatore wasn't slow to make.

Ross was doubtless aware of the need to voice a few thank-yous…

"I must say that Mercedes has been fantastic," he said, "as indeed has McLaren. We are competitors, but Ron Dennis and Martin Whitmarsh have been fantastically supportive of our team staying alive and agreeing to allow Mercedes to supply us an engine. I have nothing but praise for Ron, who seems to be taking on a role as F1's elder statesman these days! There were times during the winter when we said we thought we had a future, although we weren't sure, but they never faltered in their support or in supplying us with information. They did everything to give us a chance of being here today - a fantastic job."

He meant it too. But the nature of F1 is that any bonhomie usually lasts as long as it takes for the Establishment to start being blown off. What chances of a Mercedes KERS system for Brawn if it all gets a bit tight up front, for example?

At the moment Ross isn't bothered. "It's not something we've looked at closely. We had to put the Mercedes engine in at the last minute and we've gained some weight in the car because of the modifications required, so we're not in such a strong position to accommodate KERS. We'll have to wait."

Has everyone taken that on board? Not only is it flying, but it's too heavy as well…

And, intriguingly, there's Sir Richard Branson. He arrived on Saturday for a hastily arranged press conference for a deal he'd inked four hours before getting on the plane to Oz. The fact that the cars weren't fully red and white before they ran round at the front before the world's TV cameras for two hours made me suspect that perhaps Sir Richard hadn't brought his cheque book with him, but that's probably just me being a cynic…

Whatever was agreed for Melbourne, Branson said on Sunday night: "I'm completely hooked after today so it's a good time for the team to sit down, twist my arm and ply me with champagne! We'll stay involved for a long time. The team needs funding and deserves funding. Hopefully there will be other announcements to be made soon. Many of my decisions are based on gut feelings. I knew about Ross Brawn and liked him. I knew he was capable of producing miracle cars and it seemed wrong that he was about to go out of business. Sometimes my intuition works, other times it falls flat on its face. Today though, it worked."

On Saturday Branson had made the point that it was fairly pointless having a car named after an engineer rather than something that needs promoting - such as Virgin or his environmentally friendly fuel, no doubt.

So, could we soon be looking at Virgin Racing instead of Brawn GP? In order to change the name again, the team would need unanimous agreement from the rest. That was forthcoming when it was Ross trying to safeguard 500 plus jobs, but my cynicism can't help wondering whether it would be forthcoming again after what the Brawns have just done in Melbourne!

Sort of, 'Okay chaps, listen. We are in danger of running out of money unless we can take some off the bearded fellow. But he'll only give us some if it's his show while we're in front. By next year you'll all have caught us up, so come on, let's have Virgin Racing so we can continue to rub your noses in it. Fair enough?'

I asked Martin Whitmarsh what he thought the chances of a second name change were, and the answer may surprise you.

"It's already had a name change and what you can say is that the teams were far more co-operative to that process than certain other bodies. There's always the temptation in these controversial times for people to leverage the situation and because of the name change they could potentially have lost their benefits. But the teams have co-operated once and there's no reason why they won't a second time - but other bodies also have to agree..."

Not quite sure what he means but presumably he's talking about Mr E. Kind of, 'Ere, beardie – sorry, Sir Beardie – you taking the Mickey, or what? Should have bought it when you 'ad the chance. No, I'm not paying your freight. You got your own planes, fly it yourself!'

You never know with Bernie but it's not every day that a man like Sir Richard Branson walks into the paddock in the middle of a downturn.

"Virgin or any sponsor new to F1 is positive," Whitmarsh said, "and let's be clear, the Brawn team wouldn't be here today if it wasn't for FOTA and its initiatives. That philosophy isn't going to change. We want to maintain the health of the sport and keep as many teams involved as we can."

Don't know if Flav is feeling as charitable though. Ross smiled a little and said, "I think his comments were a bit emotional. I think if he takes a step back and thinks about it they were not very logical. Clearly he's got a bit of a challenge with the team at the moment and he's firing out in every direction."

Briatore, for his part, thought it was logical to get upset when you've spent a winter chasing KERS performance in good faith because that's what the FIA wanted, while someone else has spent time getting an advantage through circumnavigating the intent of the aero rules. So welcome back, they're bickering again. But it's good healthy bickering this time. Bickering about ingenuity. Like it used to be. Remember ground effect, skirts and fan cars? That kind of bickering. All good stuff.

The big question: does Ross think Brawn GP can keep up with the pace of change?

"I think so. In restructuring the company we've been very mindful of performance. We have an upgrade planned for Barcelona, which looks quite good, and I think everybody will be incredibly motivated. It's not easy to find performance but it won't be for want of trying and we have a good resource. We haven't downsized the company to a level from which we can't operate, but perhaps we no longer have some of the niceties we had under Honda."

Ah yes, Honda. Any contact over the Melbourne weekend?

"Genuinely," said Ross, "the management at Honda have been pleased. Without them we wouldn't have got here. Nakamoto san rang me on Saturday to say how delighted he was for us." No doubt just before he jumped off the window sill…
 
Last edited:
You gents will like this:

Button keeps journos waiting for a good reason

Jenson Button is reported to have kept journalists waiting for ten minutes after his victory in Melbourne so that he could enjoy what a family website can only euphemistically describe as an apparently intimate reunion with his girlfriend Jessica Michibata.

In typically breathless terms, The Sun claims that Button, fresh from leading the season-opening race from start to finish, led Michibata away to a 'private room' for 'a special post-race debriefing'.

Button is described as emerging ten minutes later with a 'sly grin' to admit: "It got a bit steamy in there."


Considering all that the guy has been through, I'd probably be excited as well.
 
Do you guys think if this car still equipped with Honda motor, they would have won? Supposedly Honda motor is up to 40HP shy of others last season.
 
Do you guys think if this car still equipped with Honda motor, they would have won? Supposedly Honda motor is up to 40HP shy of others last season.

I think it's definately possible. Honda was already given the green light to modify their engine to increase the power of the unit, just like Renault. It's feasable that the car may have been even better with the Honda unit, seeing as Honda had KERS ready to go and, as Brawn said in the interview Ponyboy posted, the car is slightly heavier with the Mercedes equipment.

If Honda could've gotten the power to similar levels as other teams, I think the RA109 likely would've been even quicker than the BGP001.
 
I think it's definately possible. Honda was already given the green light to modify their engine to increase the power of the unit, just like Renault. It's feasable that the car may have been even better with the Honda unit, seeing as Honda had KERS ready to go and, as Brawn said in the interview Ponyboy posted, the car is slightly heavier with the Mercedes equipment.

If Honda could've gotten the power to similar levels as other teams, I think the RA109 likely would've been even quicker than the BGP001.

i totally agree with that. the chassis is the main thing in this era of F1, engines are so ristricted and there is no chance for innovation. in the 80's the engine was so much more important (in overall car performance wise) but right now the main differentiator between the engines is reliability and packaging. the Honda engine was reliable, and the package was to be better suited for Brawn's car than the merc engine.

again, its a big shame that honda lost faith on the team they built and left the sport
 
I don't see Vettel as the reason for the crash... in my view it was clearly Kubica's fault. Not to mention wholly unneccessary since Kubica was clearly faster.

Given the performance of Ruby's car after getting banged up and the fact that the Red Bull cars are very strong without the diffuser leads me to believe there is a lot more to the cars being quick or not than just the diffuser. Seems to me like that is an easy scapegoat and oversimplification of a very complex aerodynamic problem.

Also, I thought Hamilton did a hell of a job but I'm sure there will be plenty that can't or won't bring themselves to admit that. Either way, congrats to Brawn GP and hope they keep the momentum going.

I agree 100%
I looked at that replay a few times and it was clearly Kubica being over zealous that caused that accident. Thanks to his folly we had a Brawn 1,2!
BTW...brilliant drive by Hamilton. I still can't understand why people hate him so much, he is an amazing driver with personality....something most F1 drivers lack.
 
I agree 100%
I looked at that replay a few times and it was clearly Kubica being over zealous that caused that accident. Thanks to his folly we had a Brawn 1,2!
BTW...brilliant drive by Hamilton. I still can't understand why people hate him so much, he is an amazing driver with personality....something most F1 drivers lack.


People hate him because he's a douche who thinks he's the second coming of God, aka Senna ;) No doubt he's a good driver, he just happens to open his trap and say some of the stupidest comments.

There are so many other drivers with better personalities than him.
 
Last edited:
Had this been a Honda team I'd be psyched but I could really care less for them and their MB engines. It's like supporting McLaren! :tongue:
I'm happy that Rubens and Jenson are getting some love though. They are good drivers.
 
Think that soon will all teams had diffusers like Brown,its not important only diffuser.Aerodynamics and more important is balance,there is advantage of Browns cars.I'm so sorry that engine is not Honda.With Honda engine it would
be same positions 1.and2. JB and RB for sure.Shame for Honda that is out of game because I'm not so fan of Mercedes.
 
give it a rest, puhleazeee!

the Honda engine was reliable, and the package was to be better suited for Brawn's car than the merc engine...
Respectfully, I have to disagree w/ you AND just about everyone else who says the testing/qualifying/Aus'-F1_GP results would've been the same w/ a Honda powered car... :rolleyes:

As Brawn stated, keeping their own transmission facilitated the fitment/modality of the MB engine near-seamlessly.

Also, the #1 achilles of the past BAR/BAT & Honda teams was largely their reliability & overall mediocre pace (in most instances), in recent/later campaigns. Good lord almighty, have you seen the results of the past ~2 seasons?!? :eek:

Being an engine-supplier is one thing, being a turn-key constructor is another. . .

This is a great thread w/ awesome insights. Let's put unrealistic/illogical nostalgia to the side in terms of what could've/should've/would've happened if Honda had stayed. The team was a near cluster-fvck from the inside-out mired in bureaucracy & stubbornness as of late. A fresh, clean start was what was needed. Period. Full-stop. The end. . .

(only disappointment I have w/ Honda leaving was that they took ALL the K.E.R.S. R&D/tech' w/ them, which might prove to be fateful in certain situations/scenarios as the season progresses)
 
Re: give it a rest, puhleazeee!

As Brawn stated, keeping their own transmission facilitated the fitment/modality of the MB engine near-seamlessly.

I agree with most everything you've stated. However, the chassis required some modification to fit the Mercedes engine which resulted in extra weight that couldn't be used as ballast. Also the engine is 8mm higher than the Honda engine designed for the chassis. Both rather large disadvantages.

There really is no way to tell which engine would have made the car quicker. The Honda engine was to be used with their proprietary KERS system and had been in development for as long as the chassis was in development. Remember Honda F1 scrapped the entire 08 season to develop this engine and aero package so I'd lean to the entire package being pretty good.

But who knows really? It's all just assumptions and suppositions.
 
Back
Top