BaschBoost update, from MB

Originally posted by NSXTech:
I wish some of you nay-sayers would leave the safety of your keyboards and come into the trenches with me, and MJ, and Nick, and BZ, and Chris, and all the others who are out here in the real world using their pride and joy NSX's along side MY pride and joy VERYRED, finding out where fromula's end and the real world starts, and most important, where the fun is.

Right on! As I said in an earlier post
Theory gets validated through actual testing. ... If the findings through testing are different than the results obtained through formulas either the formulas and assumptions are wrong or the testing method is flawed. Given Mark is posting actual results from a respected dyno I'd have to say either the formulas are wrong or the assumptions being used in the formula are wrong.

Need I say more. I'll take real world results over postulated BS. BTW in case you haven't figured it out yet... it appears that the design is out of the lab now and into the production model stress testing phase looking for failures.

If we let Mark and the team run through this phase he'll have real world reliability data. The design will finalized along with product and installation warranty.

Mark - I wish I wasn't 1000 miles away as I'd love to get my hands dirty again. My plan is to be south in either So. Cal. or PHX where maybe you'll let me get in the way!
biggrin.gif
 
Originally posted by 4g62bt2c30a:

3.
Prove My Math Wrong. http://www.rceng.com/technical.htm

I have question for those who are knowledgeble with this equation. I thought HP was a product of torque and engine RPM. So how can you derive HP without knowing your RPM? Shouldn't the output of the equation be torque? There seems to be lots of variables that are just assumed and not presented in this equation as well to make it simple. Can someone explain?
 
Originally posted by nsxbadboy:

Im going to jump in the fray here.I dont have a degree in engineering or anything but that chart that you use on that site is wrong.I plugged the numbers of my Supra in and it said that at my HP levels Id have to run 655 cc injectors.Now,my injectors are stock and the car still runs rich.The car only comes with 550 cc injectors.I believe that if Mark B says it dynos 380hp then it does.I believe it so firmly that as soon as my numbers called Ill plunk down $5600.


I don't know how you do your math but mine says that your car at 100% duty will support 629 hp. And they do! Interesting point though.... The NSX has 6 240cc injectors. The Supra has 6 550cc's, The 3000GT has 6 450cc'S..... The Z has 6 310cc's..... Each car supports 270-320 Hp.... But three are turbo. All these other cars have the same displacement as our car. At what point do therse other cars run out of fuel? 400-425-450-500hp????? There is a reason every other manuf from japan uses a large injector on there turbo cars......Now.. If you asked me I think if you had the ability to tune the base program on the nsx (haltech,motec,dfi,Little black box) The best way would be to use a larger injector say 450 cc and tune it properly for the power curve....This would aliminate a lot of herky jerky hacker tweaker tricks to try to make something do what it is not made to do and still not have a saftey margin.... What about altitude changes of temp changes...These affect my car in na form.....Based of of the dyno charts the novi 1000 is pushing a lot of cfm at 5 psi , to me more than anything else available to us now..... That is the only way that it can produce that kind of power at only 5psi. All the other cars that I have seen producing anywhere neer that power has need lots more fuel than we see here.... For safety alone.... Ask Pulp what he uses on the race car to produce 390 rwhp with a less effiecent blower..... Big pump.... 390's and still not perfect..... and that is at much more psi....

More to Come...........
Corey
 
Originally posted by 4g62bt2c30a:
But three are turbo. All these other cars have the same displacement as our car. At what point do therse other cars run out of fuel? 400-425-450-500hp????? There is a reason every other manuf from japan uses a large injector on there turbo cars.....

And are these cars designed to run with a 5psi superchargers? Answer: NO

What would you use (according to your math) in these cars and the NSX to support a 5psi supercharger? Please show your work.

Another note: Using a larger injector and lowering the PSI is not a real good thing as the fuel is less dispersed in the combustion chamber.

DanO
 
Honda engines get anywhere from 15 to 40 per cent more power from a cubic liter than Ford or GM

According to my calculator, that's impossible.
biggrin.gif
 
Originally posted by DanO:
And are these cars designed to run with a 5psi superchargers? Answer: NO

What would you use (according to your math) in these cars and the NSX to support a 5psi supercharger? Please show your work.

Another note: Using a larger injector and lowering the PSI is not a real good thing as the fuel is less dispersed in the combustion chamber.

DanO


Huh? Where did you come up with that?
Boost is boost....
Horsepower is horsepower.

Are you telling me that a 300 hp motor requires less fuel if supercharged at 5psi that turbocharged ?

Its easy : 300 hp car :310 inj or 450cc or 550cc hmmm but we use 240cc?


Another note: Using a larger injector and lowering the PSI is not a real good thing as the fuel is less dispersed in the combustion chamber.

Where did you get this?




[This message has been edited by 4g62bt2c30a (edited 30 November 2001).]
 
Originally posted by NSXTech:
… And lastly, for now, to the common comment about paying a few dollars more for a better pump and injectors-it is not about money- it is about reliability and availability. There are no injectors available from Honda that meet the requirements we have, except possibly the JDM injectors that come with the Gruppe M kit, and since I turned them onto the p/n, with the CT hi-boost kit. These injectors are too big, and you must cut the fuel pressure way back to use them. If fuel pressure should increase from this number say because of an FMU failure, the engine would die a slow death from cylinder wash- I have witnessed this myself. I do not choose to use injectors from an aftermarket source because they fail too often compared to Honda injectors and I won't accept that. Cruise the Integra and Civic boards and read about the failurs of injectors from some of these companies you are so full of.

Well, I probably started the comments about the pump, but I hate to be lumped in with some of the others out here. My experience with the NSX is clearly very limited compared to yours, so now that I hear your explanation I would be less concerned if I were in the market for an SC. I also had never hear what someone else claimed above, that your system actually monitors the fuel pressure. I understand that voltage to the pump and the FPR adjust with boost, but does something else adjust according to the fuel pressure? How is that reading used? Anyway, the bottom line is, it would have been blind stupid faith on my part to assume that the original parts are up to the task and not bother to question it, particularly given my own experience with the stock pump. I’ve never been very good at blind stupid faith.

As for the follow-up question to the comments about diagnosing my own fuel pump problems, it’s quite simple. There was no need for a hi-tech means to chart fuel pressure vs flow in my case. With the fuel return line plugged I had < 90 psi at idle with the resistor removed (~14.5v), so that’s the pressure limit of the pump without an up-converter, period. With the return line still plugged I had a friend monitor a fuel pressure gauge as I ran full throttle and full boost. The pressure dropped precipitously to around 45 psi, which explained why increasing duty cycle of the auxiliary injectors didn’t help much, they simply sprayed longer at a lower pressure with little net gain in total flow. I replaced the fuel filter with no improvement. Replacing the pump completely solved the problem. So, why was my pump weaker than it apparently should be? I’m not sure, but why spend more for a voltage converter that forces an old and possibly suspect pump to work harder, and itself represents one more thing to install, one more adjustment, and one more potential point of failure, than it costs to buy a new pump with huge headroom? It wasn’t a tough decision.

So, I trust that any open minded person can see why I was concerned about using the stock pump in the Basch system, or any other trying to make that much HP. (True, the other SC kits manage, but by all appearances they make significantly less power.)

The pump I use is a Walbro 255. They just recently released an in-tank installation kit for the NSX. I don’t have the name of the vendor I used here with me but I’ll post it in a new thread this weekend. I should have done so sooner because he was SUPER helpful (I called and emailed lots of places) and I’d like to give him a plug.

Did I leave anything out?
 
Originally posted by nsxtasy:
Honda engines get anywhere from 15 to 40 per cent more power from a cubic liter than Ford or GM

According to my calculator, that's impossible.
biggrin.gif

Can any of my detractors explain in good soid engineering form, why Honda engines get anywhere from 15 to 40 per cent more power from a cubic liter than Ford or GM besides the obvious diffrence in redlines? I would love to hear it.

detractors : huh yea Ok....

Well Mark It's quite simple ... see to create BIG horsepower in a NA ca you need a Combustion..and well to have a cam porfile that will do this you sacrafice lo end torque and power this is where VTEC comes in you see the whole thing about having to cam profiles is what makes it all possible and well it has a patent. But there is good news, see in the US you can you similar technology you just have to call it something different, Like hmmmm VVTLI, see thats toyota they have a 1.8 ltr motor called the 1zzfe it produces 180 horsepower, And then there is the 3sge at 2 litre producing 200 hp.. and then you have the 4age20 1.6 lire at 160 hp. SO, I ges my answer to you question is "VARIABLE VALVE TRAIN TECHNOLOGY".......It seems pretty easy to pick on Ford and Chevy that use 50 year old technology. But Heh ..... Thats just the start...
More to Come,
Corey
 
Originally posted by ak:
I have question for those who are knowledgeble with this equation. I thought HP was a product of torque and engine RPM. So how can you derive HP without knowing your RPM? Shouldn't the output of the equation be torque? There seems to be lots of variables that are just assumed and not presented in this equation as well to make it simple. Can someone explain?

This is a question for hejo.. Can you explain in a technical sense how it is possible based off of you calculations... nobody likes mine?



[This message has been edited by 4g62bt2c30a (edited 30 November 2001).]
 
Just wondering.....did Comptech or Gruppe M receive this much grief when they unveiled their respective superchargers?
tongue.gif
 
Originally posted by sjs:
Well, I probably started the comments about the pump, but I hate to be lumped in with some of the others out here.

sjs- I'm not sure I understand the comment completely BUT I did want to say that I do not lump you into the same category as "some of the others out here" who clearly, IMO, have other agenda's. I consider your questions to be reasonable and fair and have NO problem with anything you ask. In fact, I have no problem with anything anyone asks except when they start trashing me because my product just might compete where they wished I would not.
Corey, If you ever get to the point where you want to discuss this stuff without the childish sarcastic and irrelevant comments, let me know.

Back to work. I have 11 NSX's in the shop today who all hope to be racing tomorrow and I will be here to at least midnight as it is.

Cheers,
Mark Basch
 
sjs has been here on the NSXprime forums for a while now. IMO he has proven to be intelligent, open-minded, and non-confrontational in his approach. I have come to respect his knowledge and experience; in fact, over the past year or so, I have probably learned more from him than anyone else here, with the possible exception of Mark Basch.

He also has a strong analytical bent like, uh... someone else here.
wink.gif
 
Originally posted by 4g62bt2c30a:
Huh? Where did you come up with that?
Boost is boost....
Horsepower is horsepower.

Are you telling me that a 300 hp motor requires less fuel if supercharged at 5psi that turbocharged ?

That’s kind of what I’m saying…there is a difference between a 300 hp motor running at 5psi and a 300 hp motor running at 30 psi. A 240cc injector (for example) at any given psi will flow more fuel into a plenum pressurized to 5psi then the same plenum pressurized to 30psi.

DanO
 
Originally posted by AndyVecsey:
Just wondering.....did Comptech or Gruppe M receive this much grief when they unveiled their respective superchargers?
tongue.gif

I don't think they did.... but they also did not use this forum to better there place in the market. There have been countless posts by chris,mark j and mark basch on the incredible peformance of this product being very clear on its proposed supriority. Unfortunatly,this group does not want to question the content at which it is been bombarded with. The reason there has not been any response from other manufacturs of this type of product is because they are dumpfouded by these claims? I do belive that Mark does have something here but it would be nice for him to stop posting how great the product is and imediatly take offence to the questioning of its possibility instead, we get a diluted response of how many cars alredy have the product or on order for one. I'm sure there are 11 nsx's that need to get out for this weekend but If you don't want open critisism don't post. If there is so many more changes to be done or finalized why post dyno results and then when questioned answer only to say that its still in beta testing? This makes no sense.... Furthermore, My comments are in direct response to your sarcasm and offensivenes. I feel sorry for SJS. He still has no response to his post. You choose to post about you not grouping him in with me than putting his mind at rest over the fuelpump issue. I may be flaming but it has been a couple of weeks now and the person who has made any sense is axlex V and he has only posted once ( If you even want to call it that?) .Whats wrong here? Ok so I propose this You have posted dyno runs, track tests etc....Oh and tacking orders and continuing to instll the BBSC. What was used to produce 379rwhp on chris's car (In detail) fuel pressures and all? Be technical.Maybe I can be proved WRONG.... There are enough people on this thread now that can make a determination.
Or ... Don't respond at all

Thats all I have .....
Corey


[This message has been edited by 4g62bt2c30a (edited 30 November 2001).]
 
Originally posted by DanO:
That’s kind of what I’m saying…there is a difference between a 300 hp motor running at 5psi and a 300 hp motor running at 30 psi. A 240cc injector (for example) at any given psi will flow more fuel into a plenum pressurized to 5psi then the same plenum pressurized to 30psi.

DanO


HUH? since when? Do you have an example?
 
Geez, seems everyone is going to Willow this weekend. Watch out for the rain on Sunday.

Anyway... it's nice that we are all so inquisitive about the setup. However, remember that Mark has proprietary information and is not at liberty to explain. I trust him and his claims. Under that assumption, he may have accomplished something that most other vendors have not. He is now supposed to go on a public forum AND GIVE THE SECRET AWAY to everyone, including the competition????
So everyone can see how he did it, then come out with the same thing 6 months later???
Why??? For the sake of our discussion?

Let's be reasonable. He has already posted all of the basic information on how the kit works. More than almost any other vendor would provide. His PROPRIETARY box is possibly a BIG part of producing this power safely.
There comes a point when some faith needs to be placed in the vendors. Yes, it would make a great discussion. That does not mean he should just divulge all this information, which probably took LOTS of research, for the sake of our discussion.

Doug's NSX has been putting out 396rwhp for some time now. Do you truly believe Larry is going to publicly post, step by step, how he produced this power w/ the Comptech SC so everyone can follow suit. He will explain to a point, and it is posted on NSXFILES. Don't expect him to explain in detail how his fuel management allows those HP numbers.

Both of these people have a company to run, bills to pay, and hopefully goals of continuing a successful business. There are some details we will never know and that is something that needs to be lived with.

In this case, Mark may have found a way to do what Comptech has not. True or False, only time will tell and everyone can believe wbat they choose. If in fact he did, he would have to be out of his mind to spill the beans on a public forum. This would be a major accomplishment and he needs (and has the RIGHT) to protect his proprietary information.


[This message has been edited by ilya (edited 30 November 2001).]

[This message has been edited by ilya (edited 30 November 2001).]
 
Originally posted by 4g62bt2c30a:

HUH? since when? Do you have an example?

I think he means that when the intake is pressurized, the pressure differential between in and the injector spray is reduced, which may effectively reduce the fuel delivered at a given psi of line pressure. You know, like pissing into the wind.
biggrin.gif


So, if it were a direct relationship, then you would need an extra 10 psi fuel pressure to achieve the same delivery at 15 psi boost that you get at 5 psi boost. I'm not sure it's that simple, but I see his point. Perhaps one of the engineers around here can show us the flaw in what seems a simple enough principal.
 
4g62bt2c30a replied - "Furthermore, My comments are in direct response to your sarcasm and offensivenes. I feel sorry for SJS. He still has no response to his post. You choose to post about you not grouping him in with me than putting his mind at rest over the fuel pump issue."

What the hell (sorry Lud) are you talking about, Corey? My post the one four posts before your 16:59 post, was my first entry into this thread. I never said anything about a fuel pump issue. Respectfully, you have me confused with someone else. But I gotta hand it to ya, you sure gave me a warm welcome.

Everyone, notice the the last four charaters of his username is "C30A"? This is Tochigi's designation of the 3.0L NSX engine. Maybe he knows something afterall.
wink.gif


[This message has been edited by AndyVecsey (edited 30 November 2001).]
 
Originally posted by sjs:
(snip)
I also had never hear what someone else claimed above, that your system actually monitors the fuel pressure. I understand that voltage to the pump and the FPR adjust with boost, but does something else adjust according to the fuel pressure?

(snip)

The pump I use is a Walbro 255. They just recently released an in-tank installation kit for the NSX.


Sjs, I think you might have misunderstood my post which stated that Mark B. has measured the fuel pressure on the dyno and on the road. This is during testing only, the actual kit does not perform any adjustment based on fuel pressure. However, I believe that installing a dash mounted fuel pressure gauge is common on the Comptech SC kit.

Thanks for posting the fuel pump info. Have you noticed any increased audible noise from the Walbro 255 pump installed in your NSX? I ask because of the "noise" comment at: http://www.vfaq.com/pump-Walbros.html

Regards,
Bryan Zublin

------------------
Zublin Engineering
http://www.zublin.com
 
4g62bt2c30a,

Jeeeez!!!! Your attitude is so combative,immature and irritating, your attempts at logic have failed, your poor writing is nearly inscutable, and your presence here is uniformly distained. Why don't you please just go away for a few weeks and give us all a well-deserved break from the insanity. (Lud is too tolerate to write such, so I did). Bye bye! Have a nice vacation on some other forum....maybe one for tuning Dodge Omnis...

------------------
NSXY
95 NSX-T, 5 sp, Red/Tan, Stock, except Dunlaptya SP9000s
 
Originally posted by sjs:
I think he means that when the intake is pressurized, the pressure differential between in and the injector spray is reduced, which may effectively reduce the fuel delivered at a given psi of line pressure. You know, like pissing into the wind.
biggrin.gif


So, if it were a direct relationship, then you would need an extra 10 psi fuel pressure to achieve the same delivery at 15 psi boost that you get at 5 psi boost. I'm not sure it's that simple, but I see his point. Perhaps one of the engineers around here can show us the flaw in what seems a simple enough principal.

That makes sense. Like if you took a system that was not made to be pressurzed and gave it 5 psi boost it would not be as effective?

Is that what you mean?
 
Originally posted by 4g62bt2c30a:
My comments are in direct response to your sarcasm and offensivenes.

We ALL know who began and continued the sarcasm and offensiveness shown repeatedly throughout this thread. Including Lud, who deleted the earlier posts in which they were contained.

Lud, will you let me post the troll photo again? Pleeeeeeeeease?
biggrin.gif
 
Doug's NSX has been putting out 396rwhp for some time now. Do you truly believe Larry is going to publicly post, step by step, how he produced this power w/ the Comptech SC so everyone can follow suit. He will explain to a point, and it is posted on NSXFILES. Don't expect him to explain in detail how his fuel management allows those HP numbers.

Ilya, Well There is one way to find out....ASK
biggrin.gif
 
No one has even commented about the fact that we long ago broke the record for highest number of posts in a single topic. This is post number 174, and the previous record was just over 100.

However, I don't think the counter goes down when posts are deleted, so what's left may be slightly less than what's indicated.
 
Back
Top