It will interesting to see what this example sells for. The pictures in the listing do not do it justice for a Rio Yellow Pearl, poor photography/lighting or both perhaps.https://www.mecum.com/lots/CH1016-272548/2004-acura-nsx-t/
Fantastic info, thanks! Great point on the Suzuka assembly, that's a cool fact."VIN is JH4NA21644S000030"A late production (Suzuka Ass'y) 2004 model year NSX.Been in CA only, as far as I know. Was for sale on FLEA-B*y 6-2012 with mileage 1,931 by Fine Line Autos of Fresno, CA. The buy it now (BIN) then was $83,750. It had OEM wheels, apparently chromed, then. It appeared very nice! F.S. on NSXPrime 8-2016 as a three-owner NSX for $119,750 at mileage 3,524. Looks beautiful! I'd be very proud to own this NSX.. . .
Sounds like you've got this all figured out, why not. In all seriousness, those seriously looking for a '02+ with ultra-low miles should contact me, this isn't the only one available...Sterling will you snap this NSX up on your dealer license and ship it Reliable Carriers enclosed for me directly over to west suburban Detroit - and then I would wire you $75 K large....... good?
whats wrong with black wheels? That's super easy to fix.....
I'm with you on the black wheels. Not my thing either. The tail lights don't appear to be painted though. I might be a total newbie here, but they look stock to me. The side markers don't look blacked out either. I think it's just poor lighting and a crappy camera, maybe both as previously stated above. The weather looks very overcast in the photos, so the reflectors appear kinda dark due to lack of light on them. Maybe I'm missing something though?Not my style, they always just look dirty all the time. Personally, on a higher mileage example, painted black wheels give me a feeling that a car hasn't been maintained with an "open" checkbook mentality that I look for when buying a car. I also hate the painted taillights and blacked out side markers. Just my opinion of course. Just doesn't inspire confidence to me.
I'm with you on the black wheels. Not my thing either. The tail lights don't appear to be painted though. I might be a total newbie here, but they look stock to me. The side markers don't look blacked out either. I think it's just poor lighting and a crappy camera, maybe both as previously stated above. The weather looks very overcast in the photos, so the reflectors appear kinda dark due to lack of light on them. Maybe I'm missing something though?
Not my style, they always just look dirty all the time. Personally, on a higher mileage example, painted black wheels give me a feeling that a car hasn't been maintained with an "open" checkbook mentality that I look for when buying a car. I also hate the painted taillights and blacked out side markers. Just my opinion of course. Just doesn't inspire confidence to me.
Rats.
NBCSN just cut over to NastyCar at 3:30 P.M. from the Mecum Chicago auction............they were at lot S101 (red 911) and the 2004 yellow NSX is lot S113.1 so it may go in about an hour. Supposedly, delayed auction coverage resumes tomorrow evening 9:30 P.M. on NBCSN so perhaps they will pick up where today's live coverage left off?
So again, yes, low-mileage '02+ NSX are $100k cars, but no, not close to $150k cars yet.
Its confusing. Watching a 1992 on BAT at $50,500.
http://bringatrailer.com/listing/1992-acura-nsx-3/
Then there was the 2003 that sold for $77,000. There is still a lot of flux out there. I think the valu of our cars is mostly to us who know them best!