Because Hewlett and Packard (Jobs and Woz uh...the list goes on), just happen to grow up in the immediate vacinity. Stanford was literally just down the street from their houses. As for the other guys...well...they didn't go to Stanford. And, I disagree with Stanford being so instumental in the transformation of those fruit orchards to wafer labs and such. They had nothing to do with it academically. the university simply had bare land around the campus. About 50 years ago or so, Stanford had some really bad financial problems...so they decided to lease this land out. They limited the leases to High-tech only. So, GE, Lockheed, HP followed after Varian corp jumped on the horse. Over the years Silicon Valley spread geographically to SJ and beyond. So you see, it was geography not academics that started Silicon Valley. Every university in the area now has top ranking CS and EE schools..unlike just 15 years ago when there was less to choose from. So, have I ever wondered why Silicon Valley got its start due largely to Stanford, and not any of the other local colleges in the bay area...have you? There's your history lesson for the day.Originally posted by 8000RPM:
Silicon Valley got its start due largely to Stanford, and not any of the other local colleges in the bay area.
Ever wonder why?
Ever wonder why Japan was so instrumental in the development of the Acura NSX..and not any other counrty on the globe
------------------
Todd E. Williams
'94 NSX Berlina Black/Onyx