True, he didn't rape the girl, BUT he did pursue her enough into being boyfriend/girlfriend. Thats way to slimy and being 24 is no excuse, sorry. Maybe if he was 17-18, but in his 20s, there is NO WAY he couldn't have known she was too young, I don't care how dressed up a girl gets to look older, anything after the first or second "look over" you'd know.
As the father of a 15 year old daughter, all I'd have to say is 'I own firearms, I own a shovel and I own property with a big field next to it.'
How do you know the circumstances of his conviction?
Regardless - As far as I'm concerned his conviction is between him and the state and if he's 'paid his debt' then fair enough. I think he's a dumbass based purely on his Bagdad-Bob mentality to denying stuff in the face of overwhelming evidence. That, and being an unmitigated spammer who spammed the wrong forum and found that the internet can be both his best friend and his worst enemy at the same time.