Ski_Banker
Suspended
CL65 Captain said:Putting in the speedbleeders in a total non-event. I am mechanically challenged and it took all of 10 minutes to swap them out. Piece of cake!
Thanks - anyone have thoughts on my other q's?
CL65 Captain said:Putting in the speedbleeders in a total non-event. I am mechanically challenged and it took all of 10 minutes to swap them out. Piece of cake!
Ski_Banker said:Thanks - anyone have thoughts on my other q's?
dquarasr2 said:You pretty much would want to change the fluid right before every event. The oldest fluid I use for a track event is about 3 months, especially here in So. Fla. But realistically, the extra insurance you gain for your $12 is worth it, say, if your fluid is two months old and there's a track event on the horizon; change it.
When I change the fluid, I empty the reservoir as much as I can (I use an ear irrigating syringe), then full it with fresh stuff. Bleeding the system starting from the wheel furthest from the reservoir, then moving toward the closest, or RR, LR, RF, LF. If the fluid is gross dirty like coffee, then it's easy to see how many pumps and drains are required to ensure the caliper has fresh stuff from the reservior. Otherwise, if you can't tell from the color just fill one of those brake bleeder cups (about four-five ounces) for the RR, a little less than that for the LR, less still for RF, and even less for LF. You should just about use up a bottle of Motul 600 (or around 16 ounces). You might as well use the whole bottle, as you can't store it on a shelf and use it later.
That would be your 90% flush, effectively giving you your max boiling point again, somewhere close to 600 degrees.
nsxtasy said:As long as you've changed your fluid within the previous 6 months of any track event, its boiling point will probably be within 30 degrees of the dry boiling point listed on the bottle. With one of the best fluids out there, that's plenty.
Changing your fluid before every track event is like changing your oil before every track event; it won't hurt anything (other than your wallet), but it's overkill.
dquarasr2 said:The problem is that I didn't know the absorption rate. I have seen graphs stating the boiling point degradation based on percentage of water absorbed, but I had never seen anything that told me how quickly fluid absorbs water. When I asked one of my very experienced friends whether I should change it, the answer I got was "you really need me to answer that?", meaning, don't bother thinking about it, just change it.
You're right, it's probably OK to go six months, but again, with humidity in this geographic area 80-90% all summer long, I didn't want to ever take a chance.
Skibanker, when are your next plans to do a track event? I'm going to Sebring on November 11. (Is that you I see on the Florida Turnpike between I-75 and Okeechobee Road, southbound in the mornings every so often?)
If you get totally stuck, I'd be happy to help you with your fluid change.
Hrant said:If concerned that much about the effects of humidity, do a simple test. Leave it for 9 mos and then send a sample to Blackstone labs specifying what you want to focus in the analysis. For $20 they might save you the hassle of changing the fluid every 6 months :wink:
Don, Don, Don, pay attention, will ya? I'm the last person to defend Hrant's nerdy proclivity, but he's simply saying that spending $20 once to decide whether to spend $15 and 30 minutes once an event or once a year is money well spent. Do the math.Yea but you are spending 20 bucks to test at best $15 of fluid.
92 white 0650 said:Don, Don, Don, pay attention, will ya? I'm the last person to defend Hrant's nerdy proclivity, but he's simply saying that spending $20 once to decide whether to spend $15 and 30 minutes once an event or once a year is money well spent. Do the math.
Better yet, if your dealer or independent mechanic has one of the gadgets to test the fluid's boiling point, they're usually happy to do it for free. John Vasos of Acura of Brookfield often brings his to the track with him...Hrant said:If concerned that much about the effects of humidity, do a simple test. Leave it for 9 mos and then send a sample to Blackstone labs specifying what you want to focus in the analysis.
nsxnut said:I think this depends on where you are at on the performance curve.
I have a friend that runs a very fast vintage race car. He bleads his breaks before every race. Yes every race. He is on the extreame high end of the curve. I am no where near this level.
If you are going to an hpde event onece or twice a year and are still learning
and not really pushing things than the above would surly be overkill.
You also have folks with significantly more horsepower than stock (supercharges, turbos, etc). More HP = more speed = more kinetic energy to be converted into thermal energy upon braking = hotter brakes = hotter fluid (unless you can increase cooling by a larger amount...which is rare).nsx2tall said:I have a different perspective on this. I find that as a novice I over use my brakes (too much braking into corners e.g. slower cornering speed). Don't be too quick to exclude yourself from the performance curve-- it just might be the wrong kind of performance.:biggrin:
I assume this means he tests yours.nsxtasy said:Better yet, if your dealer or independent mechanic has one of the gadgets to test the fluid's boiling point, they're usually happy to do it for free. John Vasos of Acura of Brookfield often brings his to the track with him...
You'll also carry more speed into the braking zone since you carried more speed out of (and maybe were able to get on the gas sooner when exiting) the last corner.Hrant said:Tires make a huge difference. With R compound, you will carry more speed and still brake less than street tires assuming no more HP.
Mine and lots of other folks. (People who track their cars frequently are a big part of his clientele.)latzke said:I assume this means he tests yours.
At the beginning, it's usually close to the figure shown on the label (i.e. 593 degrees F for Motul RBF 600). The boiling point declines by anywhere from 5 to 10 degrees F per month, so it's still more than adequate at the end of the season.latzke said:How does your boiling point at the beginning of the season (just changed) compare to the boiling point after one month/even, and how does that compare to boiling point at the end of the season (6 months of track events & living in average relitave humidity of 80% in the morning and 62% in the afternoon)?
latzke said:You also have folks with significantly more horsepower than stock (supercharges, turbos, etc). More HP = more speed = more kinetic energy to be converted into thermal energy upon braking = hotter brakes = hotter fluid (unless you can increase cooling by a larger amount...which is rare).
That leads to a general statement on this matter: Seems like Gerard van Santen would be toward high-end of the performance curve, and his NSX is supercharged, and he participates in races (no cool-down lap like can be had during an HPDE). I'm very tempted to think that changing fluid every event is overkill when he says, "I change my brake fluid once a year after each winter and that works fine for me."
nsxtasy said:Mine and lots of other folks. (People who track their cars frequently are a big part of his clientele.)
At the beginning, it's usually close to the figure shown on the label (i.e. 593 degrees F for Motul RBF 600). The boiling point declines by anywhere from 5 to 10 degrees F per month, so it's still more than adequate at the end of the season.
For the little bit of time it takes to bleed the brakes I can't understand why you wouldn't do it. You probably won't have a wreck today but I bet you still have insurance. Insurance is why I bleed every event. I've got a nice NSX in this hand and a $14 bottle of brake in the other hand ;-)BAM! That's what I was looking for! Now I know I'm probably safe changing it as little as every six months. Thanks for yet another informative post!