just wanted to add a post to the longest running thread i have ever seen!
Originally posted by MAKO:
I'm sorry boosted boy, but the NSX isn't in another league when it comes to the MR2. It's on a whole other planet.
That's the current pecking order, at least how SANE and UNBIASED people see it.
Originally posted by TheSwishh:
OK, I CANT TAKE THIS ANYMORE!!! I have been following this from day one and now I am getting pissed off!
MR2... I dont give a flying F*** about your car! Please stop posting pics and looking for some form of recognition. Save it for the MR2 forum. Sure you have a modifed car... BFD, I do too! Guess what??? It is still an NSX just when I first bought it. I dont go to the Ferrari/Lambo forums and whine to them that my NSX is comparable to their cars. Who F-ing cares???
Make NO mistake, you own an MR2. Nothing more, nothing less.
SHOO FLY!!!
What compels people to post here if they do not, or have never owned an NSX? I thought this was still NSX PRIME.
Originally posted by 8000RPM:
That's exactly the problem!
And that is why I feel that the value-proposition of a new sample is less than that of a used one.
By making the NSX highly reliable and top quality from the factory, Honda is indirectly hurting the sale of new samples. The NSX's strengths in terms of reliability and impeccable build-quality are its own worst enemies... when it comes to moving that brand-new '02 model out of the showroom!
Honda's ability to deliver a highly reliable and top build-quality product in the NSX is indirectly screaming the following advertising slogan at the marketplace: Why buy new when a relatively-new used one is just as good?
Oh the irony...
Originally posted by ALLAN:
well this thread has really branched out. we're now also critisizing watches!
Originally posted by MAKO:
I'm sorry boosted boy, but the NSX isn't in another league when it comes to the MR2. It's on a whole other planet. And the Ferrari 355/360 are the same magnitude better than the newest NSX in my mind. And the upcomming baby Lambo "Stella" or whatever they end up calling it will be the same step up over a 360.
That's the current pecking order, at least how SANE and UNBIASED people see it.
Originally posted by Enzo:
I prefer the Cartier Pasha 38mm chrono or the Cartier Roadster than those ugly Rolex !
Originally posted by ALLAN:
whats important are the sales figures...why do soo many more people choose the porsche over the nsx? lets see, your going to spend 75,000,85000, whatever, of your hard earned dollars, and one car is supposedly superior to the other. why do so many people choose the supposedly inferior automobile to the superior one? dont most logical people want the best for their money?
Originally posted by ALLAN:
ok z18 man. lets get into this one. lamborghini has not been competitive with ferrari in 30 years? wow, thats funny. being as im a fan of both marks, driven both and owned both. the only ferraris that could outperform the lambos are the mega dollar f40 and f50. both cars that are more race cars than street cars. pretty much every single magazine favored the countach to the testarossa, the diablo to the 512 and the 550, and now every single test favors the murcielago to the 575m.
heres the last paragraph from the autocar 2002."we want speed,style, and a bottomless pit of raw dynamic ability. we want the PINNACLE of exuberant bent-twelve mototring. we want a bona fide supercar. and theres only one car among this trio thats worthy of this title: the murcielago.
this was a test of the murcielago,575m, and the aston vanguish.
quick compro between an f50 and diablo 6.0
0-60 tied@ 3.6 sec
quarter mile 12.1 for f50 12.0 for diablo
braking from 80mph f50 213ft diablo 203ft
slalom speed f50-65.7 diablo 66.4
id list the 550 maranello, but its acceleration #'s were miles off, as was the slalom speed being over 4mph slower.
the new lamborghini L140, is going to be miles ahead of the 360. with 500hp,allwheel drive,abs,traction control, a target weight of 3100pds,6speed, aprice of 130-170,000, there will be no ferrari competition at all.
Originally posted by BoostedMR2:
it seems to me that the MKII MR2 has wrongly being left out of the analysis.