do we really need to go here again http://www.nsxprime.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132708&highlight=snakey+picture: :confused
do we really need to go here again http://www.nsxprime.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132708&highlight=snakey+picture: :confused
Wow, where can I go and spend $5,000. and get 500hp! If you can tell me where I can do that I might just buy another NSX and do it! LOL
I can put $1000 into a (fox body) Mustang and get it into low 12s (spend a little more on internals and heads and you're in the mid to high 10s)... Granted this car will only be good in a straight line but it can easily still be driven on the street and/or as a daily driver...
Lets just stick with the facts
I owned both at the same time for quite some time and Im not biased what so ever so here me out here..
Fact- stock 2003-2006 srt10 viper is faster than a stock 2002-2005 nsx
0-60 in 3.8 VS 4.5
Quarter mile in 11.7 at 123 mph VS 12.9 at 112 mph
This isnt a lil faster. This is a MASSIVE differance stock for stock
Honestly a supercharged 2005 nsx will still not run with a stock 2003 viper and only Twin Turbos will beat the stock viper. But what happens if you even bolt on minor mods to the Viper?
FACT-89K base price for a 2005 NSX VS 84K base prive for a convertable or 88K base price for a coupe. They are both in the same price range
FACT-both have less than 30K units made world wide and are bothe VERY rare vehicles
FACT-Both have bottom level exotic status
As FAR as HANDLING. Im in agreeance that my nsx was much easier to drive. But on actual road course the FACT is that a 2002 NSX couldnt even beat a 2002 Z06 in lap times. In comparison a 2003 Viper beats the z06..The porshe TT....lambos..ferraris..ect in all the lap timing test.
The current 2008 ACR Viper is the stock record Holder at numerous venues to include laguana secca as well as the Ring.
NSX while an amazeing car in my eyes. Isnt near the handling capability on a road course as a 2003 and up Viper. Now the 2002 and below GTS viper vs NSX is a much closer battle..
Again. It is a great feeling drivers car. I took great pleasure in driveing my nsx on spirited curvy roads with another friends nsx. but make no mistake stock for stock a srt10 viper is much faster on a road course. Though someone with great talent would be needed to exploit the Viper while a slightly above average driver could ring out a lot of potential from the NSX.
As to what gets more attention. Their were days people paid more attention to the nsx and days people paid more attention to the Viper. Also days it felt like I was driveing a regular car and no one noticed.
Simply put. If I ran into a bunch of sti and evo/supra guys then yea NSX over the Viper all the way. If I ran into a bunch of camaro/vette/mustang guys then Viper all the way. They both represent the near top of the food chain in their respective catergories.
Honestly these days you can get cars that have both of their strong points in one package. If my srt10 keeps raising in value like it has been then I may sell in a year or two and get a Gallardo or V10 audi R8. Both with the mid engine under glass the my nsx posessed, but also with the 500 plus HP V10 that my viper has, and both also great handling vehicles that will turn heads every bit as much as the nsx or viper.
Always will miss the nsx. But wont go back. Enjoy your cars gentlemen, They are VERY worth holding on too. probally shoot myself when a 1991 nsx is worth 70K in 10 years.
heres a vid of my baby's together. What a pair. Always fighting but they really cared for eachother and got along for the most part
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zryY1sB3K3U
.
.
.
Well I had..
nsx (fun)
viper (fun)
dodge ram (buisness)
van (family)
jeep (family)
My daughter turned 16 and was begging for a new car. Well Id been taken some heat from my wife over two nice sports cars just sitting their all the time that I hardly ever drive (Your not suppossed to drive these kind a cars every day!!!!!!) So I decided to trade one in to get my daughter a new ride.
After about 5 minutes of thought...... We could talk all day about handling and ride ect. Means little to me. However the mid engine desighn of the nsx was taken into great consideration. As well as rarity were they seemed to be a walsh. Looks wise they are both quite beautiful so again to me this was a walsh.
When the chips were down and it really came to it I looked at the one thing that makes my heart skip a beat about these types of cars. PERFORMANCE.
After haveing my nsx supercharged and the engine blowing and spending big money on a replacement engine (non supercharged at 240 rwhp VS the 330 rwhp when it was supercharged) well it was just slow. But supercharged or not it was honestly always slow next to my 480 rwhp Viper..
This is why I kept the viper. As my nsx would simply get laughed at when it came to this type of competition
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XPUFw0gpaw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebpJWRMUBYI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IY4xZqg7dqg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sM6Z5vWJZXY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPglwNGcPO0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fUSznhw4uw
Wow, where can I go and spend $5,000. and get 500hp! If you can tell me where I can do that I might just buy another NSX and do it! LOL
I love this post. I have a friend that has a 2010 zr1 that will not race against my nsx, why, because his 130,000 dollar car might lose. It is easy to own a fast car, it is not so easy to make it go fast. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vI8mknEWqO0
I think you are being optimistic - how would you go low 12's in a fox body for $1000? - a shirtload of NOS?
And it'll be "good in a straight line"??? I'm guessing you never had a fast fox body...
and mid to high 10's - you'll spend just about the same money as you would on just about any other car to go 10's...
It's always a sad day to loose an NSX brother....the prime family feels a warp in the "force". But life is too short to worry about someone elses choices and he had to make a choice - he made it and that's that.
I like both cars - I've never driven a Viper - would like to - never have driven a Vette either - but would like that too. I drove a Mustang GT yesterday just for grins cause my wife was thinking convertible.
One of the things hard to argue is overall massive speed and if that's what you like then the viper in Snakey's case was the right choice. But it's not the speed he'll miss - or maybe even the fact that the NSX isn't as fast on a road course - what I'm guessing he'll miss is the view out the front windshield - man that mustang was fine but you sit down in that car and you don't feel as intimately connected with your surroundings and the road - not even close. The view out of an NSX is one of the first things you notice behind the wheel as you drive. The other thing is that seat- it holds you in place like a race seat - not so in the mustang - it's no performer for a road course. The new Boss might be with the sport recarros but you would have to have em if you were going to track that car - not with the NSX - our NSXs are ready for whatever kind of driving you want to do. They are raw with out PS and I like that. I like a lot of things about my NSX and I love looking at it too.
Choices are always hard - we all have to make them from time to time and sometimes we just get bored with a particular car and want to try something else. In Snakey's case - heck doesn't sound like he's got enough time to do much driving anyway - so no big deal.
Another thing I will say and this would be how I felt - if I put an SC on my car and the engine blew and I had to replace it and go back to NA - it would leave a bad taste in my mouth. If I had to make a choice and I liked HP - Snakey's choice would be the same one I'd make in his shoes.
We don't have to extoll the virtues of either car - hell who are we Primers trying to convince - we all like our cars - and we don't have a choice to make. Many of us have only one toy car and we are enjoying our cars right now - Snakey is enjoying his Viper. Good for him - I have two words for Snakey - DRIVE IT! The fun of ownership to me is the driving experience - and I can't wait to get out there and look out that windshield of mine!
Adios
Well said. Good luck with whatever you decide to keep.sorry you feel that way brother. But at the end of the day its just cars. To degrade someone over cars is not very kind.
FWIW I did have an AEM on my nsx. Paid 1300 for it brand new. Also had one on my viper that was more than double that price. So I feel confidant that I made the right moves. But the engine was just never ment to be the 450 rwhp BBSC engine I envisioned. But please here me out. Even if I had hit 450 rwhp and everything ran great. My 2995 pound nsx was 3050 pounds with the supercharger ect.
My Viper is currently 3200 pounds and is haveing some more performance goodies installed for 500 plus rwhp in a few days.
Viper would still be faster. Supercharge the Viper and your talking 650-1000 rwhp depending on what you wanna do.
Just not a fair comparison. We are talking about a limited to 290 crank HP car VS a 8.3 liter 505 cubic inch MONSTER. People are doing heads and cams on vipers at 650 rwhp.
In retrospect. If I recall the built nsx engines were around 300 rwhp NA.
Its just not a fair comparison and was never ment to be.
I purchased them both because they were both special to me in their own ways. I paid 35K for my nsx back in 2008. Thats a high price for a 91 but it had what I was looking for. Trust me I really loved the car. Hopefully you will never have to let one of you babys go. But currently at 5 vehicles their was no way in hell I was gonna be paying regs for 6 every year. So my choice was made.
Good day Gentlemen and lets please not degrade ourselves to those of other forums. This is a classy place. Lets keep it that way and respect eachother
sorry you feel that way brother. But at the end of the day its just cars. To degrade someone over cars is not very kind.
FWIW I did have an AEM on my nsx. Paid 1300 for it brand new. Also had one on my viper that was more than double that price. So I feel confidant that I made the right moves. But the engine was just never ment to be the 450 rwhp BBSC engine I envisioned. But please here me out. Even if I had hit 450 rwhp and everything ran great. My 2995 pound nsx was 3050 pounds with the supercharger ect.
My Viper is currently 3200 pounds and is haveing some more performance goodies installed for 500 plus rwhp in a few days.
Viper would still be faster. Supercharge the Viper and your talking 650-1000 rwhp depending on what you wanna do.
Just not a fair comparison. We are talking about a limited to 290 crank HP car VS a 8.3 liter 505 cubic inch MONSTER. People are doing heads and cams on vipers at 650 rwhp.
In retrospect. If I recall the built nsx engines were around 300 rwhp NA.
Its just not a fair comparison and was never ment to be.
I purchased them both because they were both special to me in their own ways. I paid 35K for my nsx back in 2008. Thats a high price for a 91 but it had what I was looking for. Trust me I really loved the car. Hopefully you will never have to let one of you babys go. But currently at 5 vehicles their was no way in hell I was gonna be paying regs for 6 every year. So my choice was made.
Good day Gentlemen and lets please not degrade ourselves to those of other forums. This is a classy place. Lets keep it that way and respect eachother
well..I went out to do some 1/4 mile testing and then started hearing a rattling sound..
Took her to install my aem that came a few days later in the mail and they told me that one of the rods is broken and that the horrible sreeching sound is coming from my crank. She will still start and all but she's unsafe to drive since its all gonna come undone at any second..
This happenned to my 91 nsx with the version 2 ss box and the bbsc supercharger..
Happenned around a month ago. Ive just been to heart broken till post till now..
I bought that car for 37.5 K. My insurance said it was worth 42K. I bought it back from them for 32K and then sold it two days later for 18 k.
I MADE 13K OFF THAT DEAL
my second Viper wreck I made 3k off the deal..
My Viper is currently 3200 pounds and is haveing some more performance goodies installed for 500 plus rwhp in a few days.
In retrospect. If I recall the built nsx engines were around 300 rwhp NA.
Its just not a fair comparison and was never ment to be.