Ive owned a 370 rwhp 2004 na vette..
A 450 rwhp 1999 na viper
a 480 rwhp 2003 na viper
and currently have a 310 rwhp supercharged nsx
The nsx can do a lot with VERY little
at 2995 pounds for my nsx and 4.06 rear gears
vs.......
3310 pounds for my C5 and 2.73 rear gears ( auto )
3380 pounds for my 99 Viper and 3.07 rear gears
3390 pounds for my 2003 Viper and 3.07 rear gears
You'd be surprised how competitive a lil 5 psi of boost 1991 nsx can be
My nsx trapped 113 mph at only 310 rwhp
My 2004 vette trapped 112 mph at 378 rwhp
my 1999 Viper trapped 116 mph at 410 rwhp and 120 mph at 450 rwhp
my 2003 viper trapped 122 mph at 460 rwhp and 124 mph at 480 mph
Now my nsx is a lil faster than my head and cammed vette was and just a lil shy of what my stock 410 rwhp Viper did..With only 310 rwhp...
Im going to 8 psi and an aem next month...Im expecting 380 rwhp and for the car to trapp in the 117-120 mph range...
What your talking about doing is completely differant..A turbo will give you a minimum of 450 rwhp and trapp in the 125 plus mph range....That will be a seriously fast car...
But head this warning.....I could have kept my 2004 vette and dumped more money and ect. and had a 125 plus mph trapping car by now....
BUT A 50K VETTE WILL NEVER COMPARE TO MY 80-90K VIPERS AND NSX'S I HAVE OWNED NO MATTER HOW FAST THE VETTE IS...IT WILL ALWAYS JUST BE A VETTE..WHILE THE VIPERS AND NSX'S WILL ALWAYS BE VIPERS AND NSX'S...
WELL NO MATTER HOW MUCH MONEY YOU DUMP INTO A 90 K NSX IT WILL ALWAYS BE A 90 K NSX..I DONT CARE IF IT'S 1000 HP...IT WILL NEVER BE AT THE SAME LEVEL AS A 180 K F360...Your in your tt nsx and a f360 rolls up and you'll know what Im saying...
If you have the means then I say go for it....But if your only making like 10K a month or so take home and and think you can but it may be a financial burden then dont do it...Ive seen a lot of people trying to " fit in" to higher society and end up loosing it all....In that case I would keep the nsx
Just somthing to think about..By the way..When I say 90K or what ever Im talking about the origional price..Example is I only paid 35K for my 1991 nsx..but back in 1991 it was 60K..That sold for 100K....And to me it will always be a 60K car
A 450 rwhp 1999 na viper
a 480 rwhp 2003 na viper
and currently have a 310 rwhp supercharged nsx
The nsx can do a lot with VERY little
at 2995 pounds for my nsx and 4.06 rear gears
vs.......
3310 pounds for my C5 and 2.73 rear gears ( auto )
3380 pounds for my 99 Viper and 3.07 rear gears
3390 pounds for my 2003 Viper and 3.07 rear gears
You'd be surprised how competitive a lil 5 psi of boost 1991 nsx can be
My nsx trapped 113 mph at only 310 rwhp
My 2004 vette trapped 112 mph at 378 rwhp
my 1999 Viper trapped 116 mph at 410 rwhp and 120 mph at 450 rwhp
my 2003 viper trapped 122 mph at 460 rwhp and 124 mph at 480 mph
Now my nsx is a lil faster than my head and cammed vette was and just a lil shy of what my stock 410 rwhp Viper did..With only 310 rwhp...
Im going to 8 psi and an aem next month...Im expecting 380 rwhp and for the car to trapp in the 117-120 mph range...
What your talking about doing is completely differant..A turbo will give you a minimum of 450 rwhp and trapp in the 125 plus mph range....That will be a seriously fast car...
But head this warning.....I could have kept my 2004 vette and dumped more money and ect. and had a 125 plus mph trapping car by now....
BUT A 50K VETTE WILL NEVER COMPARE TO MY 80-90K VIPERS AND NSX'S I HAVE OWNED NO MATTER HOW FAST THE VETTE IS...IT WILL ALWAYS JUST BE A VETTE..WHILE THE VIPERS AND NSX'S WILL ALWAYS BE VIPERS AND NSX'S...
WELL NO MATTER HOW MUCH MONEY YOU DUMP INTO A 90 K NSX IT WILL ALWAYS BE A 90 K NSX..I DONT CARE IF IT'S 1000 HP...IT WILL NEVER BE AT THE SAME LEVEL AS A 180 K F360...Your in your tt nsx and a f360 rolls up and you'll know what Im saying...
If you have the means then I say go for it....But if your only making like 10K a month or so take home and and think you can but it may be a financial burden then dont do it...Ive seen a lot of people trying to " fit in" to higher society and end up loosing it all....In that case I would keep the nsx
Just somthing to think about..By the way..When I say 90K or what ever Im talking about the origional price..Example is I only paid 35K for my 1991 nsx..but back in 1991 it was 60K..That sold for 100K....And to me it will always be a 60K car