NSX/MR2 said:
On average, the time for the NSX is better than the time for the C5 Vette.
This simply isnt true. It's actually pretty ignorant for you to make the statement at all. How many NSXs do you see at drag strips? How many of the 8000 or so NSXs in existance actually live at the drag strip?
Now how many Vettes do you see? Throughout the history of the C5, do you think any of us can even guess how many Vettes have shown up at the strip?
On the Corvette Forum alone, there are hundreds of guys that can show you stacks of time slips in the twelves on bone stock C5s.
With the NSX, we don't have enough people who GO to the drag strip (the NSX is not a drag car), to make a fair comparison.
We can, however, go by the magazine times since those represent pro drivers testing the car for performance. How many of THOSE times are in the 12s? Not meny.
So combining what you and Brian2by2 said, we have the following scenario:
1-Vette-hard to launch, lots of torque, not easy to get the most out of it, tons and tons of sub 13 sec timeslips from stock cars with AMATEUR drivers.
2-NSX-easier to launch, much less torque, easier to get the most out of it, a near TOTAL ABSENCE of sub 13 sec timeslisp from PROFESSIONAL drivers.
What is it about this that you arent able to comprehend? When you state that "on average, the NSX is obviously a faster drag car than the Corvette C5" you sound pretty crazy, just to let you know...