Did anyone see John Travolta waving the checkered flag? He also presented Kubica with his trophy.
very entertaining...Hamo talking foolish drivel because Jenson sailed away to victory.......That is a tough circuit, fast turns and few pure straights.I'm rooting for JB simply because of his Honda roots.
OK, how about this, he fell into the Tiger trap. Besides his stupid complaints, he was showing off on the street like a punk. As his father is no longer his agent, he's probably not getting the daily guidance he's been used to and therefore he "forgot his roots and how he was raised" yadee, yadee, etc.
On another note, while I've been critical of Jenson WRT self confidence and determination, he looked every bit the champion today. :smile: Just hope this wasn't a "blind squirrel" victory.
Good stuff going on all over the track. :wink:
Some of us agree with Matchett that publicly flogging your team on the radio when you're supposed to be concentrating on the race is not the right time. And whatever he did on the street the night before that got his car impounded was also ill-timed. That's all we're saying. You think his timing was appropriate and mature?I didn't mean to single you out Jonn. I was only quoting you to highlight the negative comments, same reason I'm quoting White 0650. I really don't think that Hamilton was foolish for questioning his second stop. The argument could be made that he needs to mature but I believe what should really matter is what he does on the track. With that been said, we have all said or done things that we wish we hadn't, especially in the heat of the moment. True he needs to accept faith, but the team made a mistake. Don't mean to start an argument, just stating my observations of this thread.
Some of us agree with Matchett that publicly flogging your team on the radio when you're supposed to be concentrating on the race is not the right time. And whatever he did on the street the night before that got his car impounded was also ill-timed. That's all we're saying. You think his timing was appropriate and mature?
P.S. Maybe you'd like to get over to Will Buxton's blog and leave your comment there.
Yes, it will be interesting to see if he can capitalize on his talent for being easy on tires. After hearing the comments this morning, it appears tire wear will be a huge factor, particularly in the early races. I would not be surprised to see some drivers having to make 4 pit stops on Sunday. :redface:
Lots of variables. :wink:
Button doesn't have what it takes to go head to head with Hamilton and come out the winner. The 2007 season was a good e.g. of Hamilton's speed. This season belongs to Ferrari or Red Bull. Now, HRT please give Senna a good car. Sauber should do the same for Kobayashi. Ahh well, one can hope. Sorry Vettel, but that's racing.
I found another Torrent source that archived the full F1 weekend from BBC and ITV. I don't mind watching the race one week afterwards. The qualy and race took up 2.3GB. Quality is excellent. It's 50 fps, as one would expect, but plays back just fine via a 720/60p hdmi feed to my telly from my computer.
Looks like Jenson Button just did that.
He just showed that he can.
Maybe I was watching a different race, but if I'm not mistaken, Hamilton pitted twice and started eleventh. Button started fourth and was the first on slicks (not quite head to head). Also if you look at the times that each driver was recording on fresh tires, I believe my comment still holds water. I really like Jensons "smooth" style, but Hamilton is just faster.
Maybe I was watching a different race, but if I'm not mistaken, Hamilton pitted twice and started eleventh. Button started fourth and was the first on slicks (not quite head to head). Also if you look at the times that each driver was recording on fresh tires, I believe my comment still holds water. I really like Jensons "smooth" style, but Hamilton is just faster.
Faster does not always win races if you use up tires faster as well.I really like Jensons "smooth" style, but Hamilton is just faster.
So does my comment. Button made the call to come in early for slicks. He may not have gone head to head against Hamilton, but he still has what it takes to win, which a lot of people keep saying he doesn't. If Jenson hadn't gone off the track with the slicks, he would have come out ahead of Vettel and lead the race much earlier.
That second stop for Lewis is questionable, but if he hadn't come in for fresh tires, what makes you think he would have come in 2nd or even won the race?
He couldn't get past Alonso on a fresher set of tires. Do you think he would have done much better had he stayed on his older tires?
Faster does not always win races if you use up tires faster as well.
This may be disappointing to those who watch F1 for just lap times, but it's similar to 100 meters freestyle swim race: in order to win, you have to control your strokes to be at just the optimal speed.
Hence Jenson drove at the optimal speed for the race in order to win. That speed is not always the fastest lap time for 3 laps.
Many athletes in the world can produce faster strokes over the short time it takes to cover 100 meters in water, when they do it out of water in a gym on exercise equipment. But far fewer of them can restrain themselves to do those strokes at the optimal speed to win the swim race.
That must be something Jenson's dad has taught him.
Last year, after a race when Ron Dennis was still in charge at MacLaren and they had just won a race in the rain, he told the BBC interviewer:"oh, we could have gone faster, but the hardest part was to restrain our driver Lewis Hamilton to not go too fast."
Hence a F1 driver has to do both now: produce a fastest lap for qualifying, and drive at the optimal speed to win the race.
Originally Posted by NSXrebel
I really like Jensons "smooth" style, but Hamilton is just faster.
I never questioned Buttons ability to win, infact I hope he proves me wrong, but the times don't lie. Neither did I state that Hamilton would have finished first or second. As far as Hamilton not been able to pass Alonso, now that is questioable, but the answer we will never know, thanks to Weber. And yes, I believe Hamilton was more than capable of finishing at least third, if he stayed out on his older tires. I would even speculate that McLaren was afraid of having the beginnings of a Senna/prost battle, hence Hamiltons second stop. Did you see the pass he pulled on Button in the opening laps? I commend Buttons strategy, however in my opinion Hamilton is the faster driver, which is my original point.
Faster does not always win races if you use up tires faster as well.
This may be disappointing to those who watch F1 for just lap times, but it's similar to 100 meters freestyle swim race: in order to win, you have to control your strokes to be at just the optimal speed.
Hence Jenson drove at the optimal speed for the race in order to win. That speed is not always the fastest lap time for 3 laps.
Many athletes in the world can produce faster strokes over the short time it takes to cover 100 meters in water, when they do it out of water in a gym on exercise equipment. But far fewer of them can restrain themselves to do those strokes at the optimal speed to win the swim race.
That must be something Jenson's dad has taught him.
Last year, after a race when Ron Dennis was still in charge at MacLaren and they had just won a race in the rain, he told the BBC interviewer:"oh, we could have gone faster, but the hardest part was to restrain our driver Lewis Hamilton to not go too fast."
Hence a F1 driver has to do both now: produce a fastest lap for qualifying, and drive at the optimal speed to win the race.
You have made some very valid points. However, I don't watch F1 to see who's lapping at the optimal speed or has the best tire strategy, I watch to see a race. Infact on most Sundays, I could care less who wins. Jenson is good at preserving his tires, I applaud that, then again he has been in F1 for some time. At the end of the day F1 is about speed and the faster driver/car usually/should win/s. Again, you are correct but in my opinion Lewis is the better racer of the two, whether he wins or not.
well after last weekend, everyone wants to talk about sprinklers on every track and turned on at random. If that happened, I can imagine it would prolly be controlled by diabolical Bernie.Australia was a great race and look at all the discussion it has provided. I can only hope the same can be said for Malaysia.
spoiler: Ken, stop reading now if you haven't seen Q. :biggrin:
Well, I hope Bernie's happy with the Q outcome and the wild chaos/action/tears that will surely come tomorrow with the expected rain. With moderate wetness, it should be a real pass-fest and as crazy exciting as a "Minute to Win it" show.
But if it rains hard and sporadically like today and last year's race, especially on the start and early laps, the hydro-planing, backmarkers and zero viz may prove to be too much for any real racing? IOW, could it all go wrong; from "exciting" to a catastophe that takes out the racers and leaves Senna and Chandhok fighting for a podium? With pitstop roulette and a red flag like last year................hmmmmmm, could happen.