TurboLexus said:I still enjoy the comparisons...if only to prove that the NSX holds up well against the current crop, especially as a pure driver's car. What I don't understand is how every other thread I read (including this one) mentions how Honda abandoned development on the car and left it as is. The engine, transmission, brakes, suspension, wheels, tires, mgt, ABS, pwr steering, body, interior, structure, etc have all changed over the span of the NSX production run. Not by leaps and bounds, but sometimes when you make radical changes to a working formula you can end up altering the dynamics of the car in a way which was unintended (best defense I can come up with for Honda ). Having owned '91 and '97 models, IMO the difference is pretty significant...but yes you cannot compare the output of the car with a Viper, Z06, AMG, 997T. Anyone who questions the capabilities of these cars needs to watch the Best MOTORing with GanSan wheeling the NSX-R against the F-car, P-car, two lambos, and CSL. Kay...i'm done now :smile:
I enjoy the comparisons as well, as long as people are reasonable and try not be so biased towards their own car. I prefer Japanese cars generally over American cars, but I appreciate what Chevy has done with the new Z06. That car has rewritten the performance benchmarks for many years to come. I think a lot of guys here need to crawl out of their cave and realize the NSX is no longer King of Hill and has not been the King for a long long time.
All the changes that Honda made between 1991 and 2005 on the NSX are all very minor in my book. If Honda even cared about the NSX, they would have continued to develop it further, but instead they gave it no major changes in 14 years, whcih is weak. They totally redesign the Accord and Civics from the ground up every 4 years. They could have at least given their performance flagship a total redesign at least once.
In 1990, the original NSX was the leader; today it is seriously deficient and overpriced, which shows in it's almost nonexistent sales until it was finally cancelled.
I have seen the video and was told that Best Motoring is very biased towards Japanese cars and that the NSX-R driver was much more skilled than the others and drove more aggressively. The same can be said about Top Gear who favor British built vehicles.
I was also told that the surprisingly fast N-Ring times for the NSX-R were not official since there was some question about the car itself and the start.
I am curious if the guys at Best Motoring could find a way for the NSX-R to outrun a new C6 Z06 on their home track.