qirex said:well you are obviously a great driver!!
nsx is a good option if you have $30k to spend on a sports car (great option).
However, i was an owner of a 91 for 4 months. Im sorry, but i love horsepower. I go to the track. We do willow (big/streets), fontana, LS...I'm a pretty decent driver. A stock NSX is no match for a modern sportscar...its great for 30k...but I'll take the GT3 every time over an NSX.
Just my personal opinion.
I hope that acura offers prime members special pricing on the next nsx.
Oh, and for their sake, the nsx had better beat the pants off the new skyline (my neighbor is Nissan's Cal design leader) - which from what ive seen and heard will be HUGE challenger. The upcoming lexus sportscar will also do great (commercially). Its amazing how out of touch acura seems to be. Just give the people what they want already!! How many RLs will have to sit on the lots until they FINALLY build a V8?? Same with new NSX. It needs at least 400HP. The Z06 is the new king of the hill. You MUST come with at least 500HP to compete...and yes, i've run my 600HP TT against the Z06 at the track.
Kudos to GM.
I'de never buy one, but damn i respect the car and that engineering.
28mpg!!! with a 7L engine?
I never see higher than 15mpg hwy, 9.8city. Yes, i have a lead foot
Yes, I agree Honda has rested on it laurels with the NSX for quite sometime, a little too long perhaps, but maybe because they did it right the first time and didn't need to mess with perfection:biggrin: It is still a timeless design when my '92 makes people(general public) scratch their collective head and say NO "It's a 92!!!??? The NSX was built to prove a point, BEAT THE PISS OUT OF FERRARI for half the cost and to prove that Honda can achieve what ever they set out to do...Don't worry, the next NSX will do the same:smile: