gobble said:Why should a charger take 10 seconds off my lap times but only a few off PD's? I don't think it makes that big a difference.
I did 2:45's last year without the charger and have in-car tapes to prove it. 2:29's with an NA car is insane.
Yes, you read it wrong. I said I did not need to upshift to fifth, so I was not going over 144. I'm not claiming that I WAS going 144, either. (I did need to upshift in the ITR, but the shift point in that car is 117, not 144.)NSX 3.0 said:Above post Ken (144 mph) fourth gear did I read it wrong.
RP-Motorsports said:In your case, you actually bolted up close to another 100 bhp.
nsxtasy said:Yes, you read it wrong. I said I did not need to upshift to fifth, so I was not going over 144. I'm not claiming that I WAS going 144, either. (I did need to upshift in the ITR, but the shift point in that car is 117, not 144.)
brahtw8 said:Shameless plug . . .
Quit the bench racing. (obligatory thread content)
Come to the dyno event.
http://www.nsxprime.com/forums/showthread.php?t=51017
brahtw8 said:Some folks believe a one pound reduction in unsprung weight is worth 10 pounds of sprung weight reduction.
gobble said:I did 2:45's last year without the charger and have in-car tapes to prove it.
gobble said:Do you have this backwards? Isn't it worth more to lose weight in the wheels and tires?
gobble said:You're just saying that because you're slow on the track but fast at the dyno.
RP-Motorsports said:Hey Ryan great dyno #'s. Is that with the Anytime race exhaust?
nsxtasy said:Sure, go ahead and post them. Of course, you WILL post whether there was other traffic on each lap you timed, right? And you won't be posting lap times when someone was held up by traffic, or slowing to let traffic pass, right?