All I know is this I had no problems with the engine in my NSX. I did however have major problems with the C/C system and also had to replace the window regulators along with other minor problems. Had I not had the extended warranty I would have not had a fun ownership experience with my NSX. Don't get me wrong here I really love the NSX it's design is one of the best in history IMO....BUT
A Ferrari 360 stock, the way it comes from the factory, is the same as a CTSC NSX when it comes to problems. Ask Dave.... netviper, or look for one of his threads when he bought Andy's super fast NSX. Super fast equals problems plain and simple.......SO
I would much rather have a stock Ferrari 360 than a NSX with a CTSC. If I am going to have a problematic car I might as well have the one with the flashy nameplate on the hood. I also am unsure of my next comment, but if a CTSC voids the warranty on the NSX then I certainly would not want to have one for sure. I don't mean voids the warranty to the extent it covers none of the car or just portions of the car. What I do mean is if the car is being finicky because of the SC and Acura has installed the CTSC then Acura pays to make the car run properly over and over again. Much like Ferrari would pay to make their finicky car that is under warranty run right. Although I hardly ever add any content to Prime that has any value, that is unless you like humor, I do in fact read almost everything that is posted. I see time after time those threads of people who have made their cars faster and I also see those people posting about how this part and that part is now broken or how their car has been in the shop for months. I really prefer to drive my cars the way they come from the factory so that it is the factorys problems when the car breaks. At that point they can fix it and give me something else to drive while they are fixing it.......HENCE
My decision to buy the SL55 was easy. Super high horsepower, lots of torque. I can pound the crap out of the car and even break it and it is Mercedes problem to fix the car if I do break it, because THEY put the SC on it not me. It is the way it came from the factory and it is their problem not mine. BTW I have only had one problem with my SL so far, and it was torque related too, something that would not have been covered on a CTSCed NSX.
You guys really need to compare apples to apples if you are going to answer the question that started this thread. It seems this question comes up often on Prime and it is always answered with....I would buy the NSX but I would add....blah blah blah. SO the real question is stock to stock what do you want, oh and both cars are brand new with a warranty.
Dave did not have a CTSC, it was a BBSC :frown:
seriously which would you rather have? For me, its an easy choice. Not that I don't like the 360. But that car is mostly about posing...
That's what I thought about you guys owning a NSX...just posing...trying to compensate for something smaller.
Or maybe you just have low self esteem and you think a car will build you up. How about you guys hit the gym instead. Just because you have a loud aftermarket exhaust, it won't make you a man.
Guess what I did as soon as I could afford one...I went out and bought one (NSX). :biggrin:
So, I agree entirely with the statement...the 360 is mostly about posing.
....of course, that's until I could afford one and park it in my garage! :tongue:
Two F-s and a Pantera!!!Having owned 2 Ferrari's in the past, there's nothing I miss about the HIGH cost of maintenance, parts and insurance.
For reference: A 30k service is $2k at a private mechanic, $3k-$4k at a dealership (belts, tranny fluid, oil, etc.). As a weekend car, insurance is not that much more than an NSX (in my experience).
Two F-s and a Pantera!!!
I wanna party with you, Cowboy! (Bill Murray-Stripes)
I remember hearing or maybe thinking that the CTSC could be installed on a new NSX right at the dealer but I don't know for sure. I also remember thinking that if that were the case then the dealer would warranty the car fully? Is that the case?
I'm just curious with the news of the next nsx if anyone has considered stepping up to a 360 modena? I know they're expensive to buy, but it sounds like the maintenance doesn't seem to be too bad to keep up on other than the belt service is more frequent. Any thoughts? Has anyone done it? If so, have you regretted it? Did you keep the nsx?
I'm just curious with the news of the next nsx if anyone has considered stepping up to a 360 modena? I know they're expensive to buy, but it sounds like the maintenance doesn't seem to be too bad to keep up on other than the belt service is more frequent. Any thoughts? Has anyone done it? If so, have you regretted it? Did you keep the nsx?
As an 02+ owner I wouldn't consider an F360 stepping up. We've had this discussion before and it still hasn't changed the fact that for the money the performance difference is negligible. Most NSX owners have much older models so maybe it's upgrade to them. NA2 coupe pretty much matches the F360 move by move. I just wish they had offered an 02+ coupe to make it more of an even comparison.
Also considering to buy a used car because you don't like a concept is rather short sighted. Threads like this make me wonder do a lot of NSX owners buy the car just because they couldn't afford a Ferrari , which a lot of Ferrari owners contend. People here keep saying the NSX is/was their "dream car" ,but is it just their "affordable dream" and not their true dream car? I ask this because the NSX was never my dream car ( Neither were any Ferraris though:biggrin: ) ,but I feel like I stumbled on a pot of gold. I bought a Honda S2000 w/o test driving it and feel in love. I bought the NSX on the S2000 rep and have not been disappointed.
Those who really want a Ferrari should buy one maybe just get a ( ugh ) 348 and work their way up if a Ferrari is what they really want. This way we could get rid of the price posers as Honda made a great car and it deserves better than people who bought it because they couldn't afford a Ferrari:wink:
I went from a 1998 NSX to a 360 and they are worlds apart. 97 thru 05 NSX have the same 3.2 liter engine and 6 speed tranny putting out 290hp. I think the NSX is awesome if you are stepping up from a regular car, but the 360 along with other super cars over $150k new are in another ballpark. I also had a 05 Viper, not as refined as the Ferrari, jumped all over the place, highway strips pulled it all over the place, and the engine/exhaust really heated up the cabin. The v-10 sounded like a truck engine in which it was. I agree with others that the NSX is the inexpensive Ferrari alternative until you can afford the real deal.
Oh and as far as your "afford the the real deal" BS comment I paid cash for my brand new NSX and brand M3 in the same month so buying a new Ferrari isn't all that to me. My feeling if you can really afford a Ferrari you buy one new anything else is just a poser taking someones leftovers :wink:
Are you kidding me? Dude a years depreciation on one of my brake rotors is worth all your cars combined. Now that is real money. :biggrin:
It just gets on my nerves that people think people who buy NSX's can't afford a Ferrari or people who buy a used one and act like they've arrived. It's nuts to pay that much for a used car and a toy at that. If they make'em new buy'em new as you never know what happened before you bought it.
The NSX made the 360 what it is. So the F360 to me will always be an imitation.
What are you driving Big Steve? Oh and those aren't all my cars:biggrin: Oh hey don't think I'm trying to act like I'm some kinda of baller. It just gets on my nerves that people think people who buy NSX's can't afford a Ferrari or people who buy a used one and act like they've arrived. It's nuts to pay that much for a used car and a toy at that. If they make'em new buy'em new as you never know what happened before you bought it.