Red,
Before you use Canada as the superior, I think that your bigotry is just as rampant, maybe not as vocal. I wouldn't want to be a homosexual in the plains of Canada just like I wouldn't want to be th only black person at a KKK rally. I remember being in Montreal as well as in Mont Tremblant and not getting any service since I don't speak french. Funny, but my brother who was with me in Montreal didn't have any issues. Also in Vancouver at a restaurant, my brother and myself walked in first and we had no issues since we are of Asian background but as soon as my wife and a friend of our walked in, we no longer got any service and we got to listen to the waiters arguing with the manager that they weren't going to serve us since we had "whites" in our group. In regards to medicine, since I am just across the border, we get a fair number of patients who are willing to pay out of pocket because they are unwilling to wait for the Canadian health care system to take care of their medical issues, hip replacement last was a 2 year wait. They offer exellent primary care, as long as you live in a major metropolitan area but other areas suffer in contrast.
I do agree with you that we need to change our priorities, if we reduced our military and allowed the rest of the world to fend for themselves, well, we would really have no issues, I am not speaking of Iraq but all of Europe, Asia, the Middle East, Africa and South America. This would essentially put the US in a military position similar to pre WW1.
No place is perfect in regards to tolerance and bigotry so I think that to make broad generalities for diverse regions reflects our ignorance, mine included.
Since this is an election year, the good news is that we have some voice in change in the US and with the internet, there can now be more discussion of concens. Before you make blanket judgements, I would suggest that we all should look at the presidential candidates and look at their positions on what many have identified as problems like health care. I think that it is also equally important that you actually do the research into where they get their opinion. An example is that supporters of universal health care site an article published by the School of Pubic Health at Harvard University that states that heart attack rates would decline if we had universal health care. The basis of the decline is a public pole with a question "If we had universal health care, would heart attack rates decline, yes or no" There was no clinical data to support their conclusion in the paper and they point it out but this information is never mentioned. This paper is then used as a reference to point out the flaws in lack of insurance coverage. I think that we will have Universal health insurance but it will be paid for by most of you who don't already have insurance between the ages of 18-45. This is the age group who will pay but not use any of the resources.
Before you use Canada as the superior, I think that your bigotry is just as rampant, maybe not as vocal. I wouldn't want to be a homosexual in the plains of Canada just like I wouldn't want to be th only black person at a KKK rally. I remember being in Montreal as well as in Mont Tremblant and not getting any service since I don't speak french. Funny, but my brother who was with me in Montreal didn't have any issues. Also in Vancouver at a restaurant, my brother and myself walked in first and we had no issues since we are of Asian background but as soon as my wife and a friend of our walked in, we no longer got any service and we got to listen to the waiters arguing with the manager that they weren't going to serve us since we had "whites" in our group. In regards to medicine, since I am just across the border, we get a fair number of patients who are willing to pay out of pocket because they are unwilling to wait for the Canadian health care system to take care of their medical issues, hip replacement last was a 2 year wait. They offer exellent primary care, as long as you live in a major metropolitan area but other areas suffer in contrast.
I do agree with you that we need to change our priorities, if we reduced our military and allowed the rest of the world to fend for themselves, well, we would really have no issues, I am not speaking of Iraq but all of Europe, Asia, the Middle East, Africa and South America. This would essentially put the US in a military position similar to pre WW1.
No place is perfect in regards to tolerance and bigotry so I think that to make broad generalities for diverse regions reflects our ignorance, mine included.
Since this is an election year, the good news is that we have some voice in change in the US and with the internet, there can now be more discussion of concens. Before you make blanket judgements, I would suggest that we all should look at the presidential candidates and look at their positions on what many have identified as problems like health care. I think that it is also equally important that you actually do the research into where they get their opinion. An example is that supporters of universal health care site an article published by the School of Pubic Health at Harvard University that states that heart attack rates would decline if we had universal health care. The basis of the decline is a public pole with a question "If we had universal health care, would heart attack rates decline, yes or no" There was no clinical data to support their conclusion in the paper and they point it out but this information is never mentioned. This paper is then used as a reference to point out the flaws in lack of insurance coverage. I think that we will have Universal health insurance but it will be paid for by most of you who don't already have insurance between the ages of 18-45. This is the age group who will pay but not use any of the resources.