What is GOOGLE planning?

Interesting post but... I'm still not sending a big file out to "the cloud" only to have to retrieve it again. Considering a link to the net is the slowest connection you have, its inconvenient, wastes your bandwidth limit, and ultimately just slow.

There is also a difference between an automated file manager and taking away the ability altogether.
 
Interesting post but... I'm still not sending a big file out to "the cloud" only to have to retrieve it again. Considering a link to the net is the slowest connection you have, its inconvenient, wastes your bandwidth limit, and ultimately just slow.

There is also a difference between an automated file manager and taking away the ability altogether.

There are many options out there for transferring files onto your iDevice without using iTunes.

Here's one that I have used, JuiceDrop:
http://www.softpedia.com/get/Mobile-Phone-Tools/IPhone/JuiceDrop.shtml

AirSharing:
http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/air-sharing/id289943355?mt=8

i-FunBox:
desktop iPhone file browser

For photos/videos, PhotoSync
http://www.photosync-app.com/

For streaming access to media stored on your desktop: StreamToMe
http://projectswithlove.com/streamtome/index.html
It works remotely over Wifi and with 3G/4G
 
Interesting post but... I'm still not sending a big file out to "the cloud" only to have to retrieve it again. Considering a link to the net is the slowest connection you have, its inconvenient, wastes your bandwidth limit, and ultimately just slow.

There is also a difference between an automated file manager and taking away the ability altogether.

I wonder if anyone has read the end-user agreement with the apple cloud either.
You lose privacy when you transfer your data through someone else.
Who's to say Apple doesn't send your MP3 MD5 to RIAA?
 
Posting here 'cause if I posted in the Apple thread I'd be accused of being a hater...

The Biggest Threat To Apple Right Now

In July, we wrote that we were blown away with Google Now, the voice-controlled search service on the newest version of Android. The app is Google's answer to Siri.

Except it's better. Unlike Siri, Google Now can tap into Google's search engine and return better results. Unlike Siri, Google Now is a finished product that just works. And unlike Siri, Google Now is actually useful and accurate.


The article goes on...

This is the biggest problem with Apple cutting out all things Google from the iPhone. Google has had years to collect massive amounts of data from its users. As a hardware company, Apple has to hope others have the data it needs. Until recently, it relied on Google for that. Now its trying it's luck with other companies. That's not working.

In conclusion...

It's a disaster waiting to happen.

While forecasting the death of Apple has been a recipe for financial ruin so far, this article does make a valid point: if Apple is basing their future on data-driven apps (like Siri and Maps), then they have a lot of catching up to do if they can ever match Google.
 
NFC. I use NFC everyday with my Android Device.

Screen Size. It's funny Steve Jobs / Apple said that a 3.5" screen was perfect for humans, yet they increased the size to 4" on the iPhone5. I wonder why? lol...

iOS: aren't apple fans sick and tired of looking at the same screen since 2007.

Google Now: from all the reviews I've seen about this, Google Now is very fast and accurate. I can't wait until it can control more functions on the phone. For example Google>turn off wifi/bluetooth etc...

Notifications: Google has nailed this (they should sue Apple for copying this)

there are a ton more things to discuss...

I love what Google is doing with Docs/Drive. No more having to install Microsoft Word/Excel on every new computer.

Thank you google (but then again I am a Google fanboy)
 
Not really Google's fault.... but since Google owns Motorola I guess it is in a way...

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57526994-94/android-users-outraged-over-motorolas-broken-promise/

In short, Motorola had promised at least 18 months of OS upgradability for their 2011 Android phones. Last week they reneged on that promise leaving the owners of the Photon 4G, Electrify, and Atrix 4G stuck in Android 2.3 Gingerbread.

Bad.

Honestly, I think the vast majority of Android users don't care about upgrades. You buy the phone for what it does now, not on the hope of what it will do in the future. My phone is still on Gingerbread, but it does everything I want it to, and so I have no real need to upgrade. (As a nerd, I do have an admittedly irrational yearning to upgrade anyway, of course.)

Besides, I've had working voice turn-by-turn navigation for over two years now, and so it's been worth it :tongue:
 
Honestly, I think the vast majority of Android users don't care about upgrades. You buy the phone for what it does now, not on the hope of what it will do in the future. My phone is still on Gingerbread, but it does everything I want it to, and so I have no real need to upgrade. (As a nerd, I do have an admittedly irrational yearning to upgrade anyway, of course.)

Besides, I've had working voice turn-by-turn navigation for over two years now, and so it's been worth it :tongue:

Seems like this fragmentation and unpredictable OS upgradability issue IS A PROBLEM for some users:

http://www.gottabemobile.com/2012/03/27/temple-run-for-android-another-reason-to-run-from-android/

All the time people try to convince me that Android fragmentation isn’t a big issue. That most phones are running Android 2.3 Gingerbread, which to them, isn’t that big of a deal.

Try telling that to Droid RAZR and Droid Bionic owners that can’t play Temple Run on its big launch day, when owners of much older devices are able to enjoy the game.

When I buy a smartphone in December, I expect apps released at the end of March to work on my device. Plain and simple. Android doesn’t offer me that guarantee and it’s just another reason why I’ll always think twice about buying an Android smartphone.

Keep in mind that Motorola IS a member of the "so-called" Android Alliance which according to Wikipedia:

In 2011, Google partnered with a number of manufacturers and carriers to announce an "Android Update Alliance", pledging to deliver timely updates for every device for 18 months after its release.[94] As of 2012, this alliance has never been mentioned since.

Here's an ArsTechnica article about this Alliance and it's troubles:
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/06/what-happened-to-the-android-update-alliance/

Carrier meddling isn't the only thing keeping Android phones out of date—the smartphone manufacturers themselves are just as much to blame. Case in point, check out the brand-new Sony Xperia Ion we just reviewed: it's a fairly capable mid-tier smartphone with a dual-core Qualcomm MSM8260 that is more than capable of running Ice Cream Sandwich, and yet it was released running the year-and-a-half-old Gingerbread operating system with Android 4.0 promised at some nonspecific future date.

At best, this sort of behavior is lazy, and at worst it's an extremely disingenuous way to upsell consumers to higher-end handsets. It also shows just how little effect the Android Update Alliance has had on anyone's behavior, just in case Android 4.0's 7 percent install base left any doubt in your mind.

Looks like basically a roll of the dice whether the newest Android phone of today will be eligible for an OS update 4 months from now. This wouldnt be a problem if you bought the phone off contract and were willing to pay the full unsubsidized price for a new handset every 6 months. But when you are locked into a 2 year carrier contract this becomes a more expensive proposition...
 
Last edited:
4-inch Galaxy SIII coming tomorrow...

http://gizmodo.com/5950454/samsung-launching-new-four+inch-galaxy-s-iii

original.jpg


For those who want Jellybean without the bulk.
 
Forbes said:
Google earned a $9.03 per share profit before certain expenses, far below the $10.63 Wall Street consensus estimate, and down 20% from a year ago. GAAP profit was $6.53. Net revenues after paying partners for traffic were $11.53 billion, up 19% from a year ago. That also missed the Street’s estimate of $11.9 billion. Paid clicks, a key indicator, rose 33% from a year ago, and cost per click, another key measure but one whose meaning is murky, fell 15%.

So what happened? Here’s a quick assessment, which will be supplemented in a new post following the 1:30 p.m. Pacific earnings call:

* Costs jumped. They were up 71%, to $11.4 billion. It appears much of that increase came from Motorola Mobility, which Google acquired for $12.5 billion in May. After all, the acquisition added more than 20,000 employees. As Citi analyst Mark Mahaney said in a note to investors: “Bottom line divergence partly due to Amortization expenses, which came in at $317MM vs. our $197MM estimate. That contributed perhaps $0.40 of the EPS shortfall.”

* Motorola losses were huge. The unit posted a $527 million loss on a GAAP operating basis. Mahaney again: ”Another major delta was Motorola, which generated $151MM Op Loss vs. our $28MM estimate.”

* Ad revenue didn’t set records. It was up 16% from a year ago. Although lower cost per click isn’t always an indicator of a problem, in this case, the fourth consecutive decline has investors wondering anew if it’s due to the lower prices mobile ads get or even competition from the likes of Facebook.

Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster said in a note to investors that the core search business appeared to be the main culprit in the earnings miss: “Google sites revenue was up 2.5% q/q after being up an average of 8% q/q the past two years.” Added Mahaney: “We think the continued decline in CPCs is due to the impact of Ads Quality changes as well as due to increased Mobile queries.”

However, Mahaney and others say the shortfall from expectations, at least in Google’s core business was very small. So blame most of the problem on Motorola–no surprise there.

As for that early release? Google blamed its financial printer R.R. Donnelley for the early release, which was clearly a mistake, since the release includes the phrase “Pending Larry Quote,” in apparent reference to a planned quote from CEO Larry Page.

Perhaps their core business is finally slowing down or losing it to Microsoft's Bing.
 
Last edited:
New Chromebook

Ignoring the fact that the design is clearly stolen from the MacBook Air, a web-surfing, email-sending, youtube-viewing laptop for $249 is very compelling. Having to not deal with a full-blown OS like Windows or OSX is a nice concept for an IT guy like me.
 
Last edited:
Google had a little hiccup. The drop in stock price is a buying opportunity. If you own APPL, sell it and buy more GOOG. Throw in some MSFT too.
 
Just wanted to post this. As we argue the merits and demerits of iPhone vs Android vs Windows, take a step back and think about how magical all this technology truly is:

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.liveleak.com/ll_embed?f=f7b42cbf5b3b" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Anyone try googles new search app on iOS? It's pretty sweet. Much faster than Siri - at least for me it has been.
 
Anyone try googles new search app on iOS? It's pretty sweet. Much faster than Siri - at least for me it has been.

Yes, and it's more accurate too. For example, I tried to search for the nearest Pei Wei restaurant, and Siri kept thinking I was asking about "Payway" regardless of how I asked (I even tried spelling it out but to no avail). Google's search app understood what I was asking and returned correct results instantly. I think this is because Google knows I've searched for "pei wei" in the past and was able to use that stored information to provide a context for my search.
 
I love what Google is doing with Google Voice Search/Google NOW. We're getting closer and closer to the point where we are able to do complex tasks with our voices.


Just wanted to post this. As we argue the merits and demerits of iPhone vs Android vs Windows, take a step back and think about how magical all this technology truly is:

Agreed it's an amazing time.
 
Last edited:
Samsung Galaxy S III dethrones iPhone as world's top seller

Samsung Galaxy S III dethrones iPhone as world's top seller

For years tech pundits have been searching for an "iPhone" killer -- a mythical new device that would dethrone Apple's mighty handset as the most admired or popular smartphone.

It may be already here.


OK, but....

For the first time, Samsung's Galaxy S III overtook Apple's iPhone 4S to become the world's best-selling smartphone model for the third quarter (July through September) of 2012, according to new research by Strategy Analytics.

Nobody was buying iPhones throughout the summer 'cause everyone and their mother knew that the iPhone 5 was coming out.

But the Galaxy S III reign atop the sales rankings will likely be short-lived. As Strategy Analytics pointed out, iPhone 4S sales waned in the third quarter as consumers waited for the iPhone 5, which went on sale September 21.

Yep.

Nonetheless, AAPL is getting pummeled again today. Over $700 at the time of the iPhone 5 launch, down to $540 today. Painful.
 
I bought my wife a white galaxy note 2 and i got my first iphone, the iphone 5. If i had a purse i would have bought the note 2, its a beast!! It was painful to pick up the iphone after holding and playing with the note 2.:smile:
 
Back
Top