What expectations should I have for rear wheel dyno'd HP on a 3.0L with I/E/H, lightweight fly, short gears with R&P, and a new CTSC? Thanks.
I made 336 with a stock kit old whipple unit. Most guys are seeing 350 plus with the newer unitsWick said:What expectations should I have for rear wheel dyno'd HP on a 3.0L with I/E/H, lightweight fly, short gears with R&P, and a new CTSC? Thanks.
Why not? With a tunable ECM you can vary whatever you like in fuel & timing to get more productive gains. It's not unreasonable at all that you would get this increase.SPA_S2000 said:Mine made 359.
Im surprised that there is 30ish more whp avail on the base kit with tuning without upping boost and say 50 whp with tuning+higher boost.
D'Ecosse said:Why not? With a tunable ECM you can vary whatever you like in fuel & timing to get more productive gains. It's not unreasonable at all that you would get this increase.
BadCarma said:Ken hit the button, with the AEM as a base aftermarket ECU,ESM,ECM whatever you prefer to call it you have so much more in terms of finite programmable tuning.when you get to the point that you are aware of your cars minor differences from cylinder to cylinder and have the ability to address the A/F independent of the whole the efficiency buys you alot of power. lucky guys!
MiamieNeSeX said:Also more room to blow up the car, hence adding more whining to this website:biggrin:
Armando
SPA_S2000 said:Mine made 359.
Im surprised that there is 30ish more whp avail on the base kit with tuning without upping boost and say 50 whp with tuning+higher boost.
dynomike said:The base comptech autorotor kits we are seeing in the 345to 355 range. We just did a 2005 high boost with my engine management solution on 8lbs of boost the car made 406whp. With just tuning with the stock boost level from comptech the car made 30 more whp.
Base comptech kit@ 6lbs: 352whp
comptech kit@6lbs with AEM tuned 382whp
Comtech kit @8lbs with AEM tuned 406whp
The car runs strong
SPA_S2000 said:Ah okay.
I was assuming that since you are not increasing boost, you are not increasing risk. My surprise was because I believed that tuning the 6lb base kit yielded 30whp of RISKLESS power. I see that is not correct.
BadCarma said:Armando, no arguement here in that respect...hehe what would the F/I N20 forum look like without whiners. not enough gains,to much gains,I dont get all this tuning stuff, NOBODY warned me this could happen! I have not heard you whine about all the power you make off your insane ride.whine Armando whine,you are not filling your Quota :biggrin: BTW hows the big dog running these days?
Again, I respectfully I disagree - I think there's probably less risk since the tuning is precise throughout the rev range and done specifically for the conditions. Remember these is very little tuning ability on the as-delivered Comptech kit. You are reliant on a few 'tricks' to make the OEM components work beyond their intended conditions i.e. fooling the ECM into thinking that everything is still stock, and artificially forcing more gas in there by utilizing a higher pressure.SPA_S2000 said:Ah okay.
I was assuming that since you are not increasing boost, you are not increasing risk. My surprise was because I believed that tuning the 6lb base kit yielded 30whp of RISKLESS power. I see that is not correct.
Aahhh - Hoping none of the Turbos show then? <!--StartFragment -->MiamieNeSeX said:.... Basically getting ready for NSXPO06 bragging rights .....
D'Ecosse said:Aahhh - Hoping none of the Turbos show then? <!--StartFragment -->
Ken is right again concerning the tuning of a base Comptech unit. the way it gains higher fuel pressure to achieve proper A/F is not that different then an N20 dry setup, tricking the system to bump fuel up by applying added pressure on the FPR diaphram? it is the way they tune is it not,correct me if I am wrong here. it works pretty well most of the time but you are increasing the duty cycle of the injectors and that being said without opening a can of worms anything above 80% duty is considered a risk by some of the industrie's top notch injector pro's like RC engineering,yes I have read page after page of tuners like Andy (SAINT) that they can handle max out duty without a hiccup but I believe that if you do rely on the same tricks I use with n20 for your fuel tuning and they are as stated almost identical tuning tricks you had better understand them. if you do a search you WILL find folks that beat their heads against the wall to achieve a solid fuel map and constant safe trim without those pesky hard to tune spikes that dont last long but overtime who knows ? and what are the the long term effects of jumping the fuel pump up to max voltage all the time,I dont have much chioce in the matter for my fuel tune but if I go S/C and I am trying darn hard to scrape up the cash you had better believe I will go after market ECU and wash my hands of tricking the stock ecu. anything to say about this by allmeans chime in and set me straight. I am eager to learn.D'Ecosse said:Again, I respectfully I disagree - I think there's probably less risk since the tuning is precise throughout the rev range and done specifically for the conditions. Remember these is very little tuning ability on the as-delivered Comptech kit.
You are reliant on a few 'tricks' to make the OEM components work beyond their intended conditions i.e. fooling the ECM into thinking that everything is still stock, and artificially forcing more gas in there by utilizing a higher pressure.
.
len3.8 said::biggrin:
He is talking about bragging rights among SC cars.
Or his hurdle is placed in the High Jump Pit.
Yeah I said it.:biggrin:
Bob Kenney said:As we start flirting with 400 HP and above the use of the term "relative safety" is being applied only to the ability of an after market ECU to control air/fuel ratios and timing advance to prevent detonation.
Should we also discuss the additional stress of the added HP on the internal engine components [engine pressure and temperatures]? At what point do we cross the line of being "reasonable safe" on stock internals?
I lot of us have looked to the bottom end of our engines before going much above 400 HP. At some point the stock cast pistons, at 10.2 compression ratios, won't handle the combined heat and pressure increases. Would anyone care to guess where that threshold is or do we play "you bet your engine" to find out?
Bob
BioBanker said:I learn so much every time I log on.
I guess Mike is the best one to answer this question as he tuned the 05 described above.
When you tuned that car with only the base kit on it and your EMS, was the engine running with greater safety margin, in your opinion, under the parameters that had it put down 382whp than the untuned base kit was when it put down 353whp? ie, can my 6lb kit be tuned with your EMS to put about 30whp more with higher safety margin? Are there specific parameters that we can look at to determine which is running "safer"?