Edwardo said:When I said he could have used a gun to "resolve" his problem, I meant that he could defend himself from his attackers.
In other words, his life was clearly in danger, and thus he could use a weapon (a gun) to defend himself so that he could defend his life (which it appears he may lose as a result of this incident).
I am not sure how you come to the conclusion that because I said he could have hopefully "resolved" the situation by defending himself with a firearm, that it is somehow ok to "resolve" unemployment with a gun.
Are you saying that defending yourself with a gun is the same as executing unemployed people with a gun? I hope not LOL!
I would think that he lives because nobody or he didn't carry a gun.
You think if he has a gun the other side don't incline to shoot him?