Re: And the conclusion is??
I was wondering the same. When Vettel got pole in China and Horner was heard on the radio saying "what adjustable ride height", to me it felt like they had pulled off another pole minus whatever system they were using and not an emphatic cry of success due to never having a ride-height system which SpeedTV's announcers believed.Maybe I'm not doing my homework, but I still have not come across anyone with certain knowledge or even a 2nd plausible theory of how Red Bull's suspected system actually worked. I only heard about the "slow pressure leaking" shock theory, which the scrutineers should have been able to find/confirm. Apparently they have not.
Whitmarsh was seemingly quite forthcoming in saying they were working on one and have stopped based on the FIA statement reinforcing the intent, if not the detail of the rule. But last I heard, Christen Horner flatly denied they had any such system.
And Red Bull had some vague but somewhat believable explanation of tire wear(probably setup?) and strategy that scuttled their race chances. Which holds some water when Bridgestone noted a huge disparity in tire wear amongst the teams and from one driver to another in the same team, with JB and Hamo being the most glaring example.
So the quesiton is still hanging AFAIK. Anyone have a link to a reliable source and definitive explanation?