Originally posted by nsxtasy:
Frankly, I have yet to hear a compelling reason why I would want to reveal detailed information about my own NSX
In spite of the fact that I resurrected this topic, I have to agree with you .. I had not given much thought to the benefits or who would receive them and I'm not sure that the answer is obvious.
I'm certainly not an expert on the topic but I think that most registry's are started with the objective of documenting a car's history for the sole purpose of making valuations and/or subsequent buying decisions more informed. However, I don't deny that the ability to contact owners for any group-oriented purposes (such as local events; special vendor offers; etc) may be a useful thing.
The first of these is clearly one of those times when we contribute individually for the greater good of the community. This is not unlike the intent of NSXPrime itself, I think. Besides, we never know when we might be on the receiving end of this purchasing act either voluntarily or involuntarily (due to accident/theft/etc).
I'm not sure that we need to wait for Lud's offering in order to have the debate about what the value is or what should be public domain information and what should be private domain. In spite of whatever work he has put into it so far, I'm sure he would
not turn down suggestions from the group.
Having said that, it was my view that any current owner information (name, phone#, etc) would likely not be part of any publically available registry. However, NSXPrime id's; eBay id's; and I would suggest that even email id's should be appropriate since we allow email contact through Prime today. A person can chose to respond or ignore it and generally (hacking aside), no other personal information is available. I would also suggest that the owner's city name is likely acceptable (especially for event locale filtering) but not any other address info including phone number.
The topic of who would maintain it is thorny because I think most registry's are maintained by a recognized, formal, neutral organization (which in this case would suggest NSXCA) but it appears to me that the NSXCA only does things which benefit their members and are accessible to their members whereas much of the data in such a registry would be submitted from the larger community which would justifiable want access to it.
So I think the NSXCA would either have to be the collector/caretaker yet make it generally available, or maybe one or more people in the general community could be the collector/caretaker but have NSXCA be the 'validator' of some of it (as I mentioned in my first response) in addition to providing some of it on behalf of their members.
Although Prime could certainly be the point of access, I'm not suggesting that we would want to burden Lud with the task of creating/maintaining the information, although there would certainly have to be some co-ordination if he was to provide the access point.
Getting back to your original point, I'm not sure that any of the registry's provide a strong benefit to the individual owners and some of the information may have been collected without their participation but over time, I would hope that (a) if you have an adequate policy on what's private and what isn't, and (b) you make it easy enough for people to participate voluntarily, then I'd hope most would do it. If costs of contacting the NSXCA membership is an issue, I presume it would be acceptable to just include the request in any membership renewal mail-outs.
...Ian
------------------
- Ian
91 Blk/Blk daily driver; 100K+ miles & still going strong