the beast is alive - 3.5L twin turbocharged carbon fiber widebody NSX

[ScienceofSpeed]

Keep it coming! If you guess in WHP, we will convert to crankshaft using the 12% drivetrain loss factor. (ie. Brian's guess of 709 whp is 806 hp at the crankshaft).

-- Chris

 

[docjohn]

was this seth's old car?

 

[clr1024]

835 at the fly!

 

[joboy77]

723hp and 550tq

 

[kookoo4nsx]

818 crank HP.

 

[bruce91nsx]

768 whp.
that would be about 873 at the crank, I believe...
...I saw some of the 3" exhaust work when I visited your shop a month ago... so awesomely big and just beautiful work!
--bruce
p.s. I could really make use of the SOS gift certificate!

 

[ScienceofSpeed]

Good guesses ... someone will win!

BTW, your guesses will be considered "at the fly" unless you specify otherwise at the wheels.

-- Chris

 

[tucsonsx]

690 rwhp

 

[liftnot]

705whp

 

[Moses]

711whp

 

[synergy004]

693.3 whp

 

[L_RAO]

679 whp on E85.

 

[CDX_NSX]

780 hp.

 

[Bram]

My guess would be 808...


Bram

 

[RJD1022]

822 HP at the fly

 

[dablackgoku1234]

801 at the crank

 

[SaleenS7Rs]

715 whp

 

[TurboD16]

Taking Hugh's into account. 666...

666*12%=746 + a couple for good measure.

750 hp

 

[stevieray122854]

745 rwhp.

 

[Bui]

805 at crank

 

[DRIFTER]

777 crank

 

[DELTACREW]

716whp

 

[bruce91nsx]

We also could comment on the OP's original photo.

I thought it was simply just a nice, new variation of the rear of an NSX,
perhaps a better, nicer view of something new and innovative.

A view, the OP said, that was:

(shown with diffuser removed)

hah!

--bruce
p.s. Whoever shot it did a really nice job. It shows everything in detail;
it is nicely lit and is nicely composed.

 

[MetalSpikeRacing]

So sick.

756 crank HP.

-MSR

 

[kookoo4nsx]

WOAH! that's like 840 at the crank. That would be sick!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

745 rwhp.