Caymen S is very very well rated by the car mags. The problem is..............The S begins pricing at 65k. Add a few simple options and you are pushing 95k............which is now into 911 territory which makes for a very hard decision.
i love my cayman s and i love my nsx. if you can have an nsx (or 2), I'd definitely take the cayman over a third nsx
I see Caymans, Boxsters and 911 everyday. Majority seems to be driven by ladies.
Therefore, if people want to attract girls, then go with the Porsche.
If people want to attract guys, then go with the NSX LOL.
I think it's a true statement.
For the OP, car selection is going to be very subjective. Both NSX and Porsche looks nice.
interior seems a bit too cramped/cockpit style for me (and by no means am i a tall guy).
I own a 1991 NSX with 26K miles and an '07 Cayman S that now has 25K miles. I really do like both cars and they both have their attributes. My NSX seems more refined even though it's 22 years old. Hands down, the Porsche sounds better. Both handle great and are fairly quick. Not worried about the reliability on the NSX but yet Consumer Reports rates the Cayman as an extremely reliable vehicle as well. I have had zero issues with mine.
Agree on the previous post about the sloppy shifting on the Cayman. I put the Short Shift Kit in 281123779818281123779818 and it now shifts as nice as my S2000 which is the best manual transmission I have ever flogged. It completely blows me away why Porsche did not put the SSK in the car from the factory. It's a shame because the difference is literally night & day.
If I were to rate my cars: NSX>Cayman>S2000. All three really are great cars but the NSX is special. The S2000 really would be special as well if it were a little more torquey. If it don't rev, it don't go. Completely dependent on RPM's.