Yet another objection charged thread about the replacement for the NSX...
Lots of calls for "Noooooo... Don't do it!"
I know a lot of us are curious about the next car, and I know that I have thrown my hat into the ring more than once to speculate on what we will eventually get.
I have said before, and feel fairly confident to repeat- I am of the belief that this R&T article is on target. Given the offerings of the competition I think it is entirely reasonable that Acura will produce a halo vehicle that features AWD, and a front mounted engine.
It won't be a step up from the NSX, and it won't be a step down- It will be a different car built for a different purpose, falling into a different catagory.
Like the M6 (I would draw parallels...)
In 1991 Honda set forth to prove their VTEC performance technology packaged into a handbuilt exotic car could run with the best sports vehicles in the world, and compete. In 1991 they were successful with the NSX. I think we can all agree that over the 15 years of production the NSX grew long in the tooth, and eventually even some inferior cars that it was never supposed to compete with surpassed the NSX in performance (see:Corvette Z06). After 15 years in production, Honda put the NSX to bed, leaving us to speculate: What comes next?
Today Honda is about technology- gadgetry. The new cars aren't about getting lighter, faster, and more nimble. The new cars are packaging electronics, driving aids, and interface. The current RL instrumentation bears resemblance to a cockpit from the Jetsons- guage cluster read outs, touch screen buttons, sat nav with traffic updates, and voice commands- Safety? Airbags everywhere- front, side, and side curtain bags- a virtual cocoon of safety... 15 years ago you couldn't get all that technology in one car- you couldn't even get it 5 years ago. Every model in the line contains some high techery- from the RSX, and TSX up through the MDX SUV.
The brand image of the company is migrating from going fast to going safe, and secure-
So I ask- Will the next high technology platform be a stripped down, light weight, mid engined sportscar?
What technology would such a vehicle demonstrate that could trickle down to you average products? What point would it prove?
It wouldn't.
There are those of us who will mourn the winds of change, and that is perfectly understandable. For those people fortunate enough to own, or have access to an NSX we have the greatness of the last project to embrace. Aren't you all so glad the NSX ended up being what it is?
I would like to cast a vote for satisfaction with the existing model, because i am very pleased to be able to go out and enjoy it.
It represents one of many highpoints in the automotive lexicon. I think it is a great car every time I get behind the wheel.
I also think it is a point that has been proven for Honda/Acura, so I accept the idea that the next car may not be a direct decendant.
This is part of the reason I am also comfortable with the car NOT being called NSX.
I also never liked the HSC- it just seems to be "missing something".
Flame suit on.
Philip
P.S.- and of course the disclaimer- I would be happy to be wrong.