Originally posted by nsxtasy:
It's not because it's by a 15 year old. It's because it's by an amateur.
After all, the students at the top college programs in industrial design are only a few years older than that. But instead of a drawing, they are trained to examine all the engineering that is needed for a design to be practical and feasible as well - and to do so at a level of detail that is highly unlikely from someone without such training.
If you would like to see just a little bit about what students in a good industrial design program are capable of, check out the new (October 14) AutoWeek and their description of the efforts of three students at the Detroit College of Creative Studies in a competition sponsored by the American Iron and Steel Institute. While you can read about the competition on the Institute's website here and see the models here (which you may or may not like), the AutoWeek article talks about how these students have engineered various components underneath the skin - with far more detail than is likely from a novice's design. By comparison, a design without such detail is indeed more akin to a doodle.
Yea, but here in this age where 11 year olds can go to college and many self tought musicans shine... etc, you can't just assume one's work inferior or insignificant just because one's age. A teenager may very well be fascinated with an task ever since he/she was a little because that's their parent's profession. And I know of many younger individuals who produce/achieve better product/success because of it, regardless of their age.
[This message has been edited by Zuerst (edited 10 October 2002).]