Lexus IS official pricing

steveny said:
looks very Bangle to me. I like it!

Chris Bangle strikes again! I love his work! I hope he has a huge hand in designing the new NSX.
 
Anyone know if this will be available in the Sportcross (wagon) version that was in the is300 model portfolio? I can't see it in any of the pre-release info ...
 
D'Ecosse said:
Anyone know if this will be available in the Sportcross (wagon) version that was in the is300 model portfolio? I can't see it in any of the pre-release info ...

I haven't seen or heard anything about that, but that doesn't mean it won't happen.
 
man, I had a chance at driving one over the weekend for the Taste of Lexus Chicago...too bad I had to cancel it & attend a wedding...definately looks sharp though, I wouldn't mind trading in my TL for the IS350 :smile:
 
Da Hapa said:
Not a knock or flame, merely an observation.

I'm amazed at how perceptions can be so different from person to person. The current generation Accord, IMO, is a great car but can't hold a candle to the GS in terms of quality of materials, fit and finish, or build quality.

I don't know what an LX430 is, I suspect you meant either the old 450 or a current 470 but the Lexus version of the Landcruiser is universally acknowledged to be one of the best build SUV's in the world. Moreover, the interior quality in particular really stands out. We nearly bought one (now that gas is $3.50/gal. I'm glad we didn't) and we thought they were spectacular.

Again, just an observation.

Ah I'm sorry i meant the LX 470 :tongue:
I do agree that it is a matter of perception. I was curious if you have seen &/or driven the new GS? I personally feel that the acuras' level of quality is much higher than the GS/RX/ES line up. The Lexus's feel too cheap for the price one is paying for them.

Also Lexus has a long ways to go before they can start knocking on BMW's door.

Again this is just my opinion so flame suit on :cool: :biggrin:

Does anyone else see a close resemblence between the GS design and hyundai's design???
 
NsSeX said:
Ah I'm sorry i meant the LX 470 :tongue:
I do agree that it is a matter of perception. I was curious if you have seen &/or driven the new GS? I personally feel that the acuras' level of quality is much higher than the GS/RX/ES line up. The Lexus's feel too cheap for the price one is paying for them.

To each their own but IMO, even the loaner RX's that I've driven (which tend to get really beat up) have nicer quality interiors and feel better screwed together than the loaner MDX's I've driven.

I haven't yet driven the current GS but I've sat in a few while waiting for my car to be done. I think the car is very nicely done.

I've spent a lot of time behind the wheel of the last gen GS430 and while it's not my cup of tea, I'd be hard pressed to call that anything but a quality piece.

But that's just me.
 
D'Ecosse said:
Anyone know if this will be available in the Sportcross (wagon) version that was in the is300 model portfolio? I can't see it in any of the pre-release info ...

Nothing official has been announced but PR has suggested and rumours abound that Lexus will be offering a coupe, convertible and wagon version of the new IS to better compete with the BMW offerings. A hopped up version with a V8 has been photographed looping the "Ring in Germany as well.

Of all those, I would think the wagon is perhaps the least likely to make it as America still tends to favor big, gas guzzling SUV's over efficient wagons.

I think the wagon would be bad ass.
 
liftshard said:
It's still not and never will be a BMW. Expect good first-year sales, and then a marked decline, petering out at end of model cycle, where they repeat.

The TL will continue to outsell all the rest by a landslide. People buying japlux cars want a VALUE proposition to trade for the prestige they've given up. Acura and Infiniti are basically equivalent in everyone's minds. When people think Infiniti, they think of the G35, either sedan or coupe. Acura, people think TL. W/ Lexus, hmm...they don't seem to have a defining car and they price themselves like they think they're BMW, but they clearly aren't. Their best entries are when they price at a significant discount to German with no other Japanese competition, like the LS and the other SUVs. The RX has been their sales leader for some time and a small sports sedan, even with an enviable 306hp, isn't going to dent the roundel.
QUOTE]

I'll go out on a limb and place on an online bet with you that you're dead wrong.

I'm a Honda guy but most people that I know don't think of Acura in the same breath as MB or BMW. They do with Lexus. And yes, Infiniti is making great strides with the FX, G and new M. But the Q still doesn't sell at all and the big sport ute is languishing on lots. Infiniti is making strides but it's behind still.

Toyota has done a great job of kicking just about anyone's butt that they try to. Their first offering may not be a home run (witness the T100 or even the first IS) but they usually get it right by the second run.

I love the way the G35 drives but the car still feels very cheap to me inside and out. I've not sat in one but what I've read suggests that the new IS sets new standards for this class.

Combine Toyota reliability, with real luxury, the Lexus ownership experience and some actual performance (most Americans only get wowed by straight line acceleration anyway) and I bet the new IS sells well.

I wouldn't bet against Toyota.
 
donwon said:
Anyone know what kind of warranty do these come with?

4 year 50k, just like the rest of the Lexus lineup.

And I'd like to see the sales numbers for the ES330 versus the TL - I bet Lexus wins that battle. The old IS should be compared to the TSX.
 
donwon said:
LeftLane said:
4 year 50k, just like the rest of the Lexus lineup.QUOTE]

Sorry, but is recommended maintenance included in that like BMW and Audi? If so, thats really something worth considering.

Nope - still a competitive disadvantage for Lexus. They do not cover recommended maintenance.
 
I took my Touareg in for service on Monday. I have been feeling air escaping from the climate control duct work into the cabin around the passengers door b-pillar where the door meet the pillar. VW told me today fit and finish warranty only last 12 months or 12k miles. I have taken the vehicle in for the same problem within the first 12 months or 12k and they still say no dice.
I really like the Touareg but the service sucks. I had to call the GM up today to get my window tint replaced because they gouged the tint last time the vehicle was in for service. VW dealer says they didn't do it. I gave them a receipt for the tinting which was done 2 days before I took the vehicle in. :rolleyes: After a 1/2 hour on the phone they agreed to fix it. They also dented the brushed aluminum trim on the dash last visit. :mad: What a bunch of monkeys.
I had new tires installed on this visit and told the service manager in advance that I took pictures of all four wheels in perfect condition before I brought the car in!
 
steveny said:
I took my Touareg in for service on Monday. I have been feeling air escaping from the climate control duct work into the cabin around the passengers door b-pillar where the door meet the pillar. VW told me today fit and finish warranty only last 12 months or 12k miles. I have taken the vehicle in for the same problem within the first 12 months or 12k and they still say no dice.

Wow - even GM is better than that. I took my 03 Suburban in for a few warranty items at 35,500 miles (expires at 36k), and the service advisor went over my car in detail because he said the trim items will be out of warranty soon and he wanted to take care of any little squeaks or rattles now if they could find them. He also documented a few things that we couldn't reproduce at the dealership, just so it would be covered later even when I was out of my warranty coverage.

Really makes you want to spend $75 large for a Phaeton, huh? :frown:
 
supra2nv said:
I have been seriously shopping the car. MSRP on the window says $42.8k for the top of the line IS350. not sure how the price is so different from what is posted here.

Because there are a TON of options. That sucks. Why can't it just be like the TL. The only option on the TL is NAV. For the IS350, the list goes on and on and on....
 
NetViper said:
Because there are a TON of options. That sucks. Why can't it just be like the TL. The only option on the TL is NAV. For the IS350, the list goes on and on and on....

You should see the list of options if you ever decide to buy a new Porsche.... :eek:

You're right, that's what makes the TL (and other Acuras) such a great deal. You don't have to get excited about a $32k car and then find out it's a stripper. BMW has perfected that art. Leatherette, anyone? :tongue:
 
LeftLane said:
Nope - still a competitive disadvantage for Lexus. They do not cover recommended maintenance.

And the MSRP reflects that difference.

BTW - I believe the 4/50 quoted herein is bumper to bumper only. Powertrain is longer.
 
Dave Hardy said:
Loved the old IS (except for the taillights). This one not so much. I agree it looks bangleriffic, but that's a bad thing IMO.

I've done no research on these, but I do remember that the IS300 came with an auto only at the beginning, but they added a manual in the second or third year.

Glad to see someone with sense in this thread! Jk...although looks are all personal preference...

This is one of the only if only car that i've seen an agreed consensus that the car is superior to its predecessor in looks and i disagree

The old IS300 is much cleaner, a nice black one with some wheels of your choosing will always own this new weak 'IS350' for 45+ grand! Give me a break!
 
Da Hapa said:
And the MSRP reflects that difference.

BTW - I believe the 4/50 quoted herein is bumper to bumper only. Powertrain is longer.

Disagree on the first point, agree on the second. We just bought an 05 GX470 and paid right around $50k. At that price point and level of car, almost all the of the competitors include scheduled maintenance. I don't feel like I got a discount just because I now pay for my own service.
 
NetViper said:
Because there are a TON of options. That sucks. Why can't it just be like the TL. The only option on the TL is NAV. For the IS350, the list goes on and on and on....

Different strokes I suppose. That is one of the reasons I don't like the TL. You're forced to buy a bunch of crap that you may or may not want. I don't want to go back to the days of the 55 Chevy, where seats were an option, but I think way too much crap is standard these days. Give me roll up windows, manual locks, and no air bags please. I hate that 3000# is considered light these days, and I hate that $20,000 is considered cheap. I absolutely love my CRX Si, which cost $8,000 new and weighs 2200#. I wish they still made cars like it.
 
LeftLane said:
Disagree on the first point, agree on the second. We just bought an 05 GX470 and paid right around $50k. At that price point and level of car, almost all the of the competitors include scheduled maintenance. I don't feel like I got a discount just because I now pay for my own service.


Acura doesn't offer a big V8 powered 5+ passenger SUV but they don't offer scheduled maint.

Infiniti's big, V8 Lux SUV (based on the Armada and I don't know the name) is priced similarly (similarily equipped) and doesn't offer scheduled maint.

MB's new ML isn't as big as the GX but it's offered in V8 form and can seat 5+ with the third row seat and optioned up the same, I'm pretty sure it's quite a bit more than the $50K price point you mentioned. The G wagon is a lot more.

BMW's X5 V8 (also not as big as the GX) and I don't think it seats more than 5 is also quite a bit more expensive than the $50K you mentioned when similarily equipped (I think they start at $54 or $55K and that's without any options).
 
Dave Hardy said:
Different strokes I suppose. That is one of the reasons I don't like the TL. You're forced to buy a bunch of crap that you may or may not want. I don't want to go back to the days of the 55 Chevy, where seats were an option, but I think way too much crap is standard these days. Give me roll up windows, manual locks, and no air bags please. I hate that 3000# is considered light these days, and I hate that $20,000 is considered cheap. I absolutely love my CRX Si, which cost $8,000 new and weighs 2200#. I wish they still made cars like it.
I agree with everything but the airbags. :biggrin:
 
I'll go out on a limb and place on an online bet with you that you're dead wrong.

I'm a Honda guy but most people that I know don't think of Acura in the same breath as MB or BMW. They do with Lexus. And yes, Infiniti is making great strides with the FX, G and new M. But the Q still doesn't sell at all and the big sport ute is languishing on lots. Infiniti is making strides but it's behind still.

What is the bet? The 3-series will outsell this car by a mile. It is, does, and will continue to.

Lexus is simply NOT thought of as on par with BMW. Period. Lexus does offer a prestige increase over Infiniti or Acura, but they are just not BMW anymore than BMW is MB. Lexus cars are CHEAPER than either of the two German marques for a REASON.

Combine Toyota reliability, with real luxury, the Lexus ownership experience and some actual performance (most Americans only get wowed by straight line acceleration anyway) and I bet the new IS sells well.

I bet it sells well initially and then, REALITY sets in. It's still not a BMW.

I wouldn't bet against Toyota.

Huh? I would. I bet on the Accord and Civic in the NA market because, absent fleet sales, they are the #1 sellers in their prospective niches. Honda had 38 "10 best" models in a decade. Toyota is a fine company which produces a fine product but this particular market space is EXCEEDINGLY competitive and is dominated by two cars, the BMW 3- and the Acura TL. Making serious inroads into this space is going to be HARD to do. The TL is the value buy in this space and the 3- is the prestige buy. Everyone else takes second place. The G35 sedan is a fine car but the TL is on another planet, sales-wise. The current IS isn't even a blip on the screen and it will be hard for Lexus to penetrate this space because Acura has done such a good job with their particular product.

Sorry, but right now, Lexus is in no-man's land. Their cars are too expensive to compete with the better values offered by their Japanese competition and they do not have quite the prestige of the Germans. Look at the sales data over the last 10 years if you do not believe me. Toyota is a great company, but they cannot work miracles. Everyone must know where they are on the pecking order. A $40,000 compact? Who WOULDN'T get a 330?
 
Back
Top