In my opinion nothing in this world is guaranteed. If the market tanks, companies cut back and eventually yields get hit. What about the folks that owned these companies before 2008. If you owned LINE at $40, you would have lost almost everything in 2008.
There is no question that these companies have performed well since hitting "the bottom". During recessions you would expect value based companies to be the best performing and the ones you mentioned are all somewhat value based; though LINE and KMP's potential earnings growth for 2011 are impressive at 17 and 21% with LINE outperforming the other two with stronger profit margins.
Even near retirement, I think every portfolio should have some growth companies even if its just a small percentage.
With that said, growth companies have done even better since the 2008 rebound. Since "the bottom", the tech sector has performed with Apple (AAPL) having a 376%+ return with iPOD mania (I don't own one and don't plan to; its just another toy). The "cloud computing" companies such as Rackspace (RAX) with a 625% return since 2008. In my opinion that lifted the networking sector such as F5 (FFIV) and the data warehousing (NZ). Online video has been popular with Liberty Media (LCAPA). Netflix (NFLX) has had a good run. Gold companies such as AEM have performed well (200+%) since 2008; though I try to avoid anything related to the commodities market.
I'm not one for chasing returns but if the company has good growth potential and the balance sheet looks good, why not? Find a good base entry point, and have an exit strategy. If you do that the risk is low.
I would love to open up a short position on the "new" GM today.
Sure wish I was one of those guys who could buy Linkedin at $45
Sure wish I was one of those guys who could buy Linkedin at $45
A $45 yeah. But now with a P/E of 50+, the only thing I would do is short it.
Edit, googling around, it looks like the P/E is over 500!!!!!
That's the downside of being in first, is you can't sell, and it's guaranteed to plummet from here.
I bet it's at $40 by the end of July.
Nice AAPL jump.
Nice AAPL jump.
Question IMO, is the next stop $400/share?
Question IMO, is the next stop $400/share?
If I had more guts I would short apple.
..and been blown out $50 a share. People have been trying to short AAPL for the past 3 years. Everyone of them is in some trader graveyard with the other guys who've been trying to short the yen for the past 15 years.
They've beaten earnings every quarter for half a decade. Their P/E still isn't all that high and their balance sheet is impeccable. Why you'd get short AAPL instead of NFLX or some other questionable company is beyond me.
Don't fight the trend my friend! And the risk vs reward is terrible getting short AAPL in the 500's unless you think the entire market is going to be crushed. And even then, AAPL has so much cash per share and such a great balance sheet it will go down less than the vast majority of other firms. I haven't bought AAPL since it was <$100 and have sold out of all but a small piece (limit sell at $648.75) but I wouldn't go short.
WDC makes hard drives and those devices will eventually be replaced by flash memory. It's a dying industry and the reason for their stock price to rise was due to the flood in Thailand, I think their customers ordered more of their stuff to offset shortages.
Due to this reason it's not a long term investement, you need to get in and get out fast, not buy and hold.
You need to find the next boom and invest in those stocks.
Try INTC, MSFT or CSCO for large cap.
Or BRCM, JDSU, FFIV, or NVDA for more spec plays.
Whether true or not, how does a phenomenal earnings report suddenly change any of it? Would it have gone up on a bad earnings report? Damned if you do, damned if you don't.