For the white car pictured I may not have looked close enough to notice it's the Toyobaru thing, .
:wink: This is the Toyobaru (FT-86) with FR layout, and it's targeting drift fans at price 25K range.
For the white car pictured I may not have looked close enough to notice it's the Toyobaru thing, .
:wink: FYI
:wink: FYI (Re: First Two Pics of HSV in street trim)
Honda basically doesn't release their concepts until long after spy shots have already shown what their products will look like, no? So it's not as if we can expect much of a surprise from them.
For the white car pictured I may not have looked close enough to notice it's the Toyobaru thing, but whether it's that or the Honda sportscar in the March Road & Track (teal car, that looks close enough to pretty much all the other $30K-ish concepts), they're all non-exotic, and judging by their mundane looks, meant to compete with Z cars and the like, and most probably share their chassis with sedans or coupes.
As for the red car (not the chopped-top Lexus), it certainly mirrors an Accord - sideview/front end/taillights/roofline; check out the badges front and back - they look like they say "H" to me.
Nothing is impossible. If they are planning a very limited production run of the JCTC model -- it just might happen. But they might also cost $500K.
I guessed that FR layout has been canceled.
As a follow up to my initial post,
Today President and Director of Honda R&D Co. Ltd., Mr. Tomohiko Kanawabe was interviewed at Geneva Motor Show 2011. When asked how Honda's sporting/racing heritage will be incorporated in future models, he responded
"Motor racing and sports cars have always been an essential part of Honda's DNA. It's too early to talk about specific replacements for sporting models such as the Civic Type R, the S2000 and the NSX but you can be sure we are actively involved right now in evaluating and analysing just how our sporting DNA can be incorporated into our future model range."
Honda knows better than to ever try and sell a car costing 500k. Heck I can hardly believe the LFA was built - that's insane too. If Honda does something like that it will sell in tiny little bits. If they produced 500 they'd all sell I guess but even the LFA - has had to revise their position on leasing only for the first 2 years cause not many are buying.
Yeah, but if its only a technicality to satisfy homologation guidelines they won't care. Its just sort of a loophole. Make as few as you absolutely must to say "yeah see, production car" and then charge cost for them. If they can get away with a tiny number (not sure what "qualifies" as "production"), I am very sure they could unload them all just to billionaire collectors (of which there are tons)
Personally, I think thats total BS though. Why should that sort of short cut approach allow a company to compete on the track with companies like BMW, Porsche and GM that are the real deal? Seems very unfair.
As for "NSX 2", I agree that unless it is a MR, I personally have less than 0 interest. I also think that unless there is a *clear* heritage link, it's just another new car.
That, is where Japan fails epically IMO. They have *zero* clue what legacy is about. Fanboys will make excuses, but when you look at the heritage of Japanese marques against Porsche, BMW, Corvette, Ferrari... It's laughable. They have no attention span and then they spin off one off pet projects, kill them, and then try again a decade later with no linkage to the past (and sometimes a bastardization of the brand)
To me the Audi R8 is probably the closest thing to an "NSX 2" ironically.
Yeah, but if its only a technicality to satisfy homologation guidelines they won't care. Its just sort of a loophole. Make as few as you absolutely must to say "yeah see, production car" and then charge cost for them. If they can get away with a tiny number (not sure what "qualifies" as "production"), I am very sure they could unload them all just to billionaire collectors (of which there are tons)
Personally, I think thats total BS though. Why should that sort of short cut approach allow a company to compete on the track with companies like BMW, Porsche and GM that are the real deal? Seems very unfair.
As for "NSX 2", I agree that unless it is a MR, I personally have less than 0 interest. I also think that unless there is a *clear* heritage link, it's just another new car.
That, is where Japan fails epically IMO. They have *zero* clue what legacy is about. Fanboys will make excuses, but when you look at the heritage of Japanese marques against Porsche, BMW, Corvette, Ferrari... It's laughable. They have no attention span and then they spin off one off pet projects, kill them, and then try again a decade later with no linkage to the past (and sometimes a bastardization of the brand)
To me the Audi R8 is probably the closest thing to an "NSX 2" ironically.
So did Honda drop the lineage ball with the S2000? Looks like the successor to the S200 to me.
:wink: This is the Toyobaru (FT-86) with FR layout, and it's targeting drift fans at price 25K range.
Well said ----here here! I guess I need to drive an Audi R8. Lineage - legacy - man are you ever hitting the nail on the head here!
They had their heads up their ass :biggrin: I think Ferrai is buliding that car now the 458
they never gave a reason on the hsc?
I want one of these
Is that a new pic/rendering or is it old? Looks like an updated hsc.