Thinking out loud: I wonder if Shad's hood and duct design is much more efficient than the NSX-R? It obviously gets rid of the hvac inlet, likely optimizes radiator positioning, and seems like adjoining flows would be fairly seamless.
Thinking out loud: I wonder if Shad's hood and duct design is much more efficient than the NSX-R? It obviously gets rid of the hvac inlet, likely optimizes radiator positioning, and seems like adjoining flows would be fairly seamless.
That's the downside to venting heat just upstream of the HVAC outside air inlet. A similar reason the Mclaren F1 uses those door side vents to exhaust the radiator air flow. Since the engine air intake is centrally located on the roof. Just buck it up, it's a small price to pay for the increased performance. It looks cool too.
Nope, just increasing flow rate through one path of a heat exchanger (radiator) does not = increased efficiency. I don't know where you keep getting this idea.
What I don't understand is why it still blows hot air when I set it to reciculate the air instead of drawing it from outside.
That's curious. Wondering if others with hood vent experience this too?
That's curious. Wondering if others with hood vent experience this too? Perhaps , like I have a at present, there's a fault in your heater control valve?
I wouldn't rule it out, no idea how I would go about checking something like that though. I'll have to look in to it some more.
My CC was recently rebuilt by briank so that shouldn't be the problem.
Take the front cowl cover off under the windshield and check your recirc damper is closing correctly. IIRC, you should be able to see the damper.
Dave
It's self evident, that's why there are radiator fans, its why we experience "chill factor'' when air flows over our face and its why hot wire anemometers work. There may be an upper limit to air flow helping efficiency but it's definitely a key factor.
According to stuntman even at > 100mph the air exits NSX radiator at only around 15-20mph , if the enclosed shroud & duct & hood vent can increase this exit velocity (i.e increase mass flow) then I would be very surprised if thermal efficiency did not improve.
Oh yeah I definitely had no intentions of getting rid of it.
What I don't understand is why it still blows hot air when I set it to reciculate the air instead of drawing it from outside.
I know, I know, the HSV is front-engined, so of course any ducts would be located there. But, the HSV shows the latest advancements in ducting, compared to the old JGTC pictures where they also obviously directed the exhaust to the sides of the windshield rather than right over it:
Get a hot wire type anemometor, most have a hold max setting, some duct tape and some time. This reads velocity and you can measure the cross section area. Depending on how close you are to the fan, you have to account for a non-uniform cross sectional flow profile.
With velocity and area you can calculate cfm, but make sure you average a few readings across the diameter.
The most efficient set up you can do is making sure you are using the full face of the radiator with no stalled regions across the face of the radiator. A flow disruption upstream will be somewhat evened out naturally from the fin and tubes (nsx-r bar). The reason you want the front shroud mated up to the radiator is to get rid of right angle flow at the face; it will double the pressure rise for this transition.
Post radiator at the shroud, is crucial not to have the walls converge at too sharp of angles. A sharp transition will basically stop flow around the periphery of the heat transfer area.
Don't worry I struggled with waves and optics, but I kinda dug thermal and fluids.
... please explain in detail how the radiators thermal efficiency was improved by raising mass flow across the fins? (hint, this is a trick question)
Ty B said:In fact, there is a design velocity optimum for a given fin count and tube geometry. Where increasing flow velocity actually results in less heat transfer.