Dry carbon is more desirable ONLY if it is done right.
Isn't this the case with anything? Anything is more desirable ONLY if it is done right.
For DF, wet carbon is desirable because the method is affordable, and if alteration is needed, the cost of casting a new mold is more timely and cost effective. But DF is capable of doing both.
BTW, I have never seen any one do 10 layers during wet carbon production, so needless to, wet carbon hood replica can easily beat the weight of JDM OEM hood.
If you have read the previous post carefully, you know Honda produced the dry method Type R hood by using total of ten layers of CF. The advertised weight of the hood was over 6 kg. DF hood wet carbon hood is lighter than that.
So the question now becomes how did DF achieve a lighter hood than the OEM Honda one? Given the fact a wet lay up part is more resin rich which means it has a higher areal density: is it because DF employs less plys in their lay up schedule?
This also raised the question of when GT-ROM/ROUTE-KS advertised their hood at 2 kg (1/3 the weight of real Honda hood); the only logical explanation is that they mostly likely used only 2-3 layers.
The discussion was based on the "reason" behind the selection of dry or wet method. When you do dry carbon with insufficient layers of CF on some thing that large, the CF strength may be compromised. Dry CF is a very expensive process, therefore, in my opinion, doesn't make sense unless you produce the hood the way Honda did with the proper layers of 10. If any one got the hood right, it will be Honda’s own. And yes, I have seen it, and it is truly a work of art…
It is a cool way to advertise a CF part when using the word “Dry.” I ask Peter to produce the hood in dry carbon as a regular production item, and Peter doesn’t think the hood will sale because he will do the hood right by using 10 layers of CF, and have to rent the facility to produce it - The price will be high. Peter also understand that we already have venders selling dry CF hood, there is no reason to complete with them.
DF is capable of doing any methods you like, however, to make things simple; the price listed is all base on the basic wet carbon construction. You need to contact Peter directly if you want a different construction method, and work out the pricing.
Therefore, any one who is curious about Dry CF related product, it is important to find out how many layers of CF is in there.
Your comments regarding the construction technique DF selects to use are perfectly valid and understandable.
The same concept of strength applies to a wet lay up part also: the less plies used for a part may mean it's structure is compromised.
How many plies called for in the DF hood layup schedule?
In addition, the resin ratio also affects the parts strength: there is an optimum ratio given the operating parameters of a part, fiber being used and the resin being used. Once you go beyond a point, the part becomes weaker. Also, the compaction of the part is important in the structure's strength. So in designing and constructing a composite part there are a lot of factors to be considered.
To me, DF makes some very nice looking products. Their process is probably sufficient enough for the application of a hood or spoiler.
Personally, knowing how the part is made ultimately demonstrates how nice the product is. Thanks for answering the questions from members of the forum.
Hey george, want to finance a full Dry carbon wide body kit with center exiting exhaust for your GeoMetro?:biggrin:
Actually, I'm waiting for the perfect center exit exhaust for my NSX which is just as fast as a Geo Metro the way I drive it.
--
George