Cars driven and comparisons...

Bill92nsx,
interesting comments on the cars, i agree with you on most of them, but id like to add a few of my own:
1. lotus, the gearbox, so far mine feels fine, but the shift throws seem to long. wish there was a short shift kit. also, the seats need better side bolsters. too early to rate reliability.
2.ferrari testarossa: i'd recommend a 512tr. the earlier ones are way too underpowered and the brakes are terrible. raced one in my countach and wasnt even close!
3.ferrari 308qv and 328gts:awesome cars. not the fastest, not the best handling, but the overall package comes together like no other. to this day, one of my favorites.ive had both, and reliability was an a+.

4.lamborghini countach:my dream car since i was 12. mine was a 87 model so build quality was much better than on earlier versions.there was still a kit car quality to it, especially with things like caulking around the wheel arches. i guess that can be expected for a car designed in the early 1970's though. heavy clutch,and gearchange, difficult to drive in traffic. get it out on the open road though, and the experience of driving it comes alive. incredible performance and the sound...incredible. also in my experience, a very strong car with a+ reliability.cant wait to get another.
5.diablo: earlier models slightly more difficult to drive and the brakes are horrible, compared to later models. it is a big car, but the more you drive it the more is seems to shrink around you. awesome power,brakes and handling. reliability has also been a+.
6.acura nsx:for some reason, after buying the lotus, the biggest thing i notice about the acura is how very underpowered it is, and that the brakes leave alot to be desired.there are soo many other things the acura does that are just right though, such as seating position and gearchange. my best summation of the car...great daily driver.
 
Still laughing about the rental car thread, when I realized... I had darn near the ultimate "rental" car for about a month.

You see.. the Florida Lemon-Law Arbitration committee voted in my favor to have General Motors "buy-back" my 2000 Corvette. Although I've not had the priveledge to drive an assortment of Ferrari's, Porsche's, etc... I wonder how many of us have had the opportunity to treat our beloved possessions like Ferris Bueller on his day-off! Well... I had more fun than a teenager with any of Carol Shelby's creations... every day for a few weeks. I mean to tell ya... I left my signature at every stop light in town.

When I turned this thing over to the local Chevy dealer, smiling from ear to ear, I only feared the damn thing would fall apart as I slammed the door for the last time.

In retrospect, I now miss that Corvette...
I could park anywhere without fear of door-dings, potholes were to be aimed for, not avoided, cornering was to induce slides, not turn the best lap times and foremost... buttcheek prints graced the paint like a flock of seagulls used me for target practice.

Cars Driven... a few.
Cars treated like a red-headed step child... ONE.

Carl Camper
 
Well, I finally took the time: the following are brief write-ups on the various cars I’ve driven. They are completely and totally my subjective opinion and, though I don’t mean them to be, may very well be controversial. I in no way, shape, or form assert to be a ‘professional’ or even a ‘great driver’. If you’re really curious, try to drive these cars yourself (if you haven’t already) – your mileage will undoubtedly vary, and your opinion is certainly as good as mine… probably better
smile.gif


-Z18

0. Ferrari 360 Challenge

I ranked this car zero because, well, it’s not street legal. I drove one quite a few laps at Willow Springs and wow, what can I say. It’s a lighter (and therefore faster) 360 with much tighter suspension, fantastic grip (Pirelli P-zero Slicks will do that for you) and amazingly fast F1 shifters. Not only that, a factory roll cage, race seats, racing harness, etc. is stock. If I ever buy a track-only car, this is definitely on my list, especially since they’re down to about $140k used (well over $200 when I was looking). When you drive a street Ferrari you can tell they’re bred for the track as well – how much more that is true in a real Ferrari race car.

1. Ferrari F40 (euro-spec)

I rented this car in Germany and drove it on the Autobahn and on the Nurburgring. I’d read and even heard from people that this car is very hard to drive, that the power is uncontrollable, the interior plain, and the ergonomics uncomfortable. I say that’s crap. The power was very controllable, the interior very much like the 360 Challenge above (Spartan, and race car-like – I LOVE IT), and the ergonomics not really that bad. No, it’s not a daily driver, but yes, it is the road car closest to a true race car that I’ve ever driven. And oh, the horsepower. For those that don’t know, the European F40 is the true F40 – the American spec car was neutered to meet emissions… in fact, it lost so much HP they had to re-gear it just to get like a 4 second 0-60. The European model, on the other hand, has got to be somewhere around 3.5 – 3.7 sec. The handling is very stiff and the car is a natural on the track. Also worth noting is how well it accelerates when you’re already at speed (something, as of late, that is becoming more and more important to me). As I mentioned in an earlier post, I was able to gain on a GSXR-750 sportbike from about 80mph to around 150mph. Unbelievable. Additionally, the F40 is my favorite car of all time in terms of appearance. And while I’d still rather have an F50 (or even the F60/Enzo) because of its naturally aspirated V12, this car is still a dream car for me. If only the American-spec car wasn’t so much slower… buying one here would be more for looks and less for performance, I’m afraid
frown.gif


2. Ferrari 360F1 Modena

I own a 1999 360 and it is truly an amazing car. The build quality is much higher than older Ferraris, its cabin is more roomy than any other sports car I’ve even driven, and the performance and overall feel (the way the car communicates to you, the driver) is astounding. It is much more drivable day-to-day than, say, the F40, but it’s still a Ferrari – it’s loud, and people stare and surround the car where you park it… so it’s still probably not a daily driver for most, although it could be. The power is excellent, and even though it redlines at 8500, there’s still plenty of mid-range torque – enough to have fun with, but not so much that it makes it difficult to drive (say, like a Viper). The F1 transmission is a dream – while some ‘purists’ still prefer shifting conventionally, I’ll take the F1 transmission any day of the week, even though it still shifts rather roughly if you’re not under full acceleration (which should be rare… say, only when there’s a bimbo box or a cop in front of you).

The car is both amazing on the street and on the track. My only complaint would be that it comes stock with tires too skinny for it (215 front, 275 rear) and with Michelin Pilot Sports (a tire I really don’t care for). Once I put tires on it more close in size to what the Challenge car comes with (225 front, 295 rear) and Pirelli P-zero asymetricos, it turned into a dream. I’ve no idea what the skidpad is, but my Zanardi NSX is .99g and the 360 is superior (now that proper tires both in terms of compound and width have been equipped), so I’m guessing 1.01gs or so. I also have Tubi exhaust and air filters, allegedly giving me 5-15 more hp (depending on who you want to believe). In terms of straight line performance, I have drag raced a Viper GTS and we were neck and neck. I have come to a conclusion, however, after driving so many cars… I think I prefer specialists to generalists. To that end, I want my Ferraris to be extreme: loud, fast, race-car like, and exotically attractive. The 360 is a little too much of a compromise for me, and I’d prefer a Euro F40, an F50, or Enzo had I the funds… if you’re going to go Ferrari, I say go all the way.

3. Acura NSX Zanardi

Speaking of generalists, I indict the NSX… but more on that later. The Zanardi is an amazing car, ranked for me above, for example, the Porsche 996 Turbo even. The car is really just an Americanized Type S, and is therefore lighter, lacks power steering, and has tighter suspension, amongst other details. Basically, you get by default what most enthusiasts do to their NSXes right off the bat anyway, plus the exclusivity and gorgeous grey BBS rims. The strengths of the NSX for me? Beautiful (I don’t agree with the assertion that the looks are dated), unparalleled build-quality (it feels even better built than my wife’s Lexus), fantastic handling and feel (second only to the Ferrari’s above), and an engine that can survive day to day driving and thousands of thousands of miles (I drove a ’91 NSX with 90,000+ miles on it and it was still very tight.. the engine still bright). The cons? Well, we all know them: the car needs wider tires (partially addressed with the latest model update) and more power. (I’d also say stiffer suspension, but we’re still talking about the Zanardi). All in all, some people have called the NSX the Japanese Ferrari, and I agree. They are indeed very similar… similar looks, similar handling, similar philosophy behind the power band (both high revving, etc).

4. Porsche 996TT

My favorite daily driver to date, but that’s also my problem with the car. Having driven it extensively on the street and on the track, in my opinion it’s MUCH happier on the street. To me, the 996TT is more of a GT car than a sports car. You sit higher, there’s a little too much body roll, you are insulated from a lot of road feedback, etc. On the track it’s easy to drive pretty fast, but then when you really want to push it, and you turn of the incredible Porsche Stability Management System, well, it becomes a bit of a beast (though it is certainly possible I just need more practice with a rear engine car, and that they are more different than mid-engine cars than I suspect). I also don’t like the powerband for the track – all the power is in the middle, and it just tapers out at the high end… plus, it’s a turbo, and even though some reviews have said the lag’s not there, it IS. The throttle performance and response is nowhere’s close to the throttle-by-wire 360’s.

All that said, it’s probably my favorite daily driver. Non-enthusiasts really don’t know if it’s a boxster or what, so there’s rarely a crowd around the car in the parking lot. That extra room and comfy ergonomics? Great for the street. The Porsche, unlike the Ferrari, also has lots of nifty gadgets available, including a sweet sound system and a navigation system. Power? Having mid-range power on the street is perfect, and the car goes from very manageable when the turbos aren’t on to one of the fastest cars around when you punch it. And that power is not only available 0-60, but the thing also takes off like a bat out of hell when you downshift into fourth at 80mph. Also, the AWD is fantastic… not only do you feel more safe when it’s rainy or wet, it helps when accelerating from a stop (you just lurch forward like a tank – no stressing about wheel spin or being pushed this way or that). And it also helps when you hit any kind of bumps, sand, whatever… it’s definitely the safest car when you’re the type that has to drive fast as much as possible (not that that describes me, of course).

5. Ferrari 550 Maranello

I drove the 550 briefly at Willow Springs, the irony being that this is a GT car, not a track or sports car, but I’ve never driven it on the road. I can say this, though: it would be an awesome road car. Though the power is technically comparable to the 360, it’s really quite different. The car has much more torque and a very different power band. The car is also very heavy, with more body roll than even the 966tt. I’d say that if one really wanted to daily drive a Ferrari, this would be the model you’d want. That said, for the money and in that I want my daily driver to be less conspicuous, I rank the 996tt above this. I would have noted also that the Porsche is faster, but then I think this has been addressed by the car’s replacement, the 575M.

6. Porsche 996 C4S

It’s really easy to describe this car: it’s a 996tt without the turbo. I drove a friend’s recently, and it really is just that. The differences are very minor… the suspension seemed perhaps a little stiffer, but I may have been imagining it. The power was great, but also like the Turbo – all in the middle, with it tapering out at the end: definitely more a street car than a track car, IMHO. Bottom line: if you want what a high-end Porsche has to offer but can’t quite afford the Turbo, get the C4S.

7. Corvette Z06 (375hp)

Ok, I’m going to say this right up front: I’m a red-blooded patriotic American, but I don’t like American cars. I typically don’t like their looks quite as much, and I definitely don’t like the build quality (or lack thereof). That said, the Z06 is an amazing car – just look at the data. Quite simply, it’s the best bang for the buck (especially now that it’s 405hp). Not only have I driven one for a bit, I’ve driven with quite a few on the track, and they are incredible. Not only are they fast, but you get like 1.0-1.01g right off the lot. But, though the quality seemed decent, it still didn’t feel that great, and my friend’s had problems pretty much right away. That, and the front end is long, and I just didn’t get very good road feel out of the car – it seemed purposely hidden from me, much like the Porsche Turbo. The car just feels large and more like a GT car, despite the performance numbers that clearly indicate it is indeed a sports car, and a formidable one at that. If I was going to buy an American exotic, however, I think I’d get a Viper GTS ACR… say, yellow with black stripes.

8. Dodge Viper GTS

Wow, the Viper. It was hard to not rate it above the Z06 (and maybe, had I ever driven an ACR, I would). I’ve simply never driven a car that felt like it had as much torque… it just doesn’t matter what gear you’re in, the power is there. If one was a big street racer, this would be the car to have – it just goes, any time, any where. Someone pulls up on you and you’re not ready? Don’t worry – you’re ALWAYS in the powerband. It also looks great… very aggressive and beautiful, IMHO. And, if you have the talent (and I mean, a LOT of talent) it can be VERY fast on the track. Yes, contrary to popular belief that the Viper is just some straight-line muscle car, it actually is a fantastically performing car on the track, both in a straight line AND in the corners.

The cons? Like I said, it’s very hard to drive. For one, there’s tons of engine braking – if you can’t heal-toe with the best of them, you’re going to have issues on the track. And the braking? Well, they FINALLY added ABS (the Vipers I’d driven didn’t have it)… and without ABS, it’s pretty scary. Also, you think the nose is long and in your way in a Corvette? It’s even longer in the Viper, really interfering with the ‘one-with-the-road’ Zen feeling I like to achieve. And build quality? Forget it. It’s not there, and they rattle and make noise in a scary way (or, at least, all three I’ve ever driven have).

9. Mazda RX-7 TT

The 1993 Mazda RX-7 that I used to own was a great car. Decently fast with excellent handling characteristics. And it had good build quality, although I hear that I was rather lucky, that many other of these cars have issues. The power band is good, somewhere in-between the Porsche and the Ferrari in philosophy. The turbo lag is pretty bad, though. I sold mine to a friend who then took it and made a barely street legal track car out of it, and it now can beat my 360 on the track (and he only put probably another $10k into it or so). That’s pretty incredible (and he’s a really good driver, and I don’t drive my Ferrari at 10/10ths).

If we had access to the newer, Japanese only RX-7s here (that have 280+ HP, as opposed to the 240 or so the American spec cars did, and have ‘type R’ equivalent model variations), I assume I’d have ranked this car even higher on the list. But I don’t. I will say that in the $10-$20k price range, it’s the sweetest used sports car you can buy, and one of the easiest to upgrade for the track.

continued next post...

[This message has been edited by Z18 (edited 13 August 2002).]
 
(continued from previous post...)

10. Honda S2000

Well, why do I have an S2000 if I’d rate it a 10 on my list? Because it’s a convertible, that’s why. It’s a small, darty roadster with a 9k redline made by Honda that outclasses Boxsters and M Roadsters. But, when compared to all of these other cars, it does have some issues. For example, it’s cramped inside, has NO torque, and the radio sucks. It’s a lot of fun to drive, especially on a hot California night with your lady next to you, but it’s definitely no street racer (unless you like to ‘cruise’ with the engine whining above 6k RPM – ouch!). On the track it’s fun, with amazing balance (50/50 weight distribution, I believe), but also rather hard to drive fast. The opposite of the Viper, the challenge of the S2000 is to KEEP it in its power band. If you do, it’s pretty darn fast… if you don’t, there go a bunch of cars right on by you. I will say, though, that I’ve been on the track, for example in my 996tt, and have had S2000s zip right by me. Why? Hoosiers or Khumos, better exit velocity coming out of the last corner, and probably better drivers than me too
smile.gif
I know, for example, that Doug Hyashi FLIES in his S2000.

11. BMW M3 (E46 SMG)

I just drove one of these recently that a friend finally picked up. WOW. If you’re in the market for a sports sedan, look no further. I used to think BMWs were pretty much snobby status symbols, but this car changed my mind. It’s beautiful inside and out, has a great motor, lots of power (0-60 in 4.7 seconds, plus some sweet torque), and the SMG (F1) transmission seems to be on par with my 360’s (although, granted, this was some quick street driving as opposed to many, many laps on the track in the Ferrari). All that said, however, it’s a Sedan, and don’t forget that. It’s comfy, it’s fast, it has some trick shifting, but it also has like a mid-high .80s skidpad and a BUNCH of body roll. Enough to scare you, in fact, because you think for a second you’re driving a sports car with all this power and great handling characteristics… that is, until you hit your first turn and the tires start screeching and you start drifting off the road…

12. Acura NSX-T '00

Ah, here’s where I risk being banned from the boards and crucified at the next NSX meet
smile.gif
Pretty much everything I say about the Zanardi above applies, except this thing has body roll almost as bad as the M3 above. And, you know, that’s fine Mr. Honda IF you also sell sportier versions in America as well. But you don’t, and that’s pretty upsetting. Sure, release the heavy, boaty targa for the suit who wants people to see him in an exotic, but also give us enthusiasts that new Type R, dammit. We want the handling as well – thank God, as is well known, it doesn’t take much to turn a stock NSX into a truly fabulous sports car, which is exactly what virtually everybody does.

13. Lamborghini Diablo VT

Boy, was this a let down… probably more of a let down than #14 below. Now, I’ve never been a huge Lambo fan… the Countach just wasn’t my dream car as a small boy (the 512BB was, and then later the F40). But I still thought they were amazing, and was even more excited when the Diablo came out. I finally rented one, though, about 2 years back and at risk of heresy, the car is, well, a bit of a poseur. Yeah, it’s beautiful, and yeah you get more looks driving it than any Ferrari I’ve ever driven, but boy it’s a boat. It’s certainly a GT car and not a sports car. The ergos and visibility is bad, and the handling feels atrocious. And it didn’t even seem that fast (granted, this wasn’t the 6.0 model). Yes, going 70mph in first gear is pretty cool for a while, and yes it does feel very stable at speed and I was convinced it would do 190+ down the freeway in a very stable way… were I insane enough to have tried it. But, well, it’s just not for me… if I wanted a heavy GT car I’d much rather have a 996tt (which I do) or a new Ferrari 575M. I’m still waiting for some decent track tests of the Mercialago, and hopefully it’s a much better car. (For another similar perspective, check out the CLASSIC Best Motoring January 2000 issue, where they race a Diablo, F40, F50, and other cars at Suzuka – the Lambo is pretty embarrassing there as well).

14. Ferrari 355 Spider

This car was also a let down. It’s beautiful, it’s a Ferrari, you get all the looks, and man what an incredible exhaust note (sweeter, IMHO, than my 360’s). But it’s slow. And this was the first Ferrari I ever drove, and I already had my Zanardi, so I was very disillusioned (in fact, I wondered for a while if Ferraris were overrated – thank God the 360, F40, etc. later changed my mind and renewed my faith in the marque). I just couldn’t (and can’t) imagine paying that much for a car I know my Zanardi would smoke. Its powerband reminds me very much of the S2000… there is NO low end or mid end, and no torque. It does go when you are screaming close to its 8500 redline, but it certainly lacks the 360’s midrange, and even a 3.2l NSX’s midrange. I used to say that if you really, really wanted a Ferrari but could only afford a relatively cheaper one, get a 355… but then Wayne Mello bought a 360 in the low-mid $100k range, there went that argument
smile.gif
I will say, though, that I still like the looks of the 355 over both the NSX and the 360.

15. Acura NSX '91

Not too much to say here… it was like the ’00 NSX, except older and the 3.0l engine lacks the midrange power to which I’d been accustomed. A friend of mine bought one for a really good price, I drove it, and this is where I’d rank it as long as it remained stock. ‘Nuff said.

16. Corvette C5

Well, take all the bad about the Z06, keep it, then remove all the good about the Z06, and you have a regular C5. Heavy, boaty, not that fast, big front end, poor road-to-driver communication, and weak build quality. Again, ‘Nuff said.

17. Ferrari Testarossa

My criticisms of this car, IMHO, are a bit unfair, because this car is pretty old (I think it was a ’90 (pre-512TR), but I’m not sure). I drove it briefly and it’s simply dated. It’s about as fast as an older NSX or an RX-7tt… it’s pretty heavy and boaty… the ergos suck, and the build quality was kinda like what I was told some older Ferraris were cursed with. That said, it’s gorgeous and you get a lot of looks and it’s still a Ferrari. I guess if were collecting cars to collect, not to drive, this car would be up there. But I’m not.

18. Acura Integra Type R

These last two cars are, like the M3, not really sports cars. The M3 is a sports sedan, and the Integra/RSX is a sports coupe. So it’s really not that fair to even put them on the list, but I did. The Integra Type R is a fun car, though not very good for daily driving due to the fact that it’s not a 6 speed but they geared it for the track anyway. It therefore drives down the freeway in 5th with the RPMs so high it’s pretty annoying. That said, if you want a cheap car to go on the track with, I suppose it’s decent. I’d still go with a used RX-7tt any day, but then the Integra is newer and not a turbo. I’d love to drive a Japanese RSX Type R (still called an Integra there, I believe).

19. Acura RSX Type S

A friend just recently bought one of these and all I can say is wow. Despite it being at the bottom of my list, I can’t think of a more amazing new car in its price range. For like $23k you get a 200hp car with an 8k redline. Pretty sweet. And it’s a 6-speed, and the ergos are better than the older Integra (e.g. an adult can actually semi-comfortably fit in the back seat without requiring neck therapy thereafter). That said, the suspension is not as stiff, it’s certainly not as track ready as the Integra Type R, and it’s uglier than its predecessor. Honda, release the RSX Type R here please. Thanks.

--------
 
i too was able to drive an f40 many years back at the cavalino classic in palm beach. the memory of that day will live on forever. the f40 will always be my favorite ferrari. not a fan of the f50.

z18, i dont think comparing a diablo, to a f40 or an f50 on a roadcourse is a fair comparison. the diablo is pretty much a streetcar while the others are more like race cars. to see a diablo gt out there with them would be nice though.

car and driver magazine raced a f40 against a diablo back in 1991. in a straight line they were close..12.20@122 in the quarter for the f40 and 12.40@119 for the diablo. on the roadcourse though, the f40 was substantially faster. the early diablo and early diablo vt(especially) are far too heavy,and are severly lacking in the brake department.

road and track also raced a euro f40 against a euro diablo in a top speed battle, the f40 lost 197 to 202. acceleration was better for the f40.
 
z18, almost forgot. the ferrari 360 modena.
ive driven and raced a few of these in my diablo. the one i drove just seemed soo tame. it seems like an over grown nsx. it doesnt even feel fast, and the ones ive raced confirm the seat of the pants feeling, the diablo leaves them for dead. the styling is way to conservative also. a supercar needs to be raw. something ferrari seems to be missing nowadays. one thing for certain on the 360 though... love the sound.
 
Z18,
Wow! Your review of the cars you drove was the most entertaining piece that I've ever read! I rank yours above all of the magazine writer's car reviews! This oughtta be your day job, IMO!
smile.gif

Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us. I had so much fun reading them.
smile.gif

Cheers!

[This message has been edited by Zanardi 50 (edited 13 August 2002).]
 
Z-18, or should I say B.M.?

Why the ruse? No bother. However some very impressive credentials, and a great write up. Kind of brings the rest of us unfortunate few a little closer to what these magnificent beasts are really like.

Thanks again,

P.S. What about some track time?
 
Really!? That would be sweet!!! Maybe one of the NSX club meets, around the parking lot or something.
wink.gif
You can try driving mine, but that might not be that intersting to you... :P

-Kenji

Originally posted by Number9:
Sheesh Kenji, if you wanted to drive a hot-rodded Zanardi, you just needed to ask! I'm still working on the GT2 thing...

[This message has been edited by Number9 (edited 12 August 2002).]
 
z18,

that is really nice review. Keep us updated when you get to drive more cars. My chance on driving/beating on nice cars has reduced dramatically.

I was lucky, when I went to college, almost all my friends are rich foreigners driving nice cars. That's how I get to test drive their nice cars. Although most of them, more into Sedan, than sports cars.

------------------
Register for NSX driving School at Thunderhill (9/3/2002) by clicking here
 
Um lets see... Cars:
91 NSX
74 Gremlin (304, Levi package)
73 Vega (cosworth, that's what the guy said it was)
71 Pinto (with one of thoses tornado air cleaner things)

(the gremlin was hot)

Tracks:
Bill-Bobs micro-racetrack (dirt pit behind bill-bob's house)
Rt. 27 at 2AM drags at the county line



[This message has been edited by hgunnerz (edited 13 August 2002).]
 
Back
Top