Interesting theory: to justify the EVO-Brembo brakes performance due to motor failures...AU_NSX said:Yes I meant AP Racing not APC actually...
I have had 5 Mitsubishi's over the years and every one of them was a POS. I have no confidence in ANY of their products anymore. They seem to design to a limit state and the number of problems and blown motors on the EVO's would seem that they are no different. So, going on past experiences, I would not expect their brake specs to be anything other than the absolute minimum design.
From what Ive heard, the MIVEC 4G63 is a very advanced engine with a lot of potential to make big HP numbers on stock internals.
Ive owned a 3000GT VR4 which was an overweight touring car with very poor brakes. Yes mitsubishi has made cars in the past with under powered brakes but that shouldnt be the reason to write off the abilities of the EVO's brembo system let alone relating motor failures to the performance of the brakes.
The car has a lot of rally history in it and was designed to better their performance in the WRC championship. The better the platform of your production car = better abilities/rules allowed for your race car (as history has always shown). The brembo brakes are a good system and you do haveto change out the pads to a more aggresive one, once you do that it is more than fit for track abuse. I've also driven many stock EVOs with stock pads and do notice some fade but they are relatively good compared to most street cars.
Yes the Comptech system is great and better than the EVO Brembo caliper, and is great for your application. But that shouldnt be the reason for you to put down an EVO's Brembo system and call it crap.