December 20 (other thread):
it will be a marketing win for Acura is someone ponies up over $300,000 for it.
January 30:
But the same guy paid $1.05 million for the first 2014 Corvette! The Corvette is a far cheaper and far higher production volume car. Thus getting only 14% more for the first NSX is not that impressive.
Anything over $300,000 is a “win,” but $1,2 million “is not that impressive." Whatever.
Yes, I know your response: But the less expensive C7 Corvette fetched $1 million, so $1.2 million for the first NSX ain’t impressive in comparison. Yet, that’s not what you said beforehand. Beforehand, $300,000 was the benchmark.
Moreover, there are a considerable number of Corvette collectors who will pay top dollar for collectable vettes, and the original MSRP is entirely irrelevant. There are many, many fewer NSX collectors.
Furthermore:
For example the first Ferrari 458 Speciale sold for $900,000.
The first NSX fetched $300,000 more than the exalted, more expensive Ferrari 458 Speciale. In my humble opinion, that’s impressive. So why focus on the C7 price and downplay the NSX price – why not instead focus on the 458 price and praise the NSX outcome?
I don't see how it's a good thing for the rare NSX to be viewed as being the equal of a new mass produced $55,000 Corvette with respect to collectors. It makes the NSX appear to be hugely overpriced relative to its desirability.
You’re kidding, right? Was the Ferrari 458 Speciale viewed as “the equal” of, or less than, the mass produced C7 simply because the first one fetched $100,000 less at auction? Of course not.
IMHO, anyone that is not absolutely thrilled with the results of this auction has an agenda/ulterior motive. $1.2 f*ing million. That’s a fantastic outcome.