Acura RL caliper retrofit

dave,

The pic I CAN see does not show:

1) the caliper BOLTED to the knuckle using the adapter
2)that it is without a doubt a legend knuckle and not....a...prelude/civic???

its scam. he is on every honda site there is. I could make this work also but try finding these calipers(not new)

BEN

PS-havent dynoed yet, but waiting for a final chip.
 
Hi, sorry for the lengthy response.

No this is not a scam, and lately I have gotten onto a few more honda sites since there are a lot of people who told me to start posting this kit and everything.

I do not have a picture from the backside yet, but I will take one tomorrow.

I'll post the picture of the prototype of the bracket which has since been cleaned up and I'm now using grade 8 bolts insted of grade 5.
rlbrackette0.jpg


This is all I have right now, its of the 11.8" setup but the bracket is the same.
rlrearbracketpicje5.jpg


Ugly picture I know. The grade 5 bolts (now grade 8) go through the caliper directly into the bracket and use those big ass lock washers. The bracket bolts on the backside of the tabs opposed to the frontside of the tabs via some 99 Acura RL caliper bracket bolts (torqued still to 80 lb-ft.) The bolt heads were grinded to the flat part (there is a ring shaped ridge.) I'd rather use these bolts insted of aftermarket bolts because flange bolts do offer that wider head and the factory Honda bolts are all but bulletproof.
The problem with the NSX is that the rotor is SO short that putting an RL rotor on its hub may not even fit. The backside of the rotor would hit the stock mounting tabs of the knuckle (even if you remove the dust shield altogether.) I'm researching to find a 12.6" rotor with a short hat that I can redrill and use a hub-ring to fit to the NSX knuckle.

I'm working on the S2000 setup also, but again, its the issue of height since the RL rotor's hat is much taller than that of the S2000. I can make hub rings, so I'm going to start looking outside Honda/Acura for a 12.6" rotor with a shorter height so that this can be bolted to the NSX and S2000 and certain other Honda/Acura cars with stock rotors that are 'short.'

Regarding the wilwood kit, I would perfer this because wilwood tends to use thin rotors netting less heat capacity, and a lot of there brakes in the past do not use dust boots. We are all pretty much guaranteed the RL calipers are going to be reliable, though I'm sure wilwood would as well, but I don't know from experience, the only wilwood brakes I've run were on the old Formula car at my school, and those did take a bit of maintainence from the lack of dustboots.

Sorry if I missed any questions, I'm going to try and reply to all of my PMs, if I forget or missed one, PM me again, I didn't get email updates about this thread until now.
 
Are you looking for the BBK look, or find the S2000 brakes not adequate?

Curiosity only. As stated earlier, if I wanted a BBK I would buy a standard BBK with established support behind it (Brembo, AP Racing, Wilwood).

The S2000 brakes are perfectly capable as they sit, especially with upgraded pads and SS lines (which I haven't done) and better fluid (which I have done). I'm not about to drop $1200-$3500 for the "looks" (and very possibly the loss in performance) of a typical BBK.

BBK looks great but I find that too many of them are adapted to fit a vehicle instead of engineered for the specific vehicle. You tend to lose brake balance/bias, feel, and sometimes even braking capability. You might get better heat dissipation but for the few times I'll take my car to a full-out track day, I'll stick with my "tiny" stock rotors and just upgrade as listed above.

I'd probably go with a Brembo setup if I did it, maybe AP Racing. Both are well known and respected in racing circles.
 
Curiosity only. As stated earlier, if I wanted a BBK I would buy a standard BBK with established support behind it (Brembo, AP Racing, Wilwood).

The S2000 brakes are perfectly capable as they sit, especially with upgraded pads and SS lines (which I haven't done) and better fluid (which I have done). I'm not about to drop $1200-$3500 for the "looks" (and very possibly the loss in performance) of a typical BBK.

BBK looks great but I find that too many of them are adapted to fit a vehicle instead of engineered for the specific vehicle. You tend to lose brake balance/bias, feel, and sometimes even braking capability. You might get better heat dissipation but for the few times I'll take my car to a full-out track day, I'll stick with my "tiny" stock rotors and just upgrade as listed above.

I'd probably go with a Brembo setup if I did it, maybe AP Racing. Both are well known and respected in racing circles.
+1

Just curious because S2Ks have pretty good brakes from the factory, and held up to the track abuse that i've put them through. I was pretty impressed with the stock brakes on that car...
 
+1

Just curious because S2Ks have pretty good brakes from the factory, and held up to the track abuse that i've put them through. I was pretty impressed with the stock brakes on that car...

The S2000 has far more capability than I have driving ability right now. I'm more interested in improving me than the car at this juncture in time.

Serious racers (ie, amateurs in the SCCA and NASA race scene) have found the rotors tend to crack under constant racing conditions but otherwise, they hold up fine until you go to R-compound tires. After that, cryo-treated rotors or a BBK help keep repairs and failures to a minimum.
 
Contributing sounds much different than what you have tried to do. Maybe it's in your blood that you have this kind of attitude. I think you just need to shut the hell up all together, because w/o you NSXprime didn't seem to benefit any more than it has been. Don't try to be a "gentleman" BS because deep inside you just want to show that you know $hits and that you take a thrill out of putting people down. You sure on my S-list! Not that you care but what the heck. BTW, your cockiness might bite you on your behind on the track one of these days... and I shall wait and see!

I think we've officially reached a low point here.
 
Here is what I did with the TL calipers I had floating around. Nice BBK look. Don't know if you get anything but bling, but it should not hurt braking.:wink:

I used Brembo studs, cro-moly spacers and grade 8 coupling nuts to put the adapter together. These are a direct bolt up with off the shelf Brembo floating rotors, same parts Comptech used for their Pro kit. I don't think there is clearance to use a smaller diameter rotor if you look at the offset needed to mount the studs in the brackets.

Kind A' Cool! Hard to imagine there is a market, rotors/hats/fasteners alone are over $1000, even if you get the calipers for free...not much of a deal.
 

Attachments

  • TL caliper and bracket, rotor.JPG
    TL caliper and bracket, rotor.JPG
    74 KB · Views: 383
  • TL caliper bracket rotor inside.JPG
    TL caliper bracket rotor inside.JPG
    73.6 KB · Views: 330
  • TL bracket, end shot.JPG
    TL bracket, end shot.JPG
    69.6 KB · Views: 282
  • DSCN6409.JPG
    DSCN6409.JPG
    67.7 KB · Views: 269
Here is what I did with the TL calipers I had floating around. Nice BBK look. Don't know if you get anything but bling, but it should not hurt braking.:wink:

That does look pretty cool, is there any way to create a 4-wheel kit while retaining e-brake functionality?

I suppose you would need to install a 'brembo'-style caliper e-brake?
 
That does look pretty cool, is there any way to create a 4-wheel kit while retaining e-brake functionality?

I suppose you would need to install a 'brembo'-style caliper e-brake?

Yes, add an E-brake like all the other kits. Can't recommend these front and rear with out some way to balance the line pressures. Would be pretty bad for brake balance.
 
BrakeExpert. Im sure you know your specs and numbers. I can not tell you how big a brembo rotor is but give me 5 minutes, i'll google it. Does it make me an brembo expert? In your post, i see a lot info about specs and sizes but that is absent is the behind the scene hydrolic theroy , brake balance, car balance and setup. Im confident in your bracket making abilities but unlike the civic crowd... we here think more in depth about the issues and thus STUNTMAN's posts. A man can change tires all his life but not know a thing about tire compound, tread design, construction, etc. The NSX is has always and will always be about balance of style, power, handling all working as one. Being a BRAKEEXPECT should be about the COMPLETE braking system and not just the rotor or caliper or brakets.

Im pointing out a couple of things that has not been discussed up to now which should be more important than the size and look of a caliper/rotor.

with bigger calipers, I would think that there needs to be more fluid displacement to fill all the pistons. since RL calipers are designed for RL brake masters cylinders (RLMC)..... we would have to compare the master cylinder brake fluid displacement bore and stroke first to see if we can have the same effect on the RL caliper pistons with the NSX brake master. Is the RL MC two step design with duel bore? or single stage like the NSX? Obiviously we need to know this.

is the stock brake master up to the task?

im in Stunts boat. this guy has more track time then all the nsx member put together and im sure he has seen every kind of brake fade.

Not to take sides, but experience speaks.

Here is the problem I see daily with big brake kits and SUPER DUPER whatever retro fits.

The brake simply OVER POWERS the tires coefficient to the ground.

the best braking comes in NOT when the ABS is kicking in but when the tire is scrubbing the ground at about 15% slippage.

What I see on lots of customer cars is huge brakes. When you stop, the calipers in the front lock up and the abs kicks in and the rear breaks do not do much at all. The car gets all squrmy

Since the stock nsx comes with front and rear proportion valves and that value is set.... lets so 70% front and 30% rear ( I dont know the exact numbers) so when your in a STOCK nsx brake configuration, the calipers in the front and in the rear get a proper amount of force so that the front brake works and so does the rear. So the front applies 70 Units of force and the back applies 30 Units of force for a total of 100% force (under normal braking)and the car is balance is not upset drasticly since both the front and rear can sqat down when braking.

NOW change this formula. We got a HUGE caliper that has 2x the surface area in the front as before.... so now with out adjusting the proportion valve, we still have that 70/30 split.

Now the front brakes is Appling 70unitsX2 = 140Units of stopping power and the rear is applying 30 units.

Well... WOW what's wrong with that?!?!? we got OVER 170 UNITS of stopping power! that's AWESOME!...... wrong.:rolleyes:

Bigger is not better.:biggrin:

Ok lets take in consideration that the front tires LOCK UP at 69 units of braking force.

When we put the brakes on, the total force we applied to the front to reach that 69 units (69/140 = 49%) is 49% of the over all braking force capable to the front which = the original 70 units since the back 30 units stay the same.

So now look at the back brakes. Since the proprtional valve is consistant and only the front brake pad coeffecient changes, then 49% of 30 units over braking power can be applied to the rear brakes which is only 14.5 units of braking force in the back..... so in effect we lost 15.5 units of braking force in the back which is a loss of over 55% braking force in the rear!!.... if the tires in the back brake less and then the rear of the car is going to lift up more under hard braking and get the car out of shape.

INcreased braking distance and safer braking? i dont think so. BUT you can say.. LOOOK i got some AweSOmE Big MONSTER CALIPERS when your sitting at the side of the road/track after spinning out. Its all about balance. Bigger calipers on the front? you need more agressive pads on the back to even out the car, or change the ratio at which F vs R braking power is equalized. But when you eqalize the F to R braking power..... your effectively still going back to the 70/30 ratio EXCEPT, you have bigger rotor up front which dissapates more heat thus less brake fade.

The problem also lies in that with bigger brakes, your tires lock up consistantly, when the ABS kicks in, your braking distance INCREASES when compared to 10-15% slippage which can be maintained by a skilled driver such as Stunt ( Stunt you better be able to do this :tongue: ). ABS helps the everyday driver since ABS is better than lock up.

Anyways, I get lots of complaints from customers, who's big brake kits always lock up when they get on the brakes.

Personally I rather all 4 corners of my NSX is balance and working together, then just the Front 2 doing all the work which throws off the balance of the car. Im not Honda, Im not Zanardi, im not Best Motoring (BMI hammers on the nsx at the track, never talked about brake fade). If they all can thought the calipers where good enough for the track, ill stick with their opinions.

My illustration is kind of confusing.... anyways, doing best I can with what's in my mind.:smile:

For most every day users and limited track use. A good set of hawk + pads and regular brake fluid flush will be more than good enough.

BIGGER CALIPERS does not = better braking distance but does help with brake fade.. but which one of us drives their car to the point of brake fade???

personally, I drive my car in the canyons hard. I dont abuse it, i keep it in tip top shape and i drive it. 30-40 mile stretches and no issues. Never felt like I needed more braking power or bigger calipers.

I like the feeling of jamming on the brakes and not having ABS kick in every time.

The braking distance is limited by the tires ability to maintain contact with the ground not by the size of your calipers. and our stock calipers can absolutely over power the tires to the ground coefficient when you get in it. Anymore increase in that braking coefficient is a waste unless you have heavy track use and need the bigger rotors to limit brake fade.

Warmest of regards to everyone

Rob:smile:
 
Last edited:
with bigger calipers, I would think that there needs to be more fluid displacement to fill all the pistons. since RL calipers are designed for RL brake masters cylinders..... we would have to compare the master cylinder brake fluid displacement bore and stroke first to see if we can have the same effect on the RL caliper pistons with the NSX brake master.

is the stock brake master up to the task?

im in Stunts boat. this guy has more track time then all the nsx member put together and im sure he has seen every kind of brake fade.

The braking distance is limited by the tires ability to maintain contact with the ground not by the size of your calipers. and our stock calipers can absolutely over power the tires to the ground coefficient when you get in it. Anymore increase in that braking coefficient is a waste unless you have heavy track use and need the bigger rotors to limit brake fade.

Warmest of regards to everyone

Rob:smile:
This has bigger rotors, 328x28, same thing Stuntman is using on the set I built for the Factor X unlimited car.

"Nice BBK look. Don't know if you get anything but bling, but it should not hurt braking. "
 
This has bigger rotors, 328x28, same thing Stuntman is using on the set I built for the Factor X unlimited car.

"Nice BBK look. Don't know if you get anything but bling, but it should not hurt braking. "

Hi Dave

Im not talking so much about your setup. More about the RL since its a 4 piston big caliper setup. Big brakes/big displacement systems need a duel pistons config. The first stage is a bigger bore which applies LESS hydrolic preassure but displacese more fluid to bring the pads into contact with the rotors. The second stage is a smaller bore pistons which displaces LESS fluid but applies MORE hydrolic preassure to stop the car.

+ you know your stuff. Seen the work you done and its top notch!

Regards

Rob:smile:
 
Last edited:
Wow, I just came in here to do some brake research. I can personally vouch for BrakeExpert. He's helped me a lot in my 5-lug brake upgrade dispite most of his research going into Civic (4-lug) brake upgrades. I'm a skeptical guy as well but I've been guilty of making assumptions. When I've assumed something, this guy wants concrete proof. He's always making me verify my claims. I don't know how many brakes (DC2 ITR, RSX-S, TL/CL, S2000, Prelude) I have now but I've found his information to be always accurate.

Swift, he is not a scam artist. Yes, he's on a lot of sites. So what? So am I. All I know is that he can't get into his K20a.org account. I believe he's most active on Honda-Tech and there's a lot of people that have done business with him.

Stuntman, you MAY be right but geez, give the guy a break (no pun intended). No need for the condecending attitude. You could have brought up all the same points without being as much of an ass.

Anyway, just thought I'd stick up for the guy as I consider him a friend since I have been talking to him for maybe over half a year now. He's helping me despite not making any money off of me. I don't need his machining services since I'm not adapting to 4-lug and I'm not buying brakes from him as I can source my own. He does test his brake setups as he's always sharing his info with me. Maybe he's not testing on an NSX but he is testing out his brakes. And he switches them up a lot!
 
without reading anybody's comments, this guy is a "form" over "function" guy. as a result, caused many forum members from all over to get on his case.

in the end, it's just a pet project that perhaps might just end up on his civic? who knows....to the orig. poster, kudos for trying, but i would get rid of the brake expert name, that already messes things up...much like the "yer car is ugly because you don't have center caps" mentality.
 
I think some of us NSX guys need to look at the bigger picture, and get off the high chair.

I, and a few others, were ecstatic to see such possible innovation, and saddened to see it stiffled.

There is no argument that a 4K Brembo or equivalent brakes is of superior quality. For the regular track users, anything in between stock and such a kit is probably a waste of time and potentially detrimental. For the normal guy, it is just 4K+ bling b/c the stock system is more than adequate in 95%+ scenarios.

However, you guys (eg vendors, Brembo, titaniumdave..) are ignoring a huge market, the elephant in the room. The market where the owner wants newer brakes that are lighter, maybe a bit cooler, maybe a bit better and doesn't want to spend 4K to do so. Many of our cars are 75k,100K, 10,15 years old and new all around brakes may not be difficult to justify. A stock new system is going to cost you thousands of dollars anyway...

A RL retrofit that can take into account the mid-engine configuration and provide at least the braking potential as the stock system, may fit the bill.

I've said it and I'll say it again.. if someone (eg titaniumdave :) ) can put together a kit a 4-corner kit for... $2500 or so, have it be at least as effective as stock, and 3-5 lbs lighter each corner (from the first post, a the RL caliper + bigger rotor = 28 lbs vs stock 33 lbs for a 91), you have a product that will sell. Sure, if it's 4K, no reason to go with it but see what it takes to make it affordable while profitable.

If "brakeexpert" can make these kits on Civics and people buy them over the Brembo BBKs, then they have to be made reasonably affordable.

Quick parts/price check on the calipers from acuraoemparts.com for new comes out to.... about $1300sh. Used of an early mileage car will be much lower. I know there are more components, but serious, think it through..


43018-SJA-010 CALIPER SUB-ASSY., R. RR. 269.30
43019-SJA-010 CALIPER SUB-ASSY., L. RR. 269.30
45018-SJA-A01 CALIPER SUB-ASSY., R. 2008 RL 397.54
45019-SJA-A01 CALIPER SUB-ASSY., L. 2008 RL 397.54
 
Back
Top