I generalized about strokers being "stupid" for the track. Obviously those with deep pockets can make about anything work, at least for a few races. My point was that for 99% of folks who want a near bulletproof track car, common sense dictates to keep piston speed stock or slower and super or turbo. And of course Shad and other Realtime folks have given us the empirical evidence for this. I stick to my short mileage estimates for strokers and my coating comments. There is no free ride. Hondas safety factors are very small. I do not want to hurt Shad or SOS and i perhaps my comments should not be in an "Science of Speed" thread. Sorry about that Chris, we are VERY happy with your developement of this engine. Having built my own engines i would prefer to build my own NSX engine, especially since i believe these motors will need a refresh now and then. My desire in a thread like this is to find out the details so we can weigh all the factors ourselves and build them ourselves. I don't think my comments will cause a loss of business for SOS. Few want to do this themselves. Again while a believe a strokers mileage will be reduced. It will not be reduced to the point to scare me away. We should probably take "generalized stroker build data" to a non SOS thread out of respect for SOS's work. Probably to the build section(?) How about slicing up the build section into "track cars", "steet cars", supercharged engines, turbocharged engines, strokers, and stock displacement NA. Ane then we can do threads on cranks, pistons, rods, heads, intake, etc. It's impossible to post comments that relate to so many areas. Any takers?