- Joined
- 27 May 2016
- Messages
- 831
that's dirty. it was listed at 139 a few hours ago.RSO, I feel some slight of hand by the dealer.
I clicked on your link and the price shown in $169,900 today.
that's dirty. it was listed at 139 a few hours ago.RSO, I feel some slight of hand by the dealer.
I clicked on your link and the price shown in $169,900 today.
we have hit the bottom (until dealers dig out a new bottom.............)
http://www.nsxprime.com/forum/showt...-Vin-19UNC1B00HY000675-200k-MSRP-buy-for-189k
$44,800 off of MSRP.
It's not listed under new cars on the dealer's web site, it's listed as a used car (but with only 10 miles).
$44,800 off of MSRP.
It's not listed under new cars on the dealer's web site, it's listed as a used car (but with only 10 miles).
Only time will tell. Rarity will keep the values high, but if it proves to be unreliable then it's going to tank imo.
Only time will tell. Rarity will keep the values high.
Ideally I'd pick one up for $XX,XXX in a couple years. Hopefully low-mileage because the original owner wasn't impressed with the underwhelming performance and opted to drive her GT3 more often. lol.
That is hard to say. But sad to say it is possible and going to be harsh reality. Now I have experienced it, it is great car, but absolutely can not be compared to even a used 458 or even a used LP550/560. More emotional, bigger name, more wow factor to general public. Anyone who paid closed to near MSRP is stupid or just too successful to care, me and my business partner are stupid in both of our purchase, but because we can and we did it vs people who don't have ability to do so like they don't care. Therefore, no big deal. We move on to greater things. At least we experienced it. Honda/Acura had big dreams and they are not expecting to profit from selling NSX to begin with, so they did just fine. I still respect the company no less other than they need help on marketing and research area. If I were in charge, I make sure it is at least set the new bench mark like GTR did in 2009. Had it came out in 2011 it would had been the benchmark. But 6 years too late.Would love to find a blue one for 40k off. Who knows by end of year they could be 40k off, but the true price will be when you sell it. What will it be worth 3 years from now?
Say MSRP 175k less 35k off. So you pay $140k for it. Is it worth 100k in 3 years? Or is it worth 85k to 90k?
That is hard to say. But sad to say it is possible and going to be harsh reality. Now I have experienced it, it is great car, but absolutely can not be compared to even a used 458 or even a used LP550/560. More emotional, bigger name, more wow factor to general public. Anyone who paid closed to near MSRP is stupid or just too successful to care, me and my business partner are stupid in both of our purchase, but because we can and we did it vs people who don't have ability to do so like they don't care. Therefore, no big deal. We move on to greater things. At least we experienced it. Honda/Acura had big dreams and they are not expecting to profit from selling NSX to begin with, so they did just fine. I still respect the company no less other than they need help on marketing and research area. If I were in charge, I make sure it is at least set the new bench mark like GTR did in 2009. Had it came out in 2011 it would had been the benchmark. But 6 years too late.
NSX is still the best "Japanese sports car" and better than anything on the market besides Ferrari/Lamborghini/McLaren at sub $120k range new or used. Those who genuinely interested in NSX should be glad that market correction has put it at price where it should had been to begin with.