I can't imagine the social unrest this would cause. What about moral hazard? How does this plan ensure it only rewards "prudent" people? I'm prudent, that's why I *don't* have $200k in debt. The blue-collar folks next door have more than $200k on an ARM, based on county records. The ARM wasn't "prudent" IMO, and if my estimation of their income is close, neither was buying the truck, SUV and RV parked on the street. Similarly, what about the strawberry picking couple making $18/hour combined who bought a $350k house with an option ARM? Will this plan take effect before or after their loan resets and they're forced into foreclosure. A lot of rate adjustments have yet to happen, meaning some "balls to the wall" imprudent people would be rewarded. If I woke up one day to find they got a bigger handout than me I would be pretty darn upset.
Who's going to pay for this $200k? Won't it cause inflation and devalue our currency? Won't it encourage reckless behavior? How will it keep people from levering up and recreating the same problems we have now as soon as their slate is wiped clean? What about all the debt that is owned by smaller banks that aren't in trouble and foreign entities...do they and their shareholders just get the shaft? Do we want to keep propping up property values? Houses are not affordable--that is the problem. So we keep some over-leveraged people from losing their homes; what about the next generation? Do we give them $200k so they can afford a home, or hope that wage inflation takes hold?