Originally posted by Dr.Lane:
JOel, I really never disagree with opinions here, but this is one I have too. If I had listened to the advice and recommendations of the counselors at my high shcool and college I'd probably be a bumb.
I don't believe that taking a test can provide anyone with an accurate gauge as to what profession they would be best suited for.
The gauge for accuracy and precision is pretty relative. The test wasn't certainly meant to be the BIBLE for the job market. However, between taking a shot in the dark by picking a major in college at random and taking a simple objective test, that would, if anything tells you where your
interests lie, I would opt for the latter. It's just goes with my methodical personality, I guess.
I knew I wanted to be an R.N. before setting foot in college. When I took the test, it gave me a more objective direction and that extra push to go ahead and pursue it. Certainly nothing wrong with that. It worked for me. It didn't work for you. That's why accuracy is relative. Surely a 20-minute test isn't a time-consuming task for anyone.
It all comes down to hard work and determination.
I agree. But without direction and strategic planning of where you want to go, hard work and determination is worthless. You can liken it to a fly in your office who's giving everything its got trying to fly out of an unopened window. He's working so hard at it and expending so much energy but he has no strategy to begin with. If it can only turn around and look for an open door, he would be more successful.
See, if not done correctly, it is a formula for ending up in an unrewarding career. Sure you can make the $$$ and get the prestigious status, but are people happy? Some are. Most aren't. How many people can say they are getting paid for what they LOVE doing? Maybe you can. And certainly the likes of Mario Andretti. But for your average joe? Doubt it.
[This message has been edited by Joel (edited 19 November 2002).]