Time is of the essence...
Carguy! said:
... I recently bought an Audemars Piquet
Which
AP did you acquire? Any recommendations for a prospective AP-buyer?
rickysals said:
fair enough, i can appreciate the investment aspect - but i still dont get how someone would pay twice as much as regular value for a 10year old watch.
if the market is there, take advantage of it i suppose
It's not the market. It's the way the world has evolved during man's time on Earth. The ability to recognize time was priceless throughout the milleniums. Only in the past century or so has time-keeping become so mainstream to the masses. Prior to, it was very much a very prized piece of workmanship to acquire.
In various books and papers I've read in regards to the Soviet/Russian offensive into Germany in 1944, often mentioned was the Red Army soldier's taking every possible wrist/pocket watch they could find. They would prioritize 'seeking time-pieces' above food/rations, German women, captured Wehrmacht officers, and other much needed wartime staples. And no, it wasn't to flip them on
www.eBay'ski.comm/ru-cccp! :biggrin:
Swiss/Geneve watches and time-pieces are one of the very few high-quality, hand-made, reliable, premium goods that an individual can acquire in a sense that they are getting a product relatively worthy of it's high cost. Nowadays, everything from sunglasses to leather-goods from even the most distinguished fashion design-houses are trite and not novel. They are mass-produced abroad w/o precision or exacting tolerances using marginal materials... definitely not worth anywhere near their lofty price at all whatsoever. The essence of owning such is merely recognizable and superficial affluence; a certain whiff of exclusitivity. But no sense of pride or satisfaction in terms of craftsmanship, skill, innovation, or legacy in owning. A possession lacking one elusive trait: timelessness...
Oddly enough, I've had the bests' experiences w/ Raymond Weil (a relative newcomer and moderately-priced Swiss watch-maker) compared to much higher priced Rolex, Cartier, Omega, and Tags that have been owned. Go figure?!? :frown:
Joel said:
The difference between a watch vs. 'time-piece' is the same as a cup of coffee and a Starbucks latte. It's basically the same in function, you're just voluntarily paying for the 'extras' like the name.
When you're talking about watches/time-pieces in the realm of mid 4-figures to 5-figures plus... it's more than time-keeping. It's use of expensive, precious metals and materials, innovative techniques, and incomparable craftsmanship... owning a NSX is what to you?
Swiss Army watch'esque C5 would make more sense, no? Who needs titanium connecting rods, magnesium-alloy engine components, aluminum frame & body components, hand-assembled, F1-champion inspired suspension, production-line dolly, post-assembly track tested, etc'... :wink:
Just look up the difference between chronograph & chronometer!