You see what I mean?
The problem is you Americans are too bullish on your own CoolAid!
The market was going down BEFORE the subprime collapse, just like it was going down BEFORE 911 - you guys like to have a "reason" a point in time singular event to "blame" it all on.
The beginning of the decline was the drop in the American Dollar (best illustrated by looking at a chart of the Eruo and/or the increase in domestic gas prices)
You can afford to service Ten or Eleven Trillion? Sure, but the way you service it is through high taxes and it provides the government with very little money to stimulate the economy with - all the while the Boomers are going to be taking more government provided prescription drugs and using more medicare.
Its like you saying you can weather the bad economy 'cuz you borrowed 95% of what your house (was) worth and have the cash in the bank so you can eat at restaurants, and go on vacations - then your triplets get into Harvard and you need to pay tuition - Now What?
IMO, the power and cash from the US economy has been carefully funneled to Iraq, Haliburtun, Oil Interests, and Bushies to the tune of 10 Trillion - what a waste.
I'd rather the President got BJs EVERY DAY instead of being this corrupt - and when I hear the "we can afford the debt and still thrive" stuff I just see someone who doesn't understand how the world views America right now.
Yes, I understand the point you've been trying to make. Yes, the media likes to have a specific data point to blame... but I don't. American's are bullish in general because we view ourselves as resilient problem solvers and we're eternal optimists. Remember how quickly the financial system bounced back after 9/11?... that doesn't happen if you don't have faith in your own future.
We don't need the government to stimulate the economy. It helps smooth things out, but it isn't necessary (or welcome) in free markets. Do we need stimulation to avoid recession... sure, but think about what Volkner did at the Fed during Regan/Carter... he pushed us into a recession to trim the fat and held our heads underwater... then we came out of it and grew the most dis-inflationary tool in history at an unbelievably rapid clip... technology.
Do we have a real problem with Boomers? Hell yeah, we don't have enough producers to compensate for their consumption as they retire... talk about inflationary. So freakin' what, we have such faith in our markets that we don't let the fear of the future become self-fulfilling.
You're analogy about weathering the storm by borrowing money against assets is somewhat correct. Remember that you mentioned globalization... the growth of emerging markets will continue to bolster world economies and the US will participate. Do you think all opportunities to make money have gone away for Americans? No, the person who borrowed money against their home is smart because now they have capital to put to work when opportunities arise. The analogy is wrong in one major way though, America can afford the debt... you're example's middle-class family can not. They are not creating capital with the burden while America is. It would be more accurate to say that the family leveraged their home to buy a stamp printing business and the spread is +2%... they can live like that indefinitely and everybody will be wealthier because of it. Sustainability of the house of cards is what is important, if we fall then we ALL fall.
It is surprising how few people really understand the mechanism of debt, especially on a global scale.
Bush has been wasteful for sure and I do not support liberal republicanism (I don't want this to be political, but I'm on the far right in economic issues if you haven't noticed). Obviously Presidents can have an enormous impact on the future of our economy (think FDR and what a triumph he was for socialism), so I'm very pleased that during this rough patch we have a lack of leadership in the white house. To me, it is ideal to have the gov't stuck in red tape and self-promotion while the elegant invisible hand is at work fixing their mistakes.
Something that is fundamentally important to remember is that the business cycle does not have an academic explanation. There is no reason that bubble's can't go on forever, but it appears to be human nature to sprint and then rest ad infinitum. That means that the "why" behind economic expansion and contraction is sentiment based. When times are good, who cares who owes whom what, it really doesn't matter. When times are bad, those debts get called in and dooms-dayers preach that this time we're really in for it. Then what happens?... oh gosh, we're suddenly booming again and new money comes in the refinance old debt. It just keeps going, fueling higher and higher standards of living while occasionally having a setback (2 steps forward, 1 back)... I presume you know that there is no limit to wealth in this world.
It might also be important to take note that we still have net employment growth. It is slowing and that is why the Fed will keep cutting, but it is net positive... that is not the stuff of recessions. Doomsday theory just does not add up on net balance.