Hopefully I'm not going to be upsetting anyone or considered hijacking the thread by these comments...
I think this is a classic debate on the values and costs of 'open society' and how to balance freedom and security/protection measures (ex: Homeland Security..).
Too much 'freedom' and you limit the government in finding out who is a risk to society and who is not. Too little freedom and you have a authoritarian government (no guns, no anti-government views, no private media, human rights violation etc..)
Although a full investigation will be needed, I think some of the big errors here are:
1.) Campus Police did not have guns (WTF?) Enough said... 2.) The writtings made by the killer in regards to violence were not taken seriously enough (http://newsbloggers.aol.com/2007/04/17/cho-seung-huis-plays/)
On #2 - I strongly believe that people that make violent threats and/or hold violent views should be taken very seriously, documented, and action taken to hold those accountable and/or mitigate the possibility that they will be carried out - even if it means that 'freedom of speech' is not granted. It should be in the same category as sexual harassement, and even more serious. Zero tolerance.
History has shown over and over again that the threats made by megalomaniacs often become reality.... and like Columbine... there were many warning signs, 'we' failed to give them enough wait.
Again - I hope I have not upset anyone by making these comments.. I am saddened as well by the tragedy...
I think this is a classic debate on the values and costs of 'open society' and how to balance freedom and security/protection measures (ex: Homeland Security..).
Too much 'freedom' and you limit the government in finding out who is a risk to society and who is not. Too little freedom and you have a authoritarian government (no guns, no anti-government views, no private media, human rights violation etc..)
Although a full investigation will be needed, I think some of the big errors here are:
1.) Campus Police did not have guns (WTF?) Enough said... 2.) The writtings made by the killer in regards to violence were not taken seriously enough (http://newsbloggers.aol.com/2007/04/17/cho-seung-huis-plays/)
On #2 - I strongly believe that people that make violent threats and/or hold violent views should be taken very seriously, documented, and action taken to hold those accountable and/or mitigate the possibility that they will be carried out - even if it means that 'freedom of speech' is not granted. It should be in the same category as sexual harassement, and even more serious. Zero tolerance.
History has shown over and over again that the threats made by megalomaniacs often become reality.... and like Columbine... there were many warning signs, 'we' failed to give them enough wait.
Again - I hope I have not upset anyone by making these comments.. I am saddened as well by the tragedy...