Now the autotrader ad shows it being listed by a dealer (the seller did say he worked for a dealer but does not claim it is dealer listed in his prime ad).
Now the autotrader ad shows it being listed by a dealer (the seller did say he worked for a dealer but does not claim it is dealer listed in his prime ad).
Looks like quite a bit of money for a 95 IMO--Look at he post under new owners--for the 97 or 98 that was just purchased-the ASK price was 35.5
on autotrader.
Looks like quite a bit of money for a 95 IMO--Look at he post under new owners--for the 97 or 98 that was just purchased-the ASK price was 35.5
on autotrader.
That's a great question. I am always amazed that people assign values to cars or determine that the price is too high or that it is a great price. These "values" are usually assigned according to a series of photographs and a brief description of the car. What do these people base these values on? I've all to often read posts that state the ""..98 is too high in price because there is another one posted that is much less expensive." Based on what? Some photos they have see and read a description? Now if the poster has in fact personally seen both cars in question, those comments do in fact have merit. Other than that, I question the validity of these comments. Car number one could be rated an "A" while car number two could be rated a "D". You can't tell from the photos and a brief description. This is also disregarding a PPI.
As a side note, this is a general comment and has nothing to do with the vehicle in question.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
