That depends on the pad. Not all pads are better than stock. (For example, Axxis makes a Metal Master pad that is worse than stock in almost every respect except price.)DCNSX said:Ken- What are the advantages/disadvantages (for track-day use) of say the Axxis vs. the OEM pads? I thought an "upgraded" pad would fade less.
For that matter, I have never encountered fade with stock pads except for their first session or two on the track, when ALL pads can fade. Oh wait, I already mentioned that in a previous post.
Typically, there are a lot of different characteristics for which you can evaluate ANY pad. For example:
Dusting - stock pads tend to dust less than track pads
Noise - stock pads don't squeal; street-track pads (e.g. Cobalt GT Sport, Hawk HP Plus) rarely squeal; track pads (Cobalt Spec VR, Carbotech Panther Plus, Endless CC-X, Porterfield R4) squeal like a stuck pig
Heat range (cold end) - stock pads and street-track pads require no warmup; track pads need to be warmed up to be fully effective (drive with track pads on the street, and your first stop or two, you will wonder where your brakes are)
Heat range (hot end) - track pads can tolerate more heat, and still maintain their full effectiveness, than stock or street-track pads
Grip - track pads provide more grip than stock and street-track pads
I have not used the Axxis Ultimate pads. My understanding is that they are a street-track pad, so I would guess that the statements above about street-track pads apply to them as well. For more details about them, including a comparison with the stock pads and with GT Sport pads, talk to the nice folks at Cobalt, and they'll be happy to fill you in. (Cobalt sells the Axxis pads as well as their own branded pads.)