If you don't have to put any money in, and it's a straight-up trade - hell yes!s2kornot said:I've been seriously considering trading in my 2001 s2000 for a 95 Acura NSX. I have about 31k miles on my s2000. The car i'm looking at has roughly 73 k and is asking $35,900.
DO you think this is a wise decision?
PoohBEAR said:let me guesssss..........................the black one in costa mesa? go for it if the car is in your heart.
s2kornot said:Hey guys,
I've been seriously considering trading in my 2001 s2000 for a 95 Acura NSX. I have about 31k miles on my s2000. The car i'm looking at has roughly 73 k and is asking $35,900.
DO you think this is a wise decision?
WingZ said:Hey bro I'm sorry I didn't respond to the heart of your question.
This isn't really a wisdom decision it's an emotional one. People here are very passionate about this car so of course their going to tell you to go for it ,but heart of the matter is it's an older vehicle with possibly more miles that your S2K. It's insurance is higher as are it's maintanence costs , it's not as good on gas either.
Just ask yourself if your willing ( and able ) to pay the higher costs. If so then go make the purchase and if not enjoy the car as a spectator until you can comfortably afford one. Remember their will alway's be another one out there to buy.
Insurance cost for an older NSX is likely to be lower than for an S2000, not higher. Gas mileage is almost identical (19/24 mpg for the NSX, 20/25 for the S2000). The frequency of scheduled maintenance is the same as the S2000; the parts cost is significantly higher for the NSX, but the labor cost is similar.WingZ said:It's insurance is higher as are it's maintanence costs , it's not as good on gas either.