I just visited the Stoptech site and I am a little shocked to see their NSX 4 wheel kit is now $5190. The front is still $1895. I was hoping that they could make a rear big rotor kit to compliment the front big caliper kit.
Steve
Steve
supergreen125 said:
jjcnsx- you are correct... the front kit is really all you need. you should only consider the 4-wheel kit if (1) your nsx is a track car, or (2) you have more money than god and spending 5 grand on brakes puts a big smile on your face.
supergreen125 said:are you talking about the extra mini caliper?
if so, that is the parking brake. most aftermarket or high performance calipers don't have a parking brake built into them.
Andrie Hartanto said:If you get a front brake kit for the NSX, the rear is a must. Or you will be working hard to fight the car at the track. Even with my porsche big red up front and the SoS rear kit in the rear, I still have to go with more aggressive pads in the rear.
JJCNSX said:Can someone please educate me on brake topic?
Brembo or Stoptech big brake setup look sweet.. Sadly, but $ 5,000+ is just way out of my league. That is a lot of lunch money i might add..
JJCNSX said:to the best of my knowledge, and from my sports bike experience: front brakes (and tires) would provide 85+ % of the braking power under DRY condition, perhaps even more if you have sticky tires on decent road surface.
JJCNSX said:I understand NSX is MR layout, but, does MR make that much difference though (in dry condition)? your front brake/tires are providing most of the braking power anyways right?..
JJCNSX said:In wet condition, rear brake might help to balance & stop your car.
JJCNSX said:Other than bragging right, and show off ticket. Do you really need all 4 wheel big brake combo? in dry condition that is.
Originally posted by Andrie HartantoIf you get a front brake kit for the NSX, the rear is a must. Or you will be working hard to fight the car at the track. Even with my porsche big red up front and the SoS rear kit in the rear, I still have to go with more aggressive pads in the rear.
Ponyboy said:have you tried a bias valve to correct your apparent front bias?
Ponyboy said:
With all due respect afforded to one who seems as track addicted, if not more, than I am, have you tried a bias valve to correct your apparent front bias? But that's the tricky part though...b/c if you're fighting the car (and I'm supposing that means keeping your elbow before your rear) that means that you have too much rear bias already. If you had too much front, you'd just be experiencing longer braking distances than optimal.
Ponyboy said:Rear brakes do balance and stop your car. Actually, too much rear bias and the rear is gonna snap around. Especially in wet conditions.
DanO said:
There is very little to be gained at the track by adding the rear setup. According to Skip Barber’s book, late braking has the least impact on lap times when compared to driving the proper line and getting on the throttle early in the corners. In my experience as an instructor, drivers who brake really hard usually brake too much and therefore enter the corners way too slow so all their really doing is going slower while heating up their brakes while making me want to vomit in the passenger’s seat. If you want to be a good on the brakes, first learn how to enter corners at the max speed.
DanO
Hrant said:Dan O and Andrie's comments couldn't have come at a more opportune time as we prepare for NSXPO 2003 ......
And I agree 100% regarding the braking stuff ....... Excellent confirmation.
We have been teaching the need to brake before the braking zone markers just to allow finishing with all the braking and shifting and getting on the throttle before the turn in ........ it's a difficult habit to break as we all want to test how late we can brake and how well the new mods are working ............. not realizing that we are often either continuing to carry the braking at turn in or coasting into the turn in because we didn't transition in time ..... and both mean less traction and thus slower speeds at the track out .........
By the way, did you notice that the ALM cars were taking early apexes on most turns at Infineon Raceway .....
Gee, I could swear you started flaming me when I mentioned the same thing recently...
Obviously, too much rear bias in the wet is a dangerous condition, but wet conditions DO NOT exasperate rear bias results since the car is more evenly balanced when braking in the wet (longer stopping distance=less weight transfer) and therefore more weight is at the rear of the car; this is why racers adjust the bias towards the REAR when it rains.