guys, this is my personal vouch for prospeed. Great guy, smart guy, and he's got a lot of new things in the works for the nsx!
+1 :smile:
***AVOID MARKETPLACE SCAMS!!***
Scammers are using compromised Prime member accounts to pose as a trusted seller in the marketplace. Before you enter into a deal with any seller, follow these tips to keep yourself safe. If you encounter one of these scammers, please report them immediately and we will lock their account.
Caveat Emptor!
guys, this is my personal vouch for prospeed. Great guy, smart guy, and he's got a lot of new things in the works for the nsx!
It would be cool to include the OEM injector in the comparison as well to see what spray pattern and cone angle Honda’s engineers chose when the intake manifold and cylinder head were designed. If the RDX injector has the same pattern but just atomizes the fuel better, it sounds like a winner! It’s too bad the RDX injector has a higher flow rate than stock, in my opinion, since that means you cannot use it with the chip you currently have in your PGM-FI. And I don’t know who can do a custom tune for me over here in Europe.I would like to compare the RDX injector vs. the ID725 (Injector Dynamics 725 cc) injector, not so much for flow rate, but for spray pattern as well.
To be fair, there are still two variables being changed at the same time – more modern injectors plus a custom-tuned chip. To see how much the injectors alone bring, it would be good to install them in a car that has already gotten a custom tune from you. You could do a before dyno (OEM injectors, OEM chip), a halfway dyno (OEM injectors, custom-tuned chip), and an after dyno (RDX injectors/custom-tuned chip). That would quantify how much of a gain you can get with custom tuning alone and how much more you can get with custom tuning plus more modern injectors. But it would require more dyno time…The gains we see are before and after with ONLY RDX injectors and ecu tuning.
We hope higher FPR will allow an even better combustion process and that equals more power.... not unlike direct injection in the newer 911's and Ferrari 458.
Personally, I’m glad our NSXs don’t have Direct Injection (DI). I’ve read about too many problems you can get with carbon fouling the tiny holes in the nozzles when you place the injector in the combustion chamber itself. I’m sure the problems will be worked out over time so that only the benefits remain. With direct injection engines, the evaporating fuel only cools the combustion chamber, not the intake system as well, allowing you to make more power. From a cold start, direct injection engines don’t have to worry about droplets of fuel condensing along the walls of the intake tract. Until the problems are worked out though, I’m glad our NSX has good old reliable indirect fuel injection. Like Formula 1 cars are still using in 2012.A colleague informed me that DI should not affect emissions unless there was something visible...
It seems to me that the injectors are mounted at very different angles in SoS’s ITB setup than in the stock intake manifold. For that reason, the spray pattern of the OEM injectors may not be ideal in your ITB setup. With the OEM pattern you may end up spraying the fuel at the wall of the ITBs instead of down the backs of the intake valves. If your current injectors spray the fuel at an angle, I’d try to find replacements that atomize the fuel better while still spraying the fuel at the correct angle. 2¢I am getting the RDX injectors mod for my ITBs.
It would be cool to include the OEM injector in the comparison as well to see what spray pattern and cone angle Honda’s engineers chose when the intake manifold and cylinder head were designed. If the RDX injector has the same pattern but just atomizes the fuel better, it sounds like a winner! It’s too bad the RDX injector has a higher flow rate than stock, in my opinion, since that means you cannot use it with the chip you currently have in your PGM-FI. And I don’t know who can do a custom tune for me over here in Europe.
To be fair, there are still two variables being changed at the same time – more modern injectors plus a custom-tuned chip. To see how much the injectors alone bring, it would be good to install them in a car that has already gotten a custom tune from you. You could do a before dyno (OEM injectors, OEM chip), a halfway dyno (OEM injectors, custom-tuned chip), and an after dyno (RDX injectors/custom-tuned chip). That would quantify how much of a gain you can get with custom tuning alone and how much more you can get with custom tuning plus more modern injectors. But it would require more dyno time…
Personally, I’m glad our NSXs don’t have Direct Injection (DI). I’ve read about too many problems you can get with carbon fouling the tiny holes in the nozzles when you place the injector in the combustion chamber itself. I’m sure the problems will be worked out over time so that only the benefits remain. With direct injection engines, the evaporating fuel only cools the combustion chamber, not the intake system as well, allowing you to make more power. From a cold start, direct injection engines don’t have to worry about droplets of fuel condensing along the walls of the intake tract. Until the problems are worked out though, I’m glad our NSX has good old reliable indirect fuel injection. Like Formula 1 cars are still using in 2012.
It seems to me that the injectors are mounted at very different angles in SoS’s ITB setup than in the stock intake manifold. For that reason, the spray pattern of the OEM injectors may not be ideal in your ITB setup. With the OEM pattern you may end up spraying the fuel at the wall of the ITBs instead of down the backs of the intake valves. If your current injectors spray the fuel at an angle, I’d try to find replacements that atomize the fuel better while still spraying the fuel at the correct angle. 2¢
It would be cool to include the OEM injector in the comparison as well to see what spray pattern and cone angle Honda’s engineers chose when the intake manifold and cylinder head were designed. If the RDX injector has the same pattern but just atomizes the fuel better, it sounds like a winner! It’s too bad the RDX injector has a higher flow rate than stock, in my opinion, since that means you cannot use it with the chip you currently have in your PGM-FI. And I don’t know who can do a custom tune for me over here in Europe.
The spray pattern I showed in the pic is essentially the same as the OEM injector... This is another pic I found on the internet of the OEM 240cc injector
The purpose of our RDX Spec rom is to offer a chip which you can use with the RDX injectors. Cherylmejia hasn't dynoed his car yet and is running the 410cc injectors... he also recently passed emissions here as well.
To be fair, there are still two variables being changed at the same time – more modern injectors plus a custom-tuned chip. To see how much the injectors alone bring, it would be good to install them in a car that has already gotten a custom tune from you. You could do a before dyno (OEM injectors, OEM chip), a halfway dyno (OEM injectors, custom-tuned chip), and an after dyno (RDX injectors/custom-tuned chip). That would quantify how much of a gain you can get with custom tuning alone and how much more you can get with custom tuning plus more modern injectors. But it would require more dyno time…
Yes, If you read again what I wrote I said the comparison is between ONLY the rdx injectors AND ecu rom tune. =) If you look at the first dyno graph on the first page you can see that we did just that...
91 NSX 5 SPEED with K&N filter,Comptech Headers,Stock cat and muffler.
Dynapak Dyno
We tested the OEM ecu vs. a Stage 3 rom tune vs. RDX Spec Program and here is the results.
-The dotted green line is the OEM ecu with stock factory 240cc injectors
-The fine green line is the Prospeed ROM tune program with stock factory injectors
- The blue line is the Tuned Prospeed RDX Spec tune with Factory Acura RDX 410cc injectors
We noticed a whopping 37 ft lbs of torque increase at 4200 rpm over stock and over 16 whp on top in VTEC. A combination of a superior injector and a properly tuned ECU really helps the NSX run safer AFR with an ideal idle and part throttle drivability.
Personally, I’m glad our NSXs don’t have Direct Injection (DI). I’ve read about too many problems you can get with carbon fouling the tiny holes in the nozzles when you place the injector in the combustion chamber itself. I’m sure the problems will be worked out over time so that only the benefits remain. With direct injection engines, the evaporating fuel only cools the combustion chamber, not the intake system as well, allowing you to make more power. From a cold start, direct injection engines don’t have to worry about droplets of fuel condensing along the walls of the intake tract. Until the problems are worked out though, I’m glad our NSX has good old reliable indirect fuel injection. Like Formula 1 cars are still using in 2012.
I have no problems with Direct Injection... There is a place for it and more and more manufacturers are going this direction. Honda plans to do this in the new NSX as well. In racing applications such as Formula 1 having the injectors suspended over the individual throttle body is great for racing but not for a street car IMO. I would love to see DAN run a dual stage injector set up like Bisi's drag car =)
It seems to me that the injectors are mounted at very different angles in SoS’s ITB setup than in the stock intake manifold. For that reason, the spray pattern of the OEM injectors may not be ideal in your ITB setup. With the OEM pattern you may end up spraying the fuel at the wall of the ITBs instead of down the backs of the intake valves. If your current injectors spray the fuel at an angle, I’d try to find replacements that atomize the fuel better while still spraying the fuel at the correct angle. 2¢
sup fellas, i just got the rdx injectors installed by brian (prospeed) a few weeks ago along with ecu rom. all i can say is this is a must to get for the budget. i am only running intake and exhaust, no headers at all..and the powerband felt so much better thru redline. i had my redline to be extended to 8100rpm and i am telling you, you can still feel the power!!!
this is a "must" have for people who is going to n/a route. i wish i had individual throttle bodies but i am going to get headers soon, get it dynoed by prospeed. props to brian's knowledge and effort to make this happen. dont hesitate guys, you will never be disappointed.
p.s. i also had the car smogged (cali rules) and it passed like a charm!
i will posts the numbers when i can.
brian, i guess i'll see you nextweek.......lol !!!:wink:
Sounds like a good another great product. From your ecu upgrade to this... Any built engine plan :wink:
Has anyone seen this video? Is more always better? Or do we max out the benefits at 750cc for a stock motor? I think this guy was running a turbo and I am going to guess that if you are NA, you can't get enough air in to the combustion chamber to match that much fuel.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OR_QHPm-9w&feature=youtube_gdata_player
2000 is WAY too big for an NA application.
ID725s should be fine for the biggest of NA applications.
This is another pic I found on the internet of the OEM 240cc injector
We tested the OEM ecu vs. a Stage 3 rom tune vs. RDX Spec Program
I have no problems with Direct Injection
If I understand it correctly, a “Stage 4” chip is custom-tuned for a specific engine on a dyno (requiring the car to be local) whereas the Stage 1, 2, and 3 chips do not require the car to be local. So the most apples-to-apples comparison would be a “Stage 4” chip with the OEM injectors vs. a “Stage 4” chip with the RDX injectors.
don't want to sound like that guy in here, but is anyone actually a fuel injector expert?
Brian - quick question regarding the rom chip. Is it a general set of tables for I/H/E/RDX setup or are you taking learned values from the stock ecu rom we send you and augmenting those for the higher flow etc? I'm just wondering since I only have H/E right now, but would likely do a K&N Filter at the same time as installing the injectors etc - but by this time I would have the RDX chip back from you. If that's the case it would have no data for the marginally higher intake flow, would it?
Interested to know what the best process would be in terms of order of tasks.
don't want to sound like that guy in here, but is anyone actually a fuel injector expert?
I mean. It has a power gain obviously, so why is everyone arguing over if its good or not?
I work at a place that designs and manufactures FI and O2 sensors... well gasoline systems, so intakes, injectors, throttle bodies, and o2 sensors... but im no expert, i just know how to test on a computer, lol
I work at a place that designs and manufactures FI and O2 sensors...
New injectors that atomize the fuel better than 20 year old injectors do sound Dude, if you work at a place that has insight into intakes, injectors, etc., could you ask an expert what kind of spray pattern and volume he thinks would be best for an NSX’s engine? (two 35 or 36 mm intake valves per cylinder, one injector per cylinder pointed pretty much straight at the valves and mounted about 130 mm away, 50 psi fuel pressure, naturally aspirated engine with 270 or 290 crank hp in stock form that spins to 8000 rpm)
L_RAO: thanks and it does help.
It makes sense that you want the injector spraying down the back of the intake valves and not wetting the walls, if possible. However, since NSXs have two intake valves per cylinder, you need a pretty wide fuel cone to spray both valves from edge to edge. If the injectors are about 130 mm from the valves, it looks like you’d need about a 30° fuel cone to fully hit them since the valves are about 73 mm wide in total. With a 25° fuel cone, you won’t hit the entire surface area of the valves (theoretically), but you’ll get pretty close. With a 5° fuel cone, it looks like you’ll mainly be spraying at the center divider.
Note: picture from JGE Racing Engines
I’d guess a 5° fuel cone is great for engines with only one intake valve per cylinder – see the Corvette LS3 intake port below - because then you can focus on that one valve while barely hitting the walls.
With two intake valves per cylinder, I’d guess that a “split stream” spray pattern would be good and barring that, a wide cone.
The “Factory Honda 240cc” injector pictured in post #84 looks like it sprays a 25° fuel cone without angling it off to one side. Looking at NSX intake ports, it would make sense to mount an injector with that kind of geometry in our engines. If that “Factory Honda 240cc” spray pattern is what our OEM NSX injectors have and the RDX injectors have the same spray pattern, great.
Dude, if you work at a place that has insight into intakes, injectors, etc., could you ask an expert what kind of spray pattern and volume he thinks would be best for an NSX’s engine? (two 35 or 36 mm intake valves per cylinder, one injector per cylinder pointed pretty much straight at the valves and mounted about 130 mm away, 50 psi fuel pressure, naturally aspirated engine with 270 or 290 crank hp in stock form that spins to 8000 rpm)