If they believe so, that is good for them. I never driven a Cayman S, so I do not qualified to comment on that.Did you read the entire 2 threads I posted with NSX owners comparing their cars handling versus Cayman? The majority stated the Cayman rocks over the NSX, not just Ken.[/B]
I am not interested in getting into arguments. I never questioned the Cayman S #s on paper, its an amazing car. My point is comparing slalom #s and Lateral acceleration#s between 2 cars simply doesn't mean as much as it seems.NSX
Targa 7/98 - lateral 0.92, slalom 62.1mph
Zanardi (type S) 6/99 - Lateral 0.93, slalom 64.6mph
2002 3/02 - Lateral 0.91, slalom 65.8mph
NSX average - Lateral 0.92, slalom 64.2
Cayman S
Cayman S 8/06 - Lateral 0.98, slalom 74.2 mph
Cayman S 11/05 - Lateral 0.96, slalom 71.7 mph
Cayman S 9/06 - Lateral 0.96, slalom 70.6 mph
Cayman average - 0.967, slalom 72.2 mph
The regular NSX-S lap 1sec faster than Cayman S. Not bad for such a weak performer on paper.
While this is valid point and I agree. It is not necessarily always true.I understand some of us put sweat and money in their cars to improve its handling to Type-S or Type-R standards. Are you efforts and dollars clouding your judgement or biasing it so you can self justify your dollars and time was well spent?
NSX-R, NSX-S, NSX-Zero owners probably don't care. These models were were available out of box in Japan.Yes, your Type R suspension will be as good as Cayman S handling, but how punishing will the ride be compared to the Cayman S?
Should already be available on youtube. If you can't find it, Just PM me.You know of course that now you must that video of the NSX-S vs Cayman S and Boxter S:biggrin:
Last edited: